green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Tallice Andrews and Thurston Brooks
(2×)
But see United States v. Preciado-Gomez, 529 F.2d 935 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1730 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976) The Fifth Circuit has advanced varying standards.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Augustus Charles Bobo, Jimmy Hancock, Jimmy Bruce Rowan, and Robert W. Kennington
But cf. United States v. Hicks, 524 F.2d 1001, 1003 (5th Cir. 1975) (only confessions which “directly inculpate” the defendant must be excluded), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 1417 , 47 L.Ed.2d 353 , cert, denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecil Hsu
(2×)
See United States v. Davis, 527 F.2d 1110, 1111 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 196 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Joel Darsey Humphrey v. Robert S. Boney, Warden, Leesburg Detention Center
See United States v. Hicks, 524 F.2d 1001, 1004 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joe S. Gonzales
See United States v. Davis, 527 F.2d 1110, 1112 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 196 (1976) (Davis).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel B. Hewitt and Bobby Gene Chesser
See United States v. Dovalina, 525 F.2d 952, 957 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976); United States v. Curtis, 644 F.2d at 270. 19 AFFIRMED. 1 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luther Wilkins, Morris Lewis, and Sam Gates, Jr.
See United States v. Davis, 527 F.2d 1110, 1111 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 196 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Dohm and Robert Rowen
(2×)
See United States v. Hicks, 524 F.2d 1001 (5 Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976)." In the present case, Rowen's objection at trial was that the colloquy between the court and counsel was improperly suggestive to the jury; Rowen did Not object to the court's ruling that Peacock did not have to give his address. 7 Rule 5 Initial Appearance Before the Magistrate. (a) In General.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James T. Cogdell, A/K/A James T. Cogwell
(2×)
See United States v. Stead, 528 F.2d 257 (8th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1730 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sam B. Haynes
See United States v. Hicks, 524 F.2d 1001 (5 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Frazier
(2×)
See also United States v. Hicks, 524 F.2d 1001, 1003-1004 (5th Cir.1975), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 946, 96 S.Ct. 1417 , 47 L.Ed.2d 353 , 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976), and cases there cited; Arkansas State Highway Comm. v. Brown, 241 Ark. 862 , 410 S.W.2d 737, 739 (1967); Pomerantz v. Goldstein, 479 Pa. 175 , 387 A.2d 1280, 1281 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Douglas B. Cole, James Hawkins, James Hensley, Carl Holley
See e.g., U.S. v. Dovalina, 525 F.2d 952 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976) (co-defendant’s handing of cocaine to government agent in accordance with defendant’s direction amounted to a distribution); U.S. v. Ramirez, 608 F.2d 1261 (9th Cir.1979) (defendant’s sharing cocaine he possessed on a noncommercial basis with friends was a distribution).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Layton
See also United States v. Preciado-Gomez, 529 F.2d 935, 942 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1730 , 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976); United States v. Davila-Nater, 474 F.2d 270, 282-84 (5th Cir.1973), reh. denied, 474 F.2d 1348 (5th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond Lopez-Diaz
(2×)
Compare United States v. Davis, 527 F.2d 1110 (9th Cir. 1975) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953 , 96 S.Ct. 1729 , 48 L.Ed.2d 196 (1976), with United States v. Barnes, 432 F.2d 89 (9th Cir. 1970). 20 In Davis, we held that a defendant's confession was properly admitted into evidence where the defendant was initially asked only if he wanted to reconsider his decision to remain silent in light of photographic evidence clearly, implicating him in the crime.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-6125.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1976.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.