green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Barbara S. Clanton v. Orleans Parish School Board
But cf. Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School District, 519 F.2d 961, 968 (9th Cir. 1975), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 429 U.S. 1033 , 97 S.Ct. 725 , 50 L.Ed.2d 744 (1977) (holding defense of qualified immunity available in Title VII suit for backpay against individual school board members; specific issue whether Title VII authorizes backpay awards against such officials neither raised nor decided).
cited
Cited "see"
Esquinance v. Polk County Education Ass'n
See Chapdelaine v. Tennessee State Bd. of Examiners, 541 S.W.2d 786 (Tenn.1976) appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 1033 , 97 S.Ct. 724 , 50 L.Ed.2d 744 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kerry Brown v. Pharmchem Laboratories, Inc., J. Michael Quinlan, Calvin Edwards, Eddie Geouge, G. Quinn, S. King, Gary L. Henman
See Benfield v. Bounds, 540 F.2d 670 , 676 and n. 9 (4th Cir.1976), vacated on other grounds, Jones v. Carroll, 429 U.S. 1033 (1977); Gorman v. Moody, 710 F.Supp. 1256, 1266 (N.D.Ind.1989); cf. United States v. Rising, 867 F.2d 1255, 1259 (10th Cir.1989) (prison administrative punishment does not render subsequent criminal proceeding violative of double jeopardy).
cited
Cited "see"
Dial-A-Page, Inc. v. Bissell
See Chapdelaine v. Tennessee State Bd. of Examiners, 541 S.W.2d 786 (Tenn.1976) appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 1033 , 97 S. Gt. 724, 50 L.Ed.2d 744 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harriss v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See, Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School Disk, 519 F.2d 961 (9th Cir., 1975), vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Gilbert, 429 U.S. 1033 , 97 *437 S.Ct. 725, 50 L.Ed.2d 744 (1977), vacated and remanded with instructions to dismiss complaint, Nos. 74-3181, 74-3182, 558 F.2d 1037 (9th Cir., 1977) (denial of sick leave to pregnant teachers upheld in the face of a Title VII attack).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vaughn v. Regents of University of California
Also to be considered is whether the entity sued is performing a governmental or proprietary function, whether it has been separately incorporated, whether it has the power to sue and be sued and enter into contracts, the degree of autonomy over its operations, and whether the state has immunized itself from responsibility for the agency’s operations . . . . ” Jackson Sawmill Co. v. United States, 580 F.2d 302, 308 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1070 , 99 S.Ct. 839 , 59 L.Ed.2d 35 (1979), quoting Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 519 F.2d 559, 564 (2d Cir. 1975), rev’d on other grounds, 42…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McDonald, aka MacDonald
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 75-1419.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1977.
Rehnquist, White.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to consider merits of petitioner’s appeal.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent.