green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Brinkman v. State
In such a case, the defendant cannot complain because the error does him no harm. [Citations omitted.] Id. at 960.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coburn
(2×)
See State v. McCorgary, 218 Kan. 358, 365 , 543 P.2d 952 (1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 867 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
See 15 U.S.C. § 717r(e). 5 See also Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.) (order is final “unless and until it is stayed, modified, or reversed”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); State of Louisiana v. Federal Power Comm’n, 483 F.2d 972 (5th Cir.1973) (neither application for rehearing, nor the institution of review in the Court of Appeals operates to stay a FERC order “unless such a stay is specifically ordered by the Commission or Court”); Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 424 F.2d 783 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1969) (or…
discussed
Cited "see"
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Value Call International, Inc.
See Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Comm'n, 424 F.2d 783 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937 , 90 S.Ct. 944 , 25 L.Ed.2d 118 (1970). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Utilicorp United Inc.
See Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 5 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976) (resolution of a matter before an administrative or judicial tribunal is final unless and until it is stayed, modified, or reversed); Panhandle v. Michigan Consolidated, No. 95-CV-70970-DT, slip op. at 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee Gas Pipeline v. 104 Acres in Prov. Cty.
However, The Natural Gas Act directs that an application for a rehearing shall not operate as a stay of the Commission’s order unless specifically ordered by the Commission or by a reviewing Court of Appeals. 15 U.S.C. § 717r(c); see Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.) (order is final “unless and until it is stayed, modified, or reversed”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 424 F.2d 783 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1969) (commission’s orders effective during disposition of review proceedings),…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mid Louisiana Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Ecee, Inc. v. F.P.C., 526 F.2d 1270, 1274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); Jupiter Corp. v. F.P.C., 424 F.2d 783 , 791 (D.C.Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937 , 90 S.Ct. 944 , 25 L.Ed.2d 118 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Amador Rodriguez-Ramos
See United States v. Canada, 527 F.2d 1374, 1378 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 177 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); United States v. Lonabaugh, 494 F.2d 1257, 1262 (5th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Walters
See State v. McCorgary, 218 Kan. 358, 366 , 543 P.2d 952 (1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 867 (1976); State v. Ogden, 210 Kan. 510 , 502 P.2d 654 (1972); State v. Freeman, 198 Kan. 301, 304 , 424 P.2d 261 (1967). 9.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cooke
(2×)
See United States v. Canada, 527 F. 2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 147 , 97 S.Ct. 177 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Life Insurance Co. of Georgia v. United States
See Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 619 , 530 F. 2d 1367 , cert. denied, 429 U. S. 867 (1976); Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. United States, supra. Accord, Artnell Co. v. Commissioner, 400 F. 2d 981 (7th Cir. 1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Karyn Rene Walther, United States of America v. Graciela Barba-Barba
See United States v. Canada, 527 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 177 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976); United States v. Davis, 482 F.2d 893 (9th Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Shuckahosee
See State v. McCorgary, 218 Kan. 358, 367 , 543 P.2d 952 (1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 867 (1976). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McCorgary
See State v. McCorgary, 218 Kan. 358 , 543 P.2d 952 (1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 867 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 , 97 S.Ct. 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Jose Raul Pagan Torres, Etc. v. Pedro Negron Ramos, Etc.
Accord, Royal, v. Superior Court of New Hampshire, Rockingham County, 531 F.2d 1084 , 1088 n. 14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 178 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Balthazar v. Superior Ct. of Com. of Mass.
A “conviction cannot be sustained on appeal by a limiting construction which eliminates the unconstitutional features of the [A]ct, as the trial took place under the unconstitutional construction of the [A]ct.” Ashton v. Kentucky, 384 U.S. 195, 198 , 86 S.Ct. 1407, 1409 , 16 L.Ed.2d 469 (1966); accord, Royal v. Superior Court of N. H., Rockingham County, 531 F.2d 1084 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 178 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Chastain
Compare United States v. Harvey, 540 F.2d 1345 , 1353 n. 10 (8th Cir.1976) (statutorily authorized monitoring of telephone line by telephone company did not constitute state action) with United States v. Canada, 527 F.2d 1374, 1377 (9th Cir. 1975) (search by security guard at airport constituted state action), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 177 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mayfield v. Ford
See e.g., Royal v. Superior Court, 531 F.2d 1084, 1086-87 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 867 , 97 S.Ct. 178 , 50 L.Ed.2d 147 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wolf
See also State v. McCorgary, 218 Kan. 358 , 543 P.2d 952 (1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 867 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Superior Court of New Hampshire, Rockingham County
v.
Royal
v.
Royal
No. 75-1724.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.