green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pub Svc Elec & Gas v. FERC
See, e.g., North Carolina v. Federal Power Comm'n, 533 F.2d 702, 706 (D.C.Cir.) (declining to review alleged illegality of use of water for pollution dilution, and neglect of possible use of National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, for failure to articulate claim in petition for rehearing), vacated on other grounds, 429 U.S. 891 , 97 S.Ct. 250 , 50 L.Ed.2d 174 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See, e.g., North Carolina v. Federal Power Comm’n, 533 F.2d 702, 706 (D.C.Cir.) (declining to review alleged illegality of use of water for pollution dilution, and neglect of possible use of National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, for failure to articulate claim in petition for rehearing), vacated on other grounds, 429 U.S. 891 , 97 S.Ct. 250 , 50 L.Ed.2d 174 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Westchester Associates, Inc. v. Boston Edison Co.
Compare Hub Theatres, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port Authy., 370 Mass. 153, 155-156 , cert, denied, 429 U.S. 891 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
North Carolina
v.
Federal Power Commission
v.
Federal Power Commission
No. 75-1657.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1976.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Pub. L. 94-407, 82 Stat. 906.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.