green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“prohibition against the communication of an officer's disaffection to rank-and-file members of the department during regular duty hours may be considered as a necessary adjunct to the department's substantial interest in maintaining discipline, morale and uniformity.”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Younkers v. Prince George's County
prohibition against the communication of an officer's disaffection to rank-and-file members of the department during regular duty hours may be considered as a necessary adjunct to the department's substantial interest in maintaining discipline, morale and uniformity.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Caro-Quintero
See, U.S. v. Gaffney, 676 F.Supp. 1544, 1550 (M.D.Fla.1987) (citing U.S. v. Winkle, 587 F.2d 705, 714 (5th Cir.)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 827 , 100 S.Ct. 51 , 62 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979) and U.S. v. Riley, 544 F.2d 237, 242 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1554 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Company
See Dwyer v. Climatrol Industries, Inc., 544 F.2d 307, 311 (7th Cir.1976) (union did not breach duty of fair representation in negotiating plant closedown agreement), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1553 , 51 L.Ed.2d 776 (1977). 52 In the context of grievance processing, in order to establish that the union has breached its duty of fair representation the employee must show that the union's handling of the grievance was either arbitrary, discriminatory, or done in bad faith.
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Co.
See Dwyer v. Climatrol Industries, Inc., 544 F.2d 307, 311 (7th Cir.1976) (union did not breach duty of fair representation in negotiating plant closedown agreement), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1553 , 51 L.Ed.2d 776 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew J. Fowler, and Edgar E. Fowler
See United States v. Riley, 544 F.2d 237, 240 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1554 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wendell Thomas, Patrick M. Roberts, Robert White, and Robert H. Maddox
See United *245 States v. Riley, 544 F.2d 237 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1554 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Camp v. Camp
See discussion of these cases and others in this court’s opinion in Crabbe v. Hord, 536 S.W.2d 409, 413 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1976, writ ref’d n. r. e.), cert. den. 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1554 , 51 L.Ed.2d 776 (1977), and Mitchell v. Webb, Docket No. 18209 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth, October 25, 1979) (not yet reported).
cited
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Webb
See Crabbe v. Hord, 536 S.W.2d 409, 413, 414 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1976, writ ref’d n. r. e.) cert. den. 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1554 , 51 L.Ed.2d 776 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Warren Lonnell Harris
Id. at 762 ; see Kannisto v. City & County of San Francisco, 541 F.2d 841, 844 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1552 , 51 L.Ed.2d 775 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Alonzo Doran
See United States v. Riley, 544 F.2d 237, 242 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1554 , 51 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See also, Bedell v. State, 257 Ark. 895 , 521 S.W.2d 200 , cert. den., 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1552 , 51 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See also, Bedell v. State, 257 Ark. 895 , 521 S.W.2d 200 , cert. den., 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1552 , 51 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Malden Mills Industries, Inc. v. ILGWU National Retirement Fund
See, e.g., Dwyer v. Climatrol Indus., Inc., 544 F.2d 307, 310 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1553 , 51 L.Ed.2d 776 (1977) (parties could modify the employer’s prospective obligation to contribute to the pension plan).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. Scribner
In this circuit, a police department ordinarily will not be governed by the same standard as a school district: "Substantial differences between the public interest in education and the public interest in safety and order justify a difference in the standards by which the respective institutions may protect themselves from ... their employees." Byrd v. Gain, 558 F.2d 553, 554 (9th Cir.1977) (refusing to expunge reprimands from personnel files of officers who had issued public statements about the police department's stop-and-frisk tactics), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1282 , 55 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grant v. Burlington Industries
Compare Hoffman, 658 F.2d at 521 (citing Dwyer v. Climatrol Indus., Inc., 544 F.2d 307 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1553 , 51 L.Ed.2d 776 (1977) and Cannon v. Consolidated Freightways Corp., 524 F.2d 290 (7th Cir.1975)) with Hoffman, 658 F.2d at 523-24 (Cudahy, J., concurring) (citing Miller v. Gateway Transp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grant v. Burlington Industries
Compare Hoffman, 658 F.2d at 521 (citing Dwyer v. Climatrol Indus., Inc., 544 F.2d 307 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 1553 , 51 L.Ed.2d 776 (1977) and Cannon v. Consolidated Freightways Corp., 524 F.2d 290 (7th Cir.1975)) with Hoffman, 658 F.2d at 523-24 (Cudahy, J., concurring) (citing Miller v. Gateway Transp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. Scribner
In this circuit, a police department ordinarily will not be governed by the same standard as a school district; “Substantial differences between the public interest in education and the public interest in safety and order justify a difference in the standards by which the respective institutions may protect themselves from ... their employees.” Byrd v. Gain, 558 F.2d 553, 554 (9th Cir.1977) (refusing to expunge reprimands from personnel files of officers who had issued public statements about the police department’s stop-and-frisk tactics), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1282 , 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers of America v. Crane Company and Its Subsidiary, Acheson Manufacturing Company
See, e.g., Dwyer v. Climatrol Industries, Inc., 544 F.2d 307, 310 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. *718 1553, 51 L.Ed.2d 776 (1977) (employees suing union and company unprotected when contract reserved right of modification); International Union of United Brewery Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers v. Duke & Co., 373 F.Supp. 778 , 786 (W.D.Pa.1974), aff’d mem., 510 F.2d 969 (3d Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hosto v. Brickell
See also, Bedell v. State, 257 Ark. 895 , 521 S.W. 2d 200 , cert. den., 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S. Ct. 1552 , 51 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grant
v.
Parke
v.
Parke
No. 76-1017.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.