green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Even detrimental reliance on misinformation ... will not excuse a failure to qualify for benefits under the relevant statutes and regulations”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[t]he crucial variant in [the Pickering balance] appears to have been the hierarchial proximity of the criticizing employee to the person or body criticized.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“The government could hardly function if it were bound by its employees’ unauthorized representations.”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lane v. United States
even detrimental reliance on misinformation ... will not excuse a failure to qualify for benefits under the relevant statutes and regulations
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ATC Petroleum, Inc. v. Sanders
the government could hardly function if it were bound by its employees' unauthorized representations.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wulf v. City of Wichita
he crucial variant in appears to have been the hierarchial proximity of the criticizing employee to the person or body criticized.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In the Matter of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company. Appeal of United States of America
estoppel against the united states is rarely appropriate
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Dezarn
See United States v. Swainson, 648 F.2d 657, 662 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); see also Behrle v. United States, 100 F.2d 714, 715-716 (D.C.Cir.1938); United States v. Beach, 296 F.2d 153, 155 (4th Cir.1961); United States v. Collins, 272 F.2d 650, 652 (2d Cir.1959); Fotie v. United States, 137 F.2d 831, 842 (8th Cir.1943).
cited
Cited "see"
Coppola v. United States
See Goldberg v. Weinberger, 546 F.2d 477 , 481 n. 5 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2648 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ming He, Also Known as Tony Jai
See United States v. Jacobs, 547 F.2d 772, 776 (2d Cir.1976), cert. granted, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2647 , 53 L.Ed.2d 254 (1977), and cert. dismissed, 436 U.S. 31 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biggs v. Village of Dupo
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (assistant district attorney’s public accusation that his immediate supervisor had lied “totally precluded any future relationship between him and the defendant”); Egger, 710 F.2d at 321 (evidence of rumors, alleged threats, discord in the office and mutual distrust between the FBI agent plaintiff and others); Foster v. Ripley, 645 F.2d 1142, 1149 (D.C.Cir.1981) (direct attack on superior completely disrupted plaintiffs working relationships and effectiveness).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biggs v. Village Of Dupo
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (assistant district attorney's public accusation that his immediate supervisor had lied "totally precluded any future relationship between him and the defendant"); Egger, 710 F.2d at 321 (evidence of rumors, alleged threats, discord in the office and mutual distrust between the FBI agent plaintiff and others); Foster v. Ripley, 645 F.2d 1142, 1149 (D.C.Cir.1981) (direct attack on superior completely disrupted plaintiff's working relationships and effectiveness). 21 No…
cited
Cited "see"
Lees v. West Greene School District
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Kuchka v. Kile
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Wood v. Town of Frederica
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); 5 C.
cited
Cited "see"
Switlik v. Hardwicke Company
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Switlik v. Hardwicke Co.
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernitsky v. United States
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 , 563 n.4 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977). 36 Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of the district court. 1 See Dupree v. United States, 247 F.2d 819, 825 (3d Cir. 1957); Jayson, Application of the Discretionary Function Exception, Symposium on the Federal Tort Claims Act, 24 Fed.B.J. 153 (1964); Reynolds, The Discretionary Function Exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 57 Geo.L.J. 81, 82 (1968) 2 In support of its Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, the Government pres…
cited
Cited "see"
Bernitsky v. United States
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 , 563 n.4 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Tore v. Local 245 of the Jersey City Public Employees Union
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
De Tore v. Local 245 of Jersey City Public Employees Union
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Esther Atcherson v. Honorable Judge John Siebenmann, Judge of the Juvenile Court, Johnson County, District Court of Iowa, Esther Atcherson v. Honorable Judge John Siebenmann, Judge of the Juvenile Court, Johnson County, District Court of Iowa
(2×)
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1976) (En banc ), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 520 F.2d 1364 (3d Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atcherson v. Siebenmann
(2×)
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 520 F.2d 1364 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoopes v. City of Chester
See 412 F.Supp. 910 , 918-19 nn. 28-29 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boney v. United States
Accord, United States v. Swainson, 548 F.2d 657, 662 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 117 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orville S. Clavey
See United States v. Swainson, 548 F.2d 657, 663 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miriam Sakol v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Goldberg v. Weinberger, 546 F.2d 477, 480 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2648 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (rational relationship test appropriate for due process and equal protection challenge to Social Security law denying certain benefits to widows who remarry before reaching age 60); cf. Image Carrier Corp. v. Beame, 567 F.2d 1197, 1202-03 (2d Cir. 1977) (rational relationship test appropriate for equal protection challenge to economic regulation).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldassare v. County of Bergen
Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 106 ; see also Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldassare v. The State Of New Jersey
Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 106 ; see also Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 53 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zamboni v. Stamler
In particular, the district court will have to determine whether Zamboni’s functional role in the prosecutor's office was of such proximity to Stamler that his speech destroyed “a needed close working relationship.” Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 106 ; see also Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977). 6 Furthermore, in evaluating the disruption, if any, that resulted from Zamboni’s criticisms of Stamler’s reorganization plan, the district court must consider whether any unrest was caused directly by Zamboni�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zamboni v. Stamler
In particular, the district court will have to determine whether Zamboni's functional role in the prosecutor's office was of such proximity to Stamler that his speech destroyed "a needed close working relationship." Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 106 ; see also Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977). 6 25 Furthermore, in evaluating the disruption, if any, that resulted from Zamboni's criticisms of Stamler's reorganization plan, the district court must consider whether any unrest was caused directly by Zamboni's speech…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Long Island Radio Company, D/B/A All Shores Radio Company v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., Goldberg v. Weinberger, 546 F.2d 477, 481 (2d Cir.1976) (misinformation given by an apparently authorized government agent does not excuse claimant’s failure to meet statutory and regulatory qualifications to obtain benefits), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2648 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Friends First Jewelry Corp. v. Giuffrida
Corp., 332 U.S. 380 , 68 S.Ct. 1 , 92 L.Ed. 10 ; see also Goldberg v. Weinberger, 546 F.2d 477, 481 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2648 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Czurlanis v. Albanese
See also Monsanto v. Quinn, 674 F.2d at 994 . 40 In this case, there is no evidence that the relationship between Czurlanis and his immediate superiors was seriously undermined or that the operations of the Division of Motor Vehicles were disrupted--factors that would "weigh[ ] against, not for, first amendment protection in the Pickering balance." Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 566 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); see also Trotman v. Board of Trustees, 635 F.2d at 230.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Minor Gressley v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
See, e. g., Goldberg v. Weinberger, 546 F.2d 477 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2468 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Allied Mills, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 76-1160.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1977.
431 U.S. 937
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.