green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 2 distinct cases ·
“nearly three years”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Blocker v. Graham
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830, 840 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Barksdale v. Crawley
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Crispino v. Allard
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Allen
See People v. Gladney, 194 Colo. 68 , 570 P.2d 231 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 776 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Defio v. Henderson
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830, 840 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc) (“[W]e have no authority to review the state record and grant the writ simply because we disagree with the result reached by the state courts.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Feliberto Capellan v. Dean Riley, Superintendent of the Fishkill Correctional Facility
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Capellan v. Riley
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830, 840 (2d Cir.1977) (Fourth Amendment claim raised for first time in New York Court of Appeals), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978); McPhail v. Warden, 707 F.2d 67, 69 (petitioner did not timely raise Fourth Amendment claim); Foran v. Metz, 463 F.Supp. 1088, 1093 (S.D.N.Y.) (petitioner was given suppression hearing), aff’d., 603 F.2d 212 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 830 , 100 S.Ct. 58 , 62 L.Ed.2d 38 (1979); Shaw v. Scully, 654 F.Supp. 859, 865 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (same). .
cited
Cited "see"
Sharrar v. Foltz
See generally Blake v. Morford, 563 F.2d 248 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); Watson v. Jago, 558 F.2d 330, 338 (6th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. Marshall
See Blake v. Morford, 563 F.2d 248, 250 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied sub nom., Blake v. Thompson, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978): Combs v. Tennessee, 530 F.2d 695, 698-99 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 954 , 96 S.Ct. 1731 , 48 L.Ed.2d 198 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. People
(2×)
See People v. Gladney, 194 Colo. 68 , 570 P.2d 231 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 776 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978); People v. Anderson, 184 Colo. 32 , 518 P.2d 828 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse James Jackson v. Charles C. Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
As to the fourth amendment claim, we previously have held that “a fourth amendment claim may not be considered by a federal habeas corpus court if the state has provided an opportunity fully and fairly to litigate it.” McPhail v. Warden, Attica Correctional Facility, 707 F.2d 67, 69 (2d Cir.1983); accord Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830, 837 (2d Cir.1977) (in banc), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Gable
See People v. Gladney, 194 Colo. 68 , 570 P.2d 231 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 776 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 ; People v. Martinez, 535 P.2d 255 (Colo.App.1975) (not selected for official publication).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Borrelli
See People v. Gladney, 194 Colo. 68 , 570 P.2d 231 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 776 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cruz v. Alexander
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978) (failure to object to the introduction of evidence during the trial); Pulver v. Cunningham, 562 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1977), LiPuma v. Commissioner, Department of Corrections, State of New York, 560 F.2d 84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861 , 98 S.Ct. 189 , 54 L.Ed.2d 135 (1977) (failure to move to suppress challenged evidence prior to trial). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Hoover v. New York
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 , 843 n.6 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc) (Oakes, Smith & Feinberg, JJ., concurring), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978); Jiminez v. Estelle, 557 F.2d 506, 510-11 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brawer v. United States
See Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 , 843 n. 6 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc) (Oakes, J., concurring), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978); Ramsey v. United States, supra. Finally, even on the improbable assumption that the admission of testimony regarding the alleged uncounseled convictions was error of which Brawer may complain, this Court finds that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baez v. Royce
Stone permits habeas review of Fourth Amendment claims only “(a) if the state has provided no corrective procedures at all to redress the alleged [F]ourth [A]mendment violations; or (b) if the state has provided a corrective mechanism, but the [petitioner] was precluded from using that mechanism because of an unconscionable breakdown in the underlying process.” Capellan v. Riley, 975 F.2d 67, 70 (2d Cir. 1992); see also Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830, 839 (2d Cir. 1977) (“[A]ll that the [Supreme] Court required [in Stone] was that the state should have provided the opportunity to the s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Kuhlmann
See also, Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830, 836-837 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied., 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978); McRoy v. Fogg, No. Civ.87-1551, 1989 WL 18753 at *7 (Feb. 22, 1989 E.D.N.Y.) (applying Stone to petitioner’s claim that his confession should be suppressed as a product of his unlawful arrest).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Denbow v. Williams
See also People v. Gladney, 194 Colo. 68 , 570 P.2d 231 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 776 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Lenza v. Donald W. Wyrick, Warden Attorney General of the State of Missouri
In Stone v. Powell the Supreme Court held that “where the State has provided an opportunity for full and fair litigation of a Fourth Amendment claim, a state prisoner may not be granted federal habeas corpus relief on the ground that evidence obtained in an unconstitutional search or seizure was introduced at his trial.” Id. at 482 , 96 S.Ct. at 3046 ; see, e.g., Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1977) (banc), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams
See, e.g., Layne v. Gunter, 559 F.2d 850, 851 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 (1978); Rivera v. Concepcion, 469 F.2d 17, 19-20 (1st Cir. 1972); Codispoti v. Howard, 589 F.2d 135, 139-142 (3d Cir. 1978); Dozie v. Cady, 430 F.2d 637, 638 (7th Cir. 1970); Way v. Crouse, 421 F.2d 145 , *626 146 (10th Cir. 1970); State v. Lagerquist, 254 S.C. 501, 505-506 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 937 (1971). 5 We may assume that delay in the disposition of a criminal appeal does not affect its outcome, as delay of a trial may well do through loss of witnesses or the like; where, however, a retria…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cannistraci v. Smith
See also Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 , 98 S.Ct. 775 , 54 L.Ed.2d 787 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arthur J. Nathaniel
v.
W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
v.
W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
77-5738.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1978.
434 U.S. 1038
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
Arthur J. NATHANIEL, petitioner,
v.
W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
No. 77-5738
Supreme Court of the United States
January 16, 1978
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
1
Denied.