Patterson v. Arkansas, 434 U.S. 1067 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Patterson v. Arkansas, 434 U.S. 1067 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 5× by 3 distinct cases · "Prejudice has been found in situations where the party seeking arbitration allows the opposing party to undergo the types of litigation expenses that arbitration was designed to alleviate."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[T]he rezoning was comprehensive and bore a substantial relationship to the public health, comfort, safety ... [A]s such it enjoys a strong presumption of validity.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[Ojnly that permissible densities ... have been significantly decreased; that showing is ... insufficient to demonstrate a confiscatory exercise____”
188 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 71 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cheshire v. Fitness & Sports Clubs, LLC (flsd, 2019-06-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Cheshire v. Fitness & Sports Clubs, LLC
S.D. Fla. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
prejudice has been found in situations where the party seeking arbitration allows the opposing party to undergo the types of litigation expenses that arbitration was designed to alleviate.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Guy
Mass. · 2004 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a defendant cannot have it both ways. if he talks, what he says or omits is to be judged on its merits or demerits, and not on some artificial standard that only the part that helps him can be later referred to
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Offen v. County Council for Prince George's County (2×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1993 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
he rezoning was comprehensive and bore a substantial relationship to the public health, comfort, safety ... s such it enjoys a strong presumption of validity.
discussed Cited "see" Brinkley v. Houk
N.D. Ohio · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goldman, 563 F.2d 501, 503-04 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978) (right to remain silent was waived and prosecution was properly permitted to use, during case in chief and summation, two questions asked by interrogating agent to which defendant either refused to respond or did not respond). h. during the opening comments of the mitigation phase, the prosecutor misstated the definition of mitigating factor During opening statement, the prosecutor stated that “mitigating factors are factors that lessen the moral culpability …
discussed Cited "see" HNS Development v. People's Counsel
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
Chapman v. Montgomery County Council, 259 Md. 641 , 271 A.2d 156 (1970); Board of County Comm’rs. for Prince George’s County v. Edmonds, 240 Md. 680 , 215 A.2d 209 (1965); see Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc., 280 Md. 686 , 376 A.2d 483 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 [ 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 769 ] (1977) (Master Plan a guide, not a straitjacket); Kanfer v. Montgomery County Council, supra [ 35 Md.App. 715, 733 , 373 A.2d 5 , cert. denied, 281 Md. 741 (1977) ] (plan a “prophecy” as to future development).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Millar
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goldman, 563 F.2d 501, 504-05 (1st Cir.1977) (prosecutor’s statement that defendant’s conduct demeaned his wearing of a yarmulke showed “extremely poor judgment” but did not require reversal), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Millar
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goldman, 563 F.2d 501, 504-05 (1st Cir.1977) (prosecutor's statement that defendant's conduct demeaned his wearing of a yarmulke showed "extremely poor judgment" but did not require reversal), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978). 19 Moloney's third challenge to the government's summation is that the prosecutor personally attacked defense counsel.
discussed Cited "see" PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY. v. Webster
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
Chapman v. Montgomery County Council, 259 Md. 641 , 271 A.2d 156 (1970); Board of County Comm’rs. for Prince George’s County v. Edmonds, 240 Md. 680 , 215 A.2d 209 (1965); see Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc., 280 Md. 686 , 376 A.2d 483 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 [ 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 769 ] (1977) (Master Plan a guide, not a straitjacket); Kanfer v. Montgomery County Council, supra [ 35 Md.App. 715, 733 , 373 A.2d 5 , cert. denied, 281 Md. 741 (1977) ] (plan a “prophecy” as to future development).
discussed Cited "see" Elf Aquitaine, Inc. v. Placid Oil Co.
D. Del. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. v. Railroad Commission, 565 F.2d 144, 147 (TECA 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., 503 F.2d 1060, 1063 (TECA 1974). 12 Moreover, for the reasons discussed earlier, Elf’s breach of contract action cannot be said to “arise under” the DOE regulations.
discussed Cited "see" Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Kan. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nix v. Northern Natural Gas Producing Co., 222 Kan. 739 , 567 P.2d 1322 (1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1067 (1978); Sterling v. The Superior Oil Co., 222 Kan. 737 , 567 P.2d 1325 (1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1067 (1978); Maddox v. Gulf Oil Corporation, 222 Kan. 733 , 567 P.2d 1326 (1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1065 (1978); Lightcap v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 221 Kan. 448 , 562 P.2d 1 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 876 (1977); Helmley v. Ashland Oil, Inc., 1 Kan.
discussed Cited "see" Floyd v. COUNTY COUNCIL OF PG CTY.
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
Chapman v. Montgomery County Council, 259 Md. 641 , 271 A.2d 156 (1970); Board of County Comm’rs. for Prince *259 George’s County v. Edmonds, 240 Md. 680 , 215 A.2d 209 (1965); see Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc., 280 Md. 686 , 376 A.2d 483 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 (1977) (Master Plan a guide, not a straitjacket); Kanfer v. Montgomery County Council, supra (plan a "prophecy” as to future development).
cited Cited "see" Insurance Commissioner v. Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc.
Md. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Montgomery Co. v. Woodward & Lothrop, 280 Md. 686 , 376 A.2d 483 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S. Ct. 1245 , 55 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Philpot
cma · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goldman, 563 F.2d 501 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Twyman v. Oklahoma, 560 F.2d 422 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1071 , 98 S.Ct. 1254 , 55 L.Ed.2d 774 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Prince George's County v. Equitable Trust Co.
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc., 280 Md. 686 , 376 A.2d 483 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 (1978); County Council v. District Land Corp., 274 Md. 691 , 337 A.2d 712 (1975); Scull v. Coleman, 251 Md. 6 , 246 A.2d 223 (1968); Grooms v. La Vale Zoning Board, 27 Md.
discussed Cited "see" Simmons v. Zahradnick
E.D. Va. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Goldman, 563 F.2d 501 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978); Twyman v. Oklahoma, 560 F.2d 422 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1071 , 98 S.Ct. 1254 , 55 L.Ed.2d 774 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Donovan
Mass. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Goldman, 563 F.2d 501, 503 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. Prince George's County
D. Maryland · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc., 280 Md. 686 , 376 A.2d 483 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 769 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Boehm v. Gulf Oil Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1980 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Griffin v. United States, 537 F.2d 1130 (Em.App.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 , with Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas, 565 F.2d 144 (Em.App.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 for a discussion by the Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals of the relationship between Sections 210 and 211.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Dempsey v. Rhodes Oil Co.
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas, 565 F.2d 144, 146 (Em.App.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patterson
v.
Arkansas
No. 77-829.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1978.
434 U.S. 1067
Published
4 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 76%
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (2) · S.D. Florida (1) · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)

Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.