green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[t]he burden on one seeking to prove a waiver of arbitration is a heavy one”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lee v. Grandcor Medical Systems, Inc.
he burden on one seeking to prove a waiver of arbitration is a heavy one
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
See Standard Forge and Axle Co. v. Coleman, 551 F.2d 1268, 1269-70 (D.C.Cir.1972), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 81 (1977); Nader, 551 F.2d at 271 ; see also Independent Cosmetic Manufacturers and Distributors, Inc. v. United States Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, 574 F.2d 553, 554 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893 , 99 S.Ct. 250 , 58 L.Ed.2d 238 (1978). 18 This Court embraces this construction.
cited
Cited "see"
National Foundation for Cancer Research v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Harold T. Hedges
See Jackson, 636 F.2d at 833 n. 4 (citing Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Bruce Johnson
See United States v. Scruggs, 549 F.2d 1097, 1103 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 70 , 54 L.Ed.2d 81 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Smoky Greenhaw Cotton Co., Inc., and John C. Greenhaw, Cross-Appellees v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Cross-Appellants
See Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 , 543 n. 3 (5th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory Marketing Corporation and Daniel Scher v. Wakefern Food Corporation and Red Cheek, Inc.
(2×)
Associated General Contractors, 459 U.S. at 536-537 , 103 S.Ct. at 908 ; see Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, 552 F.2d 90, 99 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
See Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 544 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); DeHart v. Moore, 424 F.Supp. 55 (S.D.Fla.1976); cf. Raiford v. Buslease Inc., 745 F.2d at 1421-22 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,831 Bernice Barbour Raiford, Morgan B. Raiford v. Buslease Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Thomas F. Morris, Morgan B. Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Bernice B. Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Thomas F. Morris, Defendants
See Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 541 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); see also, Belke v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 693 F.2d 1023, 1025 (11th Cir.1982); Sawyer v. Raymond, James & Associates, Inc., 642 F.2d 791, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B); Wick v. Atlantic Marine, Inc., 605 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.1979). 3 It is a judicially created exception to the command of section 3 of the Arbitration Act that the court, on application of a party, shall "stay the trial of the action until [the agreed to] arbitration has been had ...." It…
discussed
Cited "see"
Raiford v. Buslease Inc.
See Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 541 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); see also, Belke v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 693 F.2d 1023, 1025 (11th Cir.1982); Sawyer v. Raymond, James & Associates, Inc., 642 F.2d 791, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B); Wick v. Atlantic Marine, Inc., 605 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.1979). 3 It is a judicially created exception to the command of section 3 of the Arbitration Act that the court, on application of a party, shall “stay the trial of the action until [the agreed to] arbitration has been had ____�…
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,531 Robert Kershaw and Rob Kershaw v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See Sibley v. Tandy, 543 F.2d 540, 542-43 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph R. Silvestri
See United States v. Ordner, 554 F.2d 24, 29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Missouri Valley Construction Co.
(2×)
See United States v. Scharf, 551 F.2d 1124, 1129 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 70 , 54 L.Ed.2d 81 (1977); United States v. Lambros, 544 F.2d 962, 966 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 930 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold F. Mayo, Jr. And Mark A. McGarghan
See United States v. Ordner, 554 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); United States v. Cohen, 431 F.2d 830 , 832 n. 3 (2d Cir.1970); United States v. Dehar, 388 F.2d 430, 432-33 (2d Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laurence J. Gordon, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1978) (reversing the district court’s granting of summary judgment which held that restrictions imposed on an agent cannot violate the antitrust laws).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shaw v. Russell Trucking Line, Inc.
See Bravmen v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1978); International Ass’n of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers v. United Contractors Ass’n, 483 F.2d 384 (3d Cir. 1973), amended, 494 F.2d 1353 (3d Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 102 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
California State Council Of Carpenters v. Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Indus., Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 99 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Cromar Co. v. Nuclear Materials & Equip.
cited
Cited "see"
California State Council of Carpenters v. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Indus., Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 99 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Cromar Co. v. Nuclear Materials & Equip.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Olga Valencia and William Suarez Valencia
(2×)
See United States v. Ordner, 554 F.2d 24, 28-29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977). 38 D.
cited
Cited "see"
Yates
See Pryor v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 578, 580 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 (1977); Yates v. Manale, 377 F. 2d 888, 889 (5th Cir. 1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Dale S. Bogus v. American Speech & Hearing Association
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Inds., Inc., 552 F.2d 90 , 98 & n.19 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); P. Areeda & D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. v. Amstar Corp.
See Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 100 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); cf. International Railways of Central America v. United Brands Co., 358 F.Supp. 1363, 1370, 1372, 1373 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d on other grounds, 532 F.2d 231 (2d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Prince
First, it is well established that the “knowledge prong of the money laundering statute can be proven by direct or circumstantial evidence.” United States v. Johnson, 26 Fed.Appx. 441, 446 (6th Cir.2001), citing United States v. Moss, 9 F.3d 543, 551-52 (6th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Scruggs, 549 F.2d 1097, 1104 (6th Cir.1977) (“Proof of knowledge, like proof of intent, is rarely established by direct evidence ... circumstantial evidence [and] independent facts from which an inference of the ultimate fact may rationally be drawn in light of common experience can be sufficient …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
United States v. Moss, 9 F.3d 543, 551-52 (6th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Scruggs, 549 F.2d 1097, 1104 (6th Cir.) (“Proof of knowledge, like proof of intent, is rarely established by direct evidence ... circumstantial evidence [and] independent facts from which an inference of the ultimate fact may rationally be drawn in light of common experience can be sufficient to support a jury’s determination”), ce rt. denied. 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 70 , 54 L.Ed.2d 81 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Woodyard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See, e.g., Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Singer v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.
Compare Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 , 543 & n. 3 (5th Cir.1976) (claims under 1934 Securities Exchange Act not arbitrable), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977) with Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., slip op.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wise v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 543 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); Greater Continental Corporation v. Schechter, 422 F.2d 1100 , 1103 (2d Cir.1970). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cunningham v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
See, e.g., Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 543 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); Greater Continental Corp. v. Schechter, 422 F.2d 1100 , 1103 (2d Cir.1970); Macchiavelli v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 384 F.Supp. 21, 27-28 (E.D.Cal. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc.
See also Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 544 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); Janmort Leasing Inc. v. Econo-Car International, Inc., 475 F.Supp. 1282, 1293 (E.D.N.Y.1979); Black v. Econo-Gar International, Inc., 404 F.Supp. 600, 602 (D.Mass.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perry v. Hartz Mountain Corp.
See, e.g., Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977) (balancing test); Malamud v. Sinclair Oil Corp., 521 F.2d 1142 (6th Cir. 1975) (zone of interests test); Reibert v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 471 F.2d 727 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 938 , 93 S.Ct. 1900 , 36 L.Ed.2d 399 (1973) (direct injury test); Mulvey v. Samuel Goldwyn Productions, 433 F.2d 1073 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 923 , 91 S.Ct. 1377 , 28 L.Ed.2d 662 (1971) (reasonable foreseeability test); Karseal Corp. v. Richfield Oi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George X
See, e.g., United States v. Ordner, 554 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir.), *604 cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); United States v. Lemons, 470 F.2d 135 (3d Cir. 1972) (per curiam), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 929 , 93 S.Ct. 2758 , 37 L.Ed.2d 157 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shapiro v. General Motors Corp.
See also the conclusion that the elaboration of the “factual matrix” as proposed in Cromar “recognizes that § 4 standing analysis is essentially a balancing test comprised of many constant and variable factors and that there is no talismanic test capable of resolving all § 4 standing problems.” Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 552 F.2d 90, 99 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 69 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 436 F.Supp. 1334 (N.D.Ill. 1977); see, also, Azzaro v. Harnett, 414 F.Supp. 473 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d., 553 F.2d 93 (2nd Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977). *78 The Wisconsin Fair Employment Act was designed to prevent discrimination in employment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pryor
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-1599.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: D. Colorado (1)
Ct. Cl. Certio-rari denied.