green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
G Cite
cited 7× by 1 distinct case ·
“especially reluctant to reverse for plain error when it is ‘invited’ ”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Michael A. Kakley
especially reluctant to reverse for plain error when it is 'invited
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp.
the court must look, in light of both the training of the patentee and the elements in the claimed invention which give it its novel quality, at what arts the patentee could reasonably be expected to consult in doing the inventing
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cook
See United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697, 705 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 860 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cook
See United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697, 705 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re American Continental Corporation/lincoln Savings & Loan Securities Litigation. Lexecon Inc. Daniel R. Fischel v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, a Partnership Patrick Coughlin William S. Lerach Kevin P. Roddy Leonard B. Simon Melvyn I. Weiss Patricia Hynes Michael C. Spencer Stephen R. Steinberg, in Re American Continental Corporation/lincoln Savings & Loan Securities Litigation. Lexecon Inc. Daniel R. Fischel v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, a Partnership Patrick Coughlin William S. Lerach Kevin P. Roddy Leonard B. Simon Melvyn I. Weiss Patricia Hynes Michael C. Spencer Stephen R. Steinberg, Cotchett, Illston & Pitre Joseph Cotchett Susan Illston, in Re American Continental Corporation/lincoln Savings & Loan Securities Litigation. Lexecon Inc. Daniel R. Fischel v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, a Partnership Patrick Coughlin William S. Lerach Kevin P. Roddy Leonard B. Simon Melvyn I. Weiss Patricia Hynes Michael C. Spencer Stephen R. Steinberg
See maj. op. at 1529-30 Although Judge Roll had nothing to do with this order, he may have been influenced by his colleague's strong feelings, and thus "we [might] consider prior judicial experience in such a situation more a negative than an affirmative reason for transfer." Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735, 739 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Leroy Price
See United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697, 705 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977) (error on one count harmless if unrelated to separate conviction with concurrent sentence); Appellee’s Br. at 39.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lennox v. Mull
See Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977); Ackert v. Pelt Bryan, 299 F.2d 65 (2d Cir.1962); Ellicott Machine Corporation v. Modern Welding Co., Inc., 502 F.2d 178 (4th Cir.1974); Auerbach v. United States, 347 F.2d 742 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 434 , 15 L.Ed.2d 362 (1965); Chicago, R.I. & P.R.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman D. Wright, United States of America v. George W. Kirby, Jr.
See United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697, 707 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Kent Smith v. United States
See United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697, 700 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977); United States v. Bayer, 331 U.S. 532, 542 , 67 S.Ct. 1394, 1399 , 91 L.Ed. 1654 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
Kash 'N Gold, Ltd. v. ATSPI, Inc.
See Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 133 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
ATSPI, INC. v. Sharper Image, Inc.
See Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735, 737-738 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977); Rhode Gear, U.S.A. v. Frank’s Spoke N. Wheel, Inc., 225 U.S.P.Q. 1256 , 1258 (D.Mass.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
P.S.I. Nordic Track, Inc. v. Great Tan, Inc.
See Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735, 738 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977) (rebuttable presumption that promptly brought declaratory judgment action in manufacturer’s forum should take precedence over customer action brought in jurisdiction where, manufacturer could not be sued); Rhode Gear U.S. A. v. Frank’s Spoke N. Wheel, Inc., 225 U.S.P.Q. 1256 , 1258 (D.Ma.1985) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Youker
See Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 (1977). 3 Thus, this court is without jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed.
cited
Cited "see"
Furmanite America, Inc. v. Durango Associates, Inc.
See Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735, 739 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Corporate Communications Consultants, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc.
See Digitronics Corp. v. New York Racing Association, Inc., 553 F.2d 740, 748 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 187 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carson Manufacturing Co. v. Carsonite International Corp.
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Tel-Design, Inc., 460 F.2d 625, 628 (9th Cir. 1972); see Kamei-Autokomfort v. Eurasian Automotive Prods., 553 F.2d 603, 605 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977); Alcor Aviation, Inc. v. Radair, Inc., 527 F.2d 113, 115 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3170 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carson Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Carsonite International Corporation, Inc.
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Tel-Design, Inc., 460 F.2d 625, 628 (9th Cir. 1972); see Kamei-Autokomfort v. Eurasian Automotive Prods., 553 F.2d 603, 605 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977); Alcor Aviation, Inc. v. Radair, Inc., 527 F.2d 113, 115 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 949 , 96 S.Ct. 3170 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Mitchell
See United States v. Riebold, 10 Cir., 557 F.2d 697, 708 , cert. denied 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 and Hanks v. United States, 10 Cir., 388 F.2d 171, 173 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan G. Rios
See United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697, 708 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 .
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Vefo Inc.
See Kamei-Autokomfort v. Eurasian Automotive Products, 553 F.2d 603, 607 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. VEFO Inc.
See Kamei-Autokomfort v. Eurasian Automotive Products, 553 F.2d 603, 607 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Rondeau
See United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697, 703 (10th Cir.) ("representation is competent unless it 'was perfunctory, in bad faith, a sham, a pretense or without adequate opportunity for conference or preparation’ ”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
North Carolina v. Department of Health, Education & Welfare
See Codex Corporation v. Milgo Electronic Corporation, 553 F.2d 735 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977), and Great Northern Railway v. National Railroad Adjustment Board, 422 F.2d 1187, 1193-94 (7th Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Corning Glass Works
See Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronics, 553 F.2d 735, 737-38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 (1977); Williams Gold Refining Co., Inc. v. Semi-Alloys, Inc., 434 F. Supp. 453, 455 (W.D.N.Y. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.
(2×)
See Frankford Hospital v. Blue Cross of Greater Philadelphia, 417 F. Supp. 1104, 1106 (ED Pa. 1976), aff’d, 554 F. 2d 1253 (CA3), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 860 (1977); State of Michigan, Commissioner of Ins., No. 77-R-101 (Mar. 3, 1977); State of Illinois, Dept. of Ins., Hearing No. 1607 (Apr. 8, 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norfin, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.
See, Burger Train Systems, Inc. v. Ballard, 552 F.2d 1377, 1381 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 132 (1977); Moore v. Schultz, 491 F.2d 294, 298 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 930 , 95 S.Ct. 203 , 42 L.Ed.2d 161 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Weldon Rushing Payne, Lloyd Earl Taylor
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977); United States v. Schmidt, 471 F.2d 385 (3d Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Brown-Bridge Mills, Inc. v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc., the Brown-Bridge Mills, Inc. v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Brown-Bridge Division
Prior art which is insufficiently similar to support anticipation ... may still render the claimed patent obvious in combining various elements." Shanklin Corp., supra, 521 F.2d at 617 ; see also Kamei-Autokomofort v. Eurasian Automotive Products, 553 F.2d 603, 607 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977) 8 The Count in the interference read in full: "A non-curling gummed paper comprising a paper base having adherent thereto a dry non-tacky water-activatable adhesive coating, said coating comprising as a dispersed phase discrete solid particles of water-activat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown-Bridge Mills, Inc. v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc.
Prior art which is insufficiently similar to support anticipation ... may still render the claimed patent obvious in combining various elements.” Shanklin Corp., supra, 521 F.2d at 617; see also Kamei-Autokomofort v. Eurasian Automotive Products, 553 F.2d 603, 607 (1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Philip Alan Froude, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, American Motorists Insurance Company
See, e.g., Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735, 737 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
See, e.g., Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp., 553 F.2d 735, 737 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Irvin v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Riebold, 557 F.2d 697 (10th Cir.) (one month), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860 , 98 S.Ct. 186 , 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977); United States v. Rastelli, 551 F.2d 902 (2d Cir.) (18 days), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 115 , 98 S.Ct. 115 , 54 L.Ed.2d 91 (1977); United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737 (9th Cir.1977) (4 days), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 , 98 S.Ct. 889 , 54 L.Ed.2d 795 (1978); United States v. Brugger, 549 F.2d (7th Cir.) (more than two weeks), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 (1977); United States v. Faulkner, 538 F.2d 724 (6th Cir.) (although attorney was retained immediately p…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amperex Electronic Corp.
v.
New York Racing Assn., Inc.
v.
New York Racing Assn., Inc.
77-179.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
434 U.S. 860
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · S.D. New York (1)
AMPEREX ELECTRONIC CORP.
v.
NEW YORK RACING ASSN., INC., ET AL.
No. 77-179.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 3, 1977.
1
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 553 F.2d 740.