United States v. Jacobs, 436 U.S. 31 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jacobs, 436 U.S. 31 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
168 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Itcaina v. Marble (nev, 1936-03-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1936 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1936 1981 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Itcaina v. Marble
Nev. · 1936 · confidence medium
In this respect, it is an advancement over the Idaho statute, which does not contain such a provision, but injunctions are granted in instances too numerous to mention. * * * Language used in a liquor case, decided in Eilenbecker v. District Court Plymouth County, 134 *436 U. S. 31, 40, 10 S. Ct. 424, 427 , 33 L.
examined Cited "see" United States v. Ming He, Also Known as Tony Jai (3×)
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jacobs, 547 F.2d 772, 776 (2d Cir.1976), cert. granted, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2647 , 53 L.Ed.2d 254 (1977), and cert. dismissed, 436 U.S. 31 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Caputo (3×)
E.D. Pa. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jacobs, 547 F.2d 772 (2d Cir.1976), cert, dismissed, 436 U.S. 31 [ 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 ] (1978), (failure to provide warnings to grand jury target); United States v. Estepa, 471 F.2d 1132 (2d Cir.1972) (repeated use of hearsay evidence before the grand jury).” United States v. Serubo, 604 F.2d at 816-17 ; see also United States v. Rosenfield, 780 F.2d 10 (3d Cir.1985).
examined Cited "see" Coplin v. United States (3×)
Ct. Cl. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jacobs, 547 F.2d 772, 777 (2d Cir.1976), cert. dismissed, 436 U.S. 31 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978) (purpose of Rule 402 "was to bar common law rules of evidence ... if inconsistent”).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Michael O. Myers, Angelo J. Errichetti, Louis Johanson, and Howard L. Criden, United States of America v. Frank Thompson, Jr. And John M. Murphy, United States of America v. Raymond F. Lederer (3×)
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jacobs, 531 F.2d 87 (2d Cir.), vacated mem., 429 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 299 , 50 L.Ed.2d 277 , reinstated, 547 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. dismissed, 436 U.S. 31 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Myers (2×)
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jacobs, 531 F.2d 87 (2d Cir.), vacated mem., 429 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 299 , 50 L.Ed.2d 277 , reinstated, 547 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. dismissed, 436 U.S. 81 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978).
examined Cited "see" In Re Carlos Rosario Pantojas (3×)
1st Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Jacobs, 547 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 31 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Payner (2×)
SCOTUS · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jacobs, 547 F. 2d 772, 777 (CA2 1976), cert. dism'd as improvidently granted, 436 U. S. 31 (1978).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Chandler Ex Rel. Estate of Knight v. H.E. Yerkes & Associates, Inc. (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Effective restraints against this type of egregious offense are therefore imperative.” United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564, 576 , 96 S.Ct. 1768, 1776 , 48 L.Ed.2d 212 (1976) (Burger, C.J.); see also United States v. Jacobs, 547 F.2d 772, 775 (2d Cir.1976) (“We abhor perjury ...”), cert. dismissed, 436 U.S. 31 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978); 18 U.S.C. § 1621 (five years imprisonment and/or $2,000 fine upon conviction for perjury). 3 b.
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Vinieris (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Washington, 431 U.S. 181, 189 , 97 S.Ct. 1814, 1819 , 52 L.Ed.2d 238 (1977) (“Because target witness status neither enlarges nor diminishes the constitutional protection against compelled self-incrimination, potential-defendant warnings add nothing of value to protection of Fifth Amendment rights.”); see also United States v. Jacobs, 547 F.2d 772, 773-75 (2d Cir.1976), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 436 U.S. 31 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978).
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Harvey Birdman, United States of America v. William Richman (3×)
3rd Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jacobs, 531 F.2d 87, 90 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded, 429 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 299 , 50 L.Ed.2d 277 , aff’d on remand, 547 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. dismissed, 436 U.S. 31 , 98 S.Ct. 1873 , 56 L.Ed.2d 53 (1978); United States v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES
v.
JACOBS, AKA "MRS. KRAMER"
76-1193.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 1978.
436 U.S. 31
Per Curiam.
Cited by 50 opinions  |  Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Deputy Solicitor General Frey reargued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General McCree, Assistant Attorney General Civiletti, William F. Sheehan III, and Jerome M. Feit.

Irving P. Seidman reargued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.