green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…oercing employees to give untrue testimony just as surely undermines the integrity of board proceedings as does coercing employees to give no testimony at all
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Surface v. NLRB
oercing employees to give untrue testimony just as surely undermines the integrity of board proceedings as does coercing employees to give no testimony at all
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Surface Cleaning, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
cjoercing employees to give untrue testimony just as surely undermines the integrity of board proceedings as does coercing employees to give no testimony at ah
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Surface v. NLRB
oercing employees to give untrue testimony just as surely undermines the integrity of board proceedings as does coercing employees to give no testimony at all
cited
Cited "see"
Gyadu v. Workers' Compensation Commission
See Smith v. U.S. Air Force, 566 F.2d 957 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 80 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Ryder System, Inc.
See NLRB v. Retail Store Employees Union, Local 876, 570 F.2d 586, 594 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Ryder System, Inc.
See NLRB v. Retail Store Employees Union, Local 876, 570 F.2d 586, 594 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. All Star Industries
See United States v. Boswell, 565 F.2d 1338, 1343 (5th Cir.) ("As a condition of probation a district court undoubtedly has the authority to require that a defendant make restitution to injured parties for the actual loss or damage caused by the offense for which he stands convicted . . . .") (citations omitted) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S. Ct. 81 (1978); see also United States v. Stuver, 845 F.2d 73, 76 (4th Cir. 1988) (holding that precise amount of loss for restitution purposes 24 See supra note 22. -25- 25 must be legally determined in the underlying criminal …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. All Star Industries, Midco Pipe & Tube Co., Richard A. Brazzale, Mannesmann International Alloys, Inc. (Mia)
See United States v. Boswell, 565 F.2d 1338, 1343 (5th Cir.) (“As a condition of probation a district court undoubtedly has the authority to require that a defendant make restitution to injured parties for the actual loss or damage caused by the offense for which he stands convicted....”) (citations omitted) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978); see also United States v. Stuver, 845 F.2d 73, 76 (4th Cir.1988) (holding that precise amount of loss for restitution purposes must be legally determined in the underlying criminal proceeding); Un…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Ira Black
See United States v. Boswell, 565 F.2d 1338, 1342-43 (5th Cir.) (upholding restitution of all funds deposited in defendants’ fraudulent scheme measured by a stipulation agreed to by the parties), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert A. Wallace, Jr. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenor
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. C.A.B., 574 F.2d 546, 549-50 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 82 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978); American Air Lines, Inc. v. C.A.B., 445 F.2d 891 , 895 (2d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1015 , 92 S.Ct. 674 , 30 L.Ed.2d 663 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brantley
See United States v. Boswell, 565 F.2d 1338, 1341-42 (5th Cir.) (finding harmless error under similar circumstances), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brantley
See United States v. Boswell, 565 F.2d 1338, 1341-42 (5th Cir.) (finding harmless error under similar circumstances), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Retail Delivery Drivers, Driver Salesmen, Produce Workers & Helpers Local 588 v. Servomation Corporation
See Delta Air Lines v. C.A.B., 574 F.2d 546, 550 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 82 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. The Civil Aeronautics Board
See Delta Air Lines v. CAB, 574 F.2d 546, 550 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 82 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garza
See, United States v. Kilrain, 566 F.2d 979, 984 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 80 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ridley
See also, United States v. Cooper, 1990 WL 67885 , 902 F.2d 1570 (6th Cir.1990) (“A bill of particulars is not a discovery device and should not be used ‘to obtain detailed disclosure of the government’s evidence prior to trial.’ United States v. Kilrain, 566 F.2d 979, 985 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 80 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978).”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pierro
See United States v. Gambino, 926 F.2d 1355, 1364 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1206 , 111 S.Ct. 2800 , 115 L.Ed.2d 973 & — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 415 , 116 L.Ed.2d 436 (1991); see also United States v. Kilrain, 566 F.2d 979, 982-83 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 80 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pierro
See United States v. ___ _____________ Gambino, 926 F.2d 1355, 1364 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. _______ _____ ______ 1206 & 112 S. Ct. 415 (1991); see also United States v. Kilrain, ___ ____ ______________ _______ 566 F.2d 979, 982-83 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 _____ ______ (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Neal v. Honeywell, Inc.
See also NLRB v. Retail Store Employees Union, 570 F.2d 586, 590 (6th Cir.1978) (following Scrivener), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pottorf
See, e.g., United States v. Kilrain, 566 F.2d 979, 985 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 80 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978); United States v. Baca, 494 F.2d 424, 426 (10th Cir.1974); United States v. Shoher, 555 F.Supp. 346, 349-50 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc., 501 F.Supp. at 810 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Burger
See, e.g., United States v. Kilrain, 566 F.2d 979, 985 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 80 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978); United States v. Baca, 494 F.2d 424, 426 (10th Cir.1974); United States v. Shoher, 555 F.Supp. 346, 349-50 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc., 501 F.Supp. at 810 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Campbell
See also United States v. Kilrain, 566 F.2d 979, 985 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 80 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978) (defendants are not entitled to use bill of particulars to discover all overt acts that might be proved at trial); United States v. Pena, 542 F.2d 292, 294 (5th Cir.1976) (defendant not entitled to use bill of particulars to obtain a list of witnesses).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Deadmond
See also United States v. Boswell, 565 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978); United States v. Buechler, 557 F.2d 1002 (3d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. Stafford Construction Company
See also Baker v. Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, 595 F.2d 746 (D.C.Cir.1978) (following Phillips). 28 Our reasoning is similar to that used by the Sixth Circuit in NLRB v. Retail Store Employees Union, Local 876, 570 F.2d 586 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 109 (1978), where the court construed Sec. 8(a)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tom E. Tiler, Roy Y. Sakai and Ty-Sak Agencies, Ltd.
See, e.g., United States v. Boswell, 565 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 819 , 99 S.Ct. 81 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978); United States v. Buechler, 557 F.2d 1002, 1007-08 (3d Cir. 1977); United States v. Follette, 32 F.Supp. 953 , 955 — 56 (E.D.Pa.1940) (Maris, C.J.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Strickland
v.
Georgia
v.
Georgia
No. 77-1430.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (3)
Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.