green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1980 ·
…better approach is for the trial court to honor any request of a jury to hear specific evidence, in the absence of some compelling reason why it should not be granted
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Verdugo
before the state is called upon to offer any evidence on the question of jurisdiction, there must be positive evidence that the offense occurred outside the jurisdiction of the court
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dixon v. State
(2×)
better approach is for the trial court to honor any request of a jury to hear specific evidence, in the absence of some compelling reason why it should not be granted
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirschner v. Office of Comptroller of New York
See Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America, 580 F.2d 1158, 1163 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979); see also Song v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 957 F.2d 1041 (2d Cir.1991) (reviewing conditional grant of new trial without discussion of reviewability); Samuels v. Health and Hospitals Corp., 591 F.2d 195, 198-99 (2d Cir.1979) (conditional new trial affirmed due to substantial question whether there had been a just determination of the action).
discussed
Cited "see"
59 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1101, 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,738 Joseph Kirschner and Irwyn Greif v. The Office of the Comptroller of the City of New York, Benedict Santeramo, and Harrison Goldin
See Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America, 580 F.2d 1158, 1163 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979); see also Song v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 957 F.2d 1041 (2d Cir.1991) (reviewing conditional grant of new trial without discussion of reviewability); Samuels v. Health and Hospitals Corp., 591 F.2d 195, 198-99 (2d Cir.1979) (conditional new trial affirmed due to substantial question whether there had been a just determination of the action). 38 However, we may consider on the appeal of the order conditionally granting a new trial onl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Patricia Finnegan v. Richard Fountain
See McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869, 870-71 (4th Cir.1978) (resubmission of questions to jury not permissible, despite apparent inconsistency, where answer to one question is decisive of the case), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,914 Michael Lynn Richard, Cross-Appellee v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Cross-Appellant v. Hardesty Tire Repair, Intervenor-Appellee
See McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869, 870-71 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979) (construed and approved in Perricone, 704 F.2d at 1380 ). 2 35 The basic question in the instant case, then, is whether it is possible to create a consistency between the answers contained in the verdict before the trial court resubmitted it.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
See McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869, 870-71 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979) (construed and approved in Perricone, 704 F.2d at 1380 ). 2 The basic question in the instant case, then, is whether it is possible to create a consistency between the answers contained in the verdict before the trial court resubmitted it.
discussed
Cited "see"
Amoco Production Company, and Texaco, Inc. v. Forest Oil Corporation
See Mott v. ODECO, 577 F.2d 273 , 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1978) (under Louisiana law, ambiguities in contracts are generally construed against the draftsman).
cited
Cited "see"
Cormier v. Gulf Oil Corp.
See Mott v. Ode- co, 577 F.2d 273 , 276 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Special Risk Ins. v. Delta America Re Ins.
See Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 580 F.2d 1158 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979); Auten v. Auten, 308 N.Y. 155 , 124 N.E.2d 99 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see"
AMF INC. v. Brunswick Corp.
See Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 580 F.2d 1158, 1162 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979) (“greatest interest” analysis favors application of New York law to contract dispute); S.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Seal Offshore, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc.
See Mott v. ODECO, 577 F.2d 273 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979); Brown v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Seal Offshore, Inc. And Sealcraft Operators, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc., Westinghouse Air Brake Co., and Wabco, Inc. v. E.F. Houghton, Third-Party
See Mott v. ODECO, 577 F.2d 273 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979); Brown v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Czurlanis v. Albanese
See McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869, 870-72 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Czurlanis v. Albanese
See McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869, 870-72 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanton v. Astra Pharmaceutical Products
See McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979). 39 The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has taken the opposite position and allows resubmission even under Rule 49(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanton v. Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.
See McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979). 39 The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has taken the opposite position and allows resubmission even under Rule 49(a).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Poindexter v. Board of County Commissioners
(2×)
Snyder v. City of Moab, 354 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir.2003) (citing Barker, 215 F.3d at 1137 ); see also McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869, 873 (4th Cir.1978) (holding that the nature of the relationship *920 between the sheriff and deputy was a question of fact to be determined by a jury), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New York Marine & General Insurance v. S/S \Ming Prosperity\""
See, e.g., Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Co. Of North America, 580 F.2d 1158, 1162 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979); Stroll v. Epstein, 818 F.Supp. 640 , 643 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.), affd, 9 F.3d 1537 (2d Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cashie v. Harris Corp.
See, e.g., McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979); Fuggitt v. Jones, 549 F.2d 1001 (5th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Drysdale Securities Corp.
Compare McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869, 871 (4th Cir.1978) (resubmission of interrogatories as to damages and defendant’s conduct after jury found no wrongful conduct by defendant held improper), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company v. Drysdale Securities Corporation
Compare McCollum v. Stahl, 579 F.2d 869, 871 (4th Cir.1978) (resubmission of interrogatories as to damages and defendant's conduct after jury found no wrongful conduct by defendant held improper), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1225 , 59 L.Ed.2d 460 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Incident Aboard
See, e.g., Mott v. ODECO, 577 F.2d 273 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979); Aymond v. Texaco, Inc., 554 F.2d 206 (5th Cir.1977); Law v. Sea Drilling Corp., 510 F.2d 242 , on rehearing, 523 F.2d 793 (5th Cir.1975) (rehearing denied on other grounds); Green v. Taca International Airlines, 304 So.2d 357 (La.1974); Carriage Meat Co., Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 442 So.2d 796 (La.App. 4th Cir.1983); Alan Abis, Inc. v. Burns Electronic Security Services, Inc., 283 So.2d 822 (La.App. 2d Cir.1973). 6 Cf. Seal Offshore, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc., 736 F.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cities Service Co. v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co.
See, e.g., Mott v. ODECO, 577 F.2d 273 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979); Aymond v. Texaco, Inc., 554 F.2d 206 (5th Cir.1977); Law v. Sea Drilling Corp., 510 F.2d 242 , on rehearing, 523 F.2d 793 (5th Cir.1975) (rehearing denied on other grounds); Green v. Taca International Airlines, 304 So.2d 357 (La.1974); Carriage Meat Co., Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 442 So.2d 796 (La.App. 4th Cir.1983); Alan Abis, Inc. v. Burns Electronic Security Services, Inc., 283 So.2d 822 (La.App. 2d Cir.1973). 6 Cf. Seal Offshore, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc., 736 F.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hilda Hegger, of the Estate of Fred P. Hegger, Plaintiff-Appellee v. George E. Green, and St. Luke's Hospital Center, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee
(2×)
Compare Galard v. Johnson, 504 F.2d 1198 , 1200 n.1 (7th Cir. 1974) and Nodak Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 533 F.2d 401, 410 (8th Cir. 1976) (in diversity case, issue whether a new trial should be granted based on excessiveness of damages is matter of federal law) with Index Fund v. Insurance Co. of North America, 580 F.2d 1158, 1163 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 461 (1979) (same issue left undecided) and Mehra v. Bentz, 529 F.2d 1137 , 1139 n.2a (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2628 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976) (assuming without decidin…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Irvin
v.
Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority
v.
Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority
No. 78-894.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Alaska Supreme Court (2) · Court of Appeals of Arizona (1)
Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.