green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2002–2016 · 2 courts ·
…it is settled law that the conspiracy which serves as the vehicle for the introduction of a vicarious admission by a co-conspirator need not be charged in the indictment.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 ·
…the new york eavesdropping statute was intended to conform 'state standards for court authorized eavesdropping warrants with federal standards.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Murgio
it is settled law that the conspiracy which serves as the vehicle for the introduction of a vicarious admission by a co-conspirator need not be charged in the indictment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Andrew Russo and Dennis C. Hickey
it is settled law that the conspiracy which serves as the vehicle for the introduction of a vicarious admission by a co-conspirator need not be charged in the indictment.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Falsetti
(2×)
the new york eavesdropping statute was intended to conform 'state standards for court authorized eavesdropping warrants with federal standards.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Amato
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 196 (2d Cir.) (finding that reversal of defendant’s conviction was not warranted given strong case against him despite court’s finding that district judge abused his discretion in evaluating evidence under Rule 403), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Porth v. State
See United States v. Rocco, 587 F.2d 144, 147-48 (3d Cir.1978), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eisen
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 186 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Tourine, 428 F.2d 865, 868-69 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eisen
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 186 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Tourine, 428 F.2d 865, 868-69 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1020 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 631 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Milagros Cota, Leoncio Hernandez, Altagracia Hernandez, Milagros Cota
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 194 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Marks v. State
See United States v. Rocco, 587 F.2d 144 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, La Duca v. United States, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bigelow v. State
See United States v. James, 609 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied 445 U.S. 905 , 100 S.Ct. 1082 , 63 L.Ed.2d 321 (1980), where the error was not substantial when viewed with the other evidence, so no substantial rights of the defendant were jeopardized and United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marrero
See United States v. Matthews, 589 F.2d 442, 445 (9th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979); United States v. Crippen, 570 F.2d 535, 538 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1069 , 99 S.Ct. 837 , 59 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); United States v. Williams, 552 F.2d 226, 229 (8th Cir.1977); United States v. Slawik, 548 F.2d 75, 86 (3d Cir.1977); United States v. Corr, 543 F.2d 1042, 1049 (2d Cir.1976); United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 1202, 1205 (7th Cir.1976); United States v. Long, 534 F.2d 1097, 1101 (3d Cir.1976); United States v. Parr, 516 F.2d 458, 470 (5…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cornel Everett and Timothy Scott
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 195 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Ravich, 421 F.2d 1196 , 1204 n. 10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 834 , 91 S.Ct. 69 , 27 L.Ed.2d 66 (1970); Prudential Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zuluaga
See generally United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 191 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Persico, 621 F.Supp. 842, 852 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gotti
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 194 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); see also United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603, 635-36, n. 25 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Thomas Nixon, David L. Snoddy and Donald E. Gilbreth, Defendant
See United States v. Bright, 588 F.2d 504, 512 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979) (government’s proffer of a letter of reprimand for stipulation and its willingness to reopen the case in an attempt to prove fact of defendants’ (an attorney) reprimand by a judge and the bar association demonstrated the necessary good faith factual basis for cross-examination of defense character witness, an attorney, regarding defendant’s reprimand).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard Bednar
See United States v. Rocco, 587 F.2d 144, 148 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979) (impeachability of new witness aided finding that new witness’ testimony would not produce an acquittal). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Borello
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 186 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Lewis Clark, Iii, and George R. Newton, Moody Nichols, Defendants
United States v. Clay, 495 F.2d 700, 708 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 937 , 95 S.Ct. 207 , 42 L.Ed.2d 164 (1974); see United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 189 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bolanle Lawal
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 196 (2d Cir.) (error harmless given the overwhelming evidence of guilt), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); see also Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 764-65 , 66 S.Ct. 1239, 1247-48 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) (nonconstitutional error harmless if it “did not influence the jury, or had but a very slight effect”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tuttle v. Chrysler Corp.
See Brengelmann v. Land Resources of New England and Canada, Inc., 393 A.2d 174 , 176 n. 3 (Me. 1978), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 971 , 99 S.Ct. 1535 , 59 L.Ed.2d 788 (1979) (discussing requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brian Patrick Smith
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 196 (2d Cir.) (error harmless given the. overwhelming evidence of guilt), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); see also Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 764-65 , 66 S.Ct. 1239, 1247-48 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) (nonconstitutional error harmless if it “did not influence the jury, or had but a very slight effect”); United States v. Corey, 566 F.2d 429, 432 (2d Cir.1977) (error “is harmless if it is ‘highly probable’ that the error did not contribute to the verdict”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Wuagneux
See United States v. Bright, 588 F.2d 504, 510 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Napolitano
United States v. Aloi, 511 F.2d 585, 598 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1015 , 96 S.Ct. 447 , 46 L.Ed.2d 386 (1975); see United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 191-92 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hively
See United States v. Bright, 588 F.2d 504, 512 (5th Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Gosser, 339 F.2d 102, 112 (6th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 819 , 86 S.Ct. 44 , 15 L.Ed.2d 66 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Artlet Smith
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 196 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); Chase v. Crisp, 523 F.2d 595, 598 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 1418 , 47 L.Ed.2d 354 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Muse
(2×)
See United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182 , 196 n.17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence David Ramapuram
(4×)
See United States v. Williams, 581 F.2d 451, 453 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979) ("Although the expectations of privacy test has done away with outmoded property concepts no longer satisfactory for fourth amendment analysis ... the distinction between open fields and curtilage is still helpful in determining the existence or not of reasonable privacy expectations."); cf. United States v. Alewelt, 532 F.2d 1165, 1168 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 840 , 97 S.Ct. 114 , 50 L.Ed.2d 109 (1976) (privacy expectations as to the pockets of a jacke…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dudley Bell
See United States v. Matthews, 589 F.2d 442, 445 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979); United States v. Crippen, 570 F.2d 535, 538 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1069 , 99 S.Ct. 837 , 59 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); United States v. Williams, 552 F.2d 226, 229 (8th Cir. 1977); United States v. Slawik, 548 F.2d 75, 86 (3d Cir. 1977); United States v. Corr, 543 F.2d 1042, 1049 (2d Cir. 1976); United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 1202, 1205 (7th Cir. 1976); United States v. Long, 534 F.2d 1097, 1101 (3d Cir. 1976); United States v. Parr, 516 F.2d 458, …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Collins
See Bordeaux, 84 F.3d at 1547 ; McGuire, 45 F.3d at 1187 ; see also United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 190 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Collins
See Bordeaux, 84 F.3d at 1547 ; McGuire, 45 F.3d at 1187 ; see also United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 190 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry
Where “defendants ... are jointly indicted [they] should be jointly tried.” United States v. Ventura, 724 F.2d 305, 312 (2d Cir.1983); see also, United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 191 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979) (presumption in favor of joint trials “conserves judicial resources, alleviates the burden on citizens serving as jurors, and avoids the necessity of having witnesses reiterate testimony in a series of trials”) (quoting United States v. Borelli, 435 F.2d 500, 502-03 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 946 , 91 S.Ct. 963 , 28 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nored v. State
(2×)
Accordingly, “warrantless searches are improper absent exigent circumstances, at least when the investigating officers have intruded upon the curtilage for the purpose of conducting a search for criminal activity.” Bower, 769 S.W.2d at 897 (emphasis added); See also United States v. Williams, 581 F.2d 451, 453 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murray v. State
United States v. Harvill, 501 F.2d 295, 297 (9th Cir.1974); compare United States v. Gaskins, 849 F.2d 454, 460 (9th Cir.1988) (charge repudiated counsel’s argument and required re *811 versal) with United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 189 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979) (charge did not directly repudiate counsel’s argument so no fundamental prejudice to defense) [and] United States v. Pena, 897 F.2d 1075, 1084 (11th Cir.1990) (diminished effectiveness purely counsel’s fault when the supplemental instruction did not substantially change the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Davis
Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the indictment should have been dismissed on the ground that his written statement, which was later suppressed as involuntary, was put into evidence before the Grand Jury (see, People v Brewster, 63 NY2d 419, 422 ; People v Oakley, 28 NY2d 309, 312 ; People v Estenson, 101 AD2d 687 ; see also, People v McGrath, 46 NY2d 12, 22 , cert denied 440 US 972 ; United States v Calandra, 414 US 338 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walka
See also United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 189-90 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 733 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Taft
See also United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 189-90 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 733 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
King v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. LaDuca, 447 F. Supp. 779 (D.N.J. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979), (holding that the exculpating testimony of a witness who had exercised his Fifth Amendment privilege at the defendant's trial was not newly discovered, but merely newly available; holding further that the defendant, in order to demonstrate diligence in producing the evidence, should have requested that the reluctant witness receive immunity; and affirmed on other grounds but criticized for the theory relative to "immunization" in United States v. Rocco, 587 F.2d …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Feola
See, e.g., United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 190 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kalevas
See also United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 190 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979). [44] See United States v. Carson, 702 F.2d 351, 366 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S.Ct. 2456 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1335 (1983); United States v. Losada, 674 F.2d 167, 171 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 2945 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1341 (1982); United States v. Sotomayor, 592 F.2d 1219, 1228 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 919 , 99 S.Ct. 2842 , 61 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979); United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 733 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 ,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kalevas
See also United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 190 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregory O. Daniels
(2×)
In weighing the prejudice resulting from joinder against the benefits flowing from it, the expeditious use of scarce judicial resources has been recognized as a "dominant concern." United States v. Nolan, 700 F.2d 479, 482 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 3095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1983); see also United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 191 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jimmy Dewitt Webster, Sr., Candido Daniel Santiago, Barry Weinreich, Joe Buhajla, Arthur Byron Murphy, and Clarence Royalston
See also United States v. Williams, 581 F.2d 451, 453 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Baldwin, 691 F.2d 718 (5th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Armand Ventura
See, e.g., United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 191 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Taylor, 562 F.2d 1345, 1362-63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 432 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 2958 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wheeler v. State
(2×)
Compare United States v. Williams, 581 F.2d 451 (5th Cir.1978), cert, denied 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Burgess
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 186 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979), and sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 194 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 794 (1979); United States v. Cafaro, 455 F.2d 323, 326 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Schulman v. United States, 406 U.S. 918 , 92 S.Ct. 1769 , 32 L.Ed.2d 117 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Matter. Appeal of United States of America
(2×)
See also United States v. Rocco, 587 F.2d 144, 147 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wood v. State
(2×)
See also People v. McGrath, 46 N.Y.2d 12 , 385 N.E.2d 541, 547 , 412 N.Y.S.2d 801 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S. Ct. 1535 , 59 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Valencia
See also United States v. DiPalermo, 660 F.2d 17 at 21 (2d Cir. 1979) (quoting United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 194 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979)) (“ ‘When in a criminal case the government seeks, under the co-conspirator rationale, to introduce as an admission the out-of-court statement of a declarant other than the defendant, the trial judge must make a preliminary determination that there is sufficient independent evidence to establish the following . (4) that both the declarant and the defendant participated in the conspiracy . .’ …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
4 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1197, 5 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 570 United States of America v. Jose Esteban Cambindo Valencia, Jose Manuel Escobar Orjuella, Federico Gonzalez, Alfonso Velasco, Mario Caicedo, Edgar Enrique Moreno Ortiz, Julio Francisco Bermudez Prado, Rafael Flores Valencia, Carmen Vivas, Freddie Williams, Jesus Losada, and Rosalinda Losada
See also United States v. Mallah, 503 F.2d 971 (2d Cir. 1974), Cert. denied, 420 U.S. 995 , 95 S.Ct. 1425 , 43 L.Ed.2d 671 (1975) 20 Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide 600 (Rand McNally 1979) 21 See also United States v. DiPalermo, 660 F.2d 17 at 21 (2d Cir. 1979) (quoting United States v. Lyles, 593 F.2d 182, 194 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979)) (" 'When in a criminal case the government seeks, under the co-conspirator rationale, to introduce as an admission the out-of-court statement of a declarant other than the defendant, the trial judge must…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tokheim
v.
Blume
v.
Blume
No. 78-1195.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1979.
Published
Ct. App. Iowa. Certiorari denied.