green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Harry James Seagrave v. A.A. Gomez, Warden
See United States v. McCall, 592 F.2d 1066, 1068 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deutcsh v. State
(2×)
See United States v. McCall, 592 F.2d 1066, 1068 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979)." United States v. Hayes, 794 F.2d 1348, 1352 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1086 , 107 S.Ct. 1289 , 94 L.Ed.2d 146 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCall v. United States
(2×)
See Harvey v. United States, 395 A.2d 92 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Reinstatement of Voorhees
See United States v. Voorhees, 593 F.2d 346 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979), for more details regarding his criminal conviction. .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jude R. Hayes
(2×)
See United States v. McCall, 592 F.2d 1066, 1068 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979). 20 The jury first asked:[Assuming Hayes is an expert on drug dependence and understands the consequences of Schedule II medication,] would Dr. Hayes be guilty of prescribing the med's charged in this case if after considering the above noted assumptions we felt that Dr. Hayes didn't prescribe them for drug maintenance or addiction and he prescribed the med's for other legitimate reasons such as moderate to severe pain that he sincerely felt existed in an…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Amado
See United States v. Gordon, 538 F.2d 914 (1st Cir.1976) (pro se defendant failed to appear for oral argument, arrest warrant outstanding), cer t. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2060 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Lang, Walter Soots, Ralph Smith and Rick Corder
Accord, United States v. McCall, 592 F.2d 1066, 1068-69 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brinda Defilippis
See United States v. McCall, 592 F.2d 1066, 1067 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schiller
See Harvey v. United States, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 92, 98 (1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979) (even where prosecutor reindicted after failure of plea bargain, governed by Bordenkircher, we nonetheless noted the preferred practice of bringing all the charges at the outset, unless there were compelling reasons for bringing a later charge such as new evidence). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington v. United States
See discussion infra. In Harvey v. United States, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 92 , cert, denied, 441 U.S. 936, 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 665 (1979), this court addressed a situation in which the prosecutor presented the defendant with the option of either pleading guilty to the counts in the indictment or face trial on those counts as well as another, more severe charge and life papers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Jackson and Anthony Wayne Browning, United States of America v. Michael Ryan
See also United States v. Luddington, 589 F.2d 236, 241 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979) (“[IJnternational traffic for checkpoint testing purposes must include traffic originating close to the border but on the American side, since vehicles which remain in this country and await their illegal human cargo are a principal means of alien smuggling.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis Johnson
As the former Fifth Circuit has noted on numerous occasions, “when the jury is properly instructed on the standards for reasonable doubt, such an additional instruction on circumstantial evidence is confusing and incorrect.” United States v. Stokes, 471 F.2d 1318, 1321 (5th Cir.1973), citing, Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121 , 75 S.Ct. 127 , 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954); see also United States v. Clements, 588 F.2d 1030, 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2062 , 60 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979) ; United States v. Washington, 550 F.2d 320, 327 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 841 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jiles, Anthony, Eliecer
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Moreno, 588 F.2d 490 , 494 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 2061 , 60 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979). 3 A third group of cases falls between these two extremes and it is in this group that the balancing becomes most difficult.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DiSilvestro
v.
Veterans' Administration
v.
Veterans' Administration
No. 78-6472.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 1979.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.