green
Positive treatment
10.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. John C. Mueller
Among those cases finding that a failure to give notice before entry may violate the fourth amendment as well as section 3109 are United States v. Agrusa, 541 F.2d 690, 697 (8th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1045 , 97 S.Ct. 751 , 50 L.Ed.2d 759 (1977); United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 830 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 *344 (1979); United States v. Baker, 638 F.2d 198, 202 (10th Cir.1980); United States v. Francis, 646 F.2d 251, 258 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082 , 102 S.Ct. 637 , 70 L.Ed.2d 616 (1981); United States v. Nolan, 7…
discussed
Cited "see"
Porter v. United States
(2×)
See Sheffield v. United States, 397 A.2d 963 , 965 n. 1 (D.C. 1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2414 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979); see also United States v. Williams, 324 U.S.App.
discussed
Cited "see"
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7838, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,902 Kathy Monteiro, Individually, as the Legal Guardian of Her Minor Daughter Jane Doe, and on Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated Individuals v. The Tempe Union High School District, a Political Subdivision of the State of Arizona, and Daniel Perkins, Randy Clawson, Richard Foreman and Steven Rich, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Governing Board of the Tempe Union High School District
See De La Cruz v. Tormey, 582 F.2d 45, 58 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2416 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1979); see also Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 , 96 S.Ct. 2040 , 48 L.Ed.2d 597 (1976) (requiring showing of intentional discrimination).
discussed
Cited "see"
Monteiro ex rel. Jane Doe v. Tempe Union High School District
See De La Cruz v. Tormey, 582 F.2d 45, 58 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2416 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1979); see also Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 , 96 S.Ct. 2040 , 48 L.Ed.2d 597 (1976) (requiring showing of intentional discrimination).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. United States
(2×)
See Sheffield v. United States, 397 A.2d 963, 967 (D.C.) (“where the loss of evidence is the result of no bad faith on the part of the government, the trial court may decline to apply sanctions”), cer t. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2414 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979); Lee v. United States, 385 A.2d 159, 164 (D.C.1978) (a showing of substantial prejudice is necessary to justify reversal under Rule 16); Reed v. United States, 383 A.2d 316, 320-21 (D.C.) (trial court did not abuse discretion in refusing to give missing notes instruction where officer lost his notes of a victim’s description o…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. John J. Murray
(4×)
See United States v. Allen, 588 F.2d 1100, 1102-04 (5th Cir.) (eleven days of surveillance over a five month period sufficient for inference of substantially continuous operation), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979); United States v. Nerone, 563 F.2d 836, 843-44 (7th Cir.1977) (weekend casino operation sufficient to show substantial continuity of operation), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
People v. Gifford
(4×)
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979) (knock and announce requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3109 incorporated into fourth amendment). [5] This result is not contrary to our holdings in People v. Towery, 194 Colo. 486 , 573 P.2d 104 (1978); People v. Campbell, 185 P.2d 312 , 524 P.2d 73 (1974); and People v. Malone, 175 Colo. 31 , 485 P.2d 499 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gaines
(2×)
See U.S. v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824 , 830 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979); U.S. v. Gable, 276 F.Supp. 555, 557 (E.D.Pa.1967), aff'd, 401 F.2d 765 (3d Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Trinidad Terrazas-Carrasco
See United States v. Watson, 591 F.2d 1058 , 1061 n. 2 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2414 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1979); United States Fifth Cir. Judges Ass’n, Pattern Jury Instructions/Criminal Cases, at 40 (West 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Tacy
(2×)
(United States v. Bustamente-Gamez (9th Cir. 1973) 488 F.2d 4, 9 , cert. den. (1974) 416 U.S. 970 [ 40 L.Ed.2d 559 , 94 S.Ct. 1993 ]; accord, United States v. Valenzuela (9th Cir. 1979) 596 F.2d 824, 830 , cert. den. (1979) 441 U.S. 965 [ 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 ].) We think the foregoing cases provide ample federal authority for the proposition that statutory “knock-notice” requirements, either federal or state, have their roots in the concept of “reasonableness” which lies in the core of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barbara Behanna and William Galemoor
(2×)
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 830-31 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979); Williams, 418 F.2d 159, 162-63 ; Delgado v. United States, 327 F.2d 641, 642 (9th Cir.1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Bossetta-Goodman v. Datacom Systems Corp.
See De La Cruz v. Tormey, 582 F.2d 45, 48 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2416 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Porter Williams
See United States v. Watson, 591 F.2d 1058, 1061 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Edward Taylor, Peter Martin, Sr., Elizabeth King, and Gerald White
See generally United States v. Watson, 591 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2414 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1979); United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Rodriguez and Jennifer West
(2×)
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 830-31 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979); Williams, 418 F.2d 159, 162-63 ; Delgado v. United States, 327 F.2d 641, 642 (9th Cir.1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Allen Hendricks
(2×)
See United States v. Foster, 711 F.2d 871, 878 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1602 , 80 L.Ed.2d 132 (1984) (to justify the search of a residence, the facts supporting the warrant must show probable cause to believe that the evidence sought is currently in the place to be searched, (citing United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 828 (9th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979) (emphasis added)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Evelyn Soto
(2×)
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 831 (9th Cir.) (proof insufficient of wife’s participation in conspiracy with husband to distribute narcotics, since “mere joint occupancy is at best equivocal”), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Petersen
(2×)
See U.S. v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. *677 1979) cert. den. 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 .
examined
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Iannaccio
(4×)
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
(2×)
See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 830 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979). .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Nancy Baker and William James Reeder
(4×)
See United States v. Popejoy, 578 F.2d 1346 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 896 , 99 S.Ct. 257 , 58 L.Ed.2d 243 (1978). 11 The question before us is whether the officers' conduct was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. 6 See United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 829-30 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Schultz
(2×)
See id.; see also United States v. Allen, 588 F.2d 1100, 1102-04 (5th Cir.) (eleven days of surveillance over a five month period sufficient for inference of substantially continuous operation), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979); United States v. Nerone, 563 F.2d 836, 843-44 (7th Cir.1977) (weekend casino operation sufficient to show substantial continuity of operation), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Odell McKinney
See also United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 828-29 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 (1979). 7 These cases are dispositive of McKinney's claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lukens
See, e.g., United States v. Watson, 591 F.2d 1058, 1061-1062 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2414 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1979); United States v. Davis, 459 F.2d 167, 170 (6th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose M. Cruz Jimenez
See also United States v. Watson, 591 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2414 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1979); United States v. Poole, 495 F.2d 115, 124 (D.C.Cir.1974) (Leventhal, J., concurring), cer t. denied, 422 U.S. 1048 , 95 S.Ct. 2667 , 45 L.Ed.2d 701 (1975); United States v. Halbert, 436 F.2d 1226, 1231 (9th Cir.1970).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Nates
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 830 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom., Lizarraga v. United States, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ospina
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Foster, 711 F.2d 871, 878 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1602 , 80 L.Ed.2d 132 (1984), citing United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824, 828 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979), (justification for a search of a residence must be based upon probable cause to believe the evidence sought is presently in the place to be searched).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fernando Francis, United States of America v. Clara Francis, and Fernando Francis
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 2415 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1979); United States v. Murrie, 534 F.2d 695, 698 (6th Cir. 1976) (the conditions of § 3109 for forcible entry explicate fundamental purposes of the fourth amendment, and failure to observe them may be unreasonable under the amendment); United States v. Mapp, 476 F.2d 67, 75 (2d Cir. 1973) (Sabbath v. United States merged § 3109 and the fourth amendment); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larry P. v. Riles
See, e. g., De La Cruz v. Tormey, 582 F.2d 45 (9th Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 441 U.S. 965, 99 S.Ct. 2416 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1979); cf. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization, 441 U.S. 600, 99 S.Ct. 1905 , 60 L.Ed.2d 508 (1979). 73 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boggs
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-6584.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1979.
Cited by 114 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.