green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Knapp
“Whether a defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his or her rights to remain silent and to an attorney is determined upon an inquiry into the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation” (People v Santos, 112 AD3d 757 , 758 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1158 [2014] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Williams, 62 NY2d at 288 ), including the defendant’s “age, experience, education, background, and intelligence, and . . . whether he [or she] has the capacity to understand the warnings given him [or her], the nature of his [or her] Fifth Amendment rights, and the c…
discussed
Cited "see"
KNAPP, ROBERT M., PEOPLE v
“Whether a defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his or her rights to remain silent and to an attorney is determined upon an inquiry into the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation” (People v Santos, 112 AD3d 757, 758 , lv denied 22 NY3d 1158 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Williams, 62 NY2d at 288 ), including the defendant’s “age, experience, education, background, and intelligence, and . . . whether he [or she] has the capacity to understand the warnings given him [or her], the nature of his [or her] Fifth Amendment rights, and the consequences of…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Knapp
“Whether a defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his or her rights to remain silent and to an attorney is determined upon an inquiry into the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation” (People v Santos, 112 AD3d 757 , 758 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1158 [2014] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Williams, 62 NY2d at 288 ), including the defendant’s “age, experience, education, background, and intelligence, and . . . whether he [or she] has the capacity to understand the warnings given him [or her], the nature of his [or her] Fifth Amendment rights, and the c…
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas v. Commonwealth
See Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 725 , reh’g denied, 444 U.S. 887 (1979); Venable v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 358, 359 , 404 S.E.2d 74, 75 (1991); Shell v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 247, 252 , 397 S.E.2d 673, 676 (1990); Goodwin v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 249, 253 , 349 S.E.2d 161, 163-64 (1986). *330 III.
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel Eubanks, M.D. v. Wallace Wilkinson
(2×)
See Baird v. Bellotti, 450 F.Supp. 997 (D.Mass.1978), aff'd, 443 U.S. 622 , 99 S.Ct. 3035 , 61 L.Ed.2d 797 , reh'd denied, 444 U.S. 887 , 100 S.Ct. 185 , 62 L.Ed.2d 121 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marsh v. Flint Board of Education
See Oliver v. Michigan State Board of Education, 508 F.2d 178 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 963 , 95 S.Ct. 1950 , 44 L.Ed.2d 449 (1975), disapproved on other grounds, Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526 , 99 S.Ct. 2971 , 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979), reh. denied, 444 U.S. 887 , 100 S.Ct. 186 , 62 L.Ed.2d 121 (1979); NAACP v. Lansing Board of Education, 429 F.Supp. 583 (W.D.Mich. 1976), aff’d, 559 F.2d 1042 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 997 , 98 S.Ct. 635 , 54 L.Ed.2d 491 (1977) (assigning black employees to schools with greater black populations creates and streng…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dixon
See Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 197 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 , reh. denied, 444 U.S. 887 , 62 L.Ed. 2d 121 , 100 S.Ct. 168 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of CH
See Bellotti v. Baird (1979), 443 U.S. 622 , 99 S.Ct. 3035 , 61 L.Ed.2d 797 (reh. den. 444 U.S. 887 , 100 S.Ct. 185 , 62 L.Ed.2d 121 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. J. M. v. Taylor
See generally Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 , 61 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979), reh. denied, 444 U.S. 887 ; Daniels v. State, 226 Ga. 269 , 174 S.E.2d 422 (1970); Commonwealth v. Smith, 472 Pa. 492 , 372 A.2d 797 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.O. v. Diocese of Brooklyn
The privilege 'may not be invoked to enshroud conversations with wholly secular purposes solely because one of the parties to the conversation happened to be a religious minister' (id.; see also Matter of Keenan v Gigante, 47 NY2d 160, 166 , 390 N.E.2d 1151 , 417 N.Y.S.2d 226 [1979], cert denied 444 US 887 [1979] ["(t)he priest-penitent privilege arises not because statements are made to a clergyman.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Krystal G. v. Roman Catholic Diocese
The privilege “may not be invoked to enshroud conversations with wholly secular purposes solely because one of the parties to the conversation happened to be a religious minister” {id.; see also Matter of Keenan v Gigante, 47 NY2d 160, 166 [1979], cert denied 444 US 887 [1979] [“(t)he priest-penitent privilege arises not because statements are made to a clergyman.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. J.G.
See e.g., Keenan v. Gigante, 47 N.Y.2d 160 , 417 N.Y.S.2d 226 , 390 N.E.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 887 , 100 S.Ct. 181 , 62 L.Ed.2d 118 (1979) (finding privilege was inapplicable to defendant’s communications to priest where the communications were made for purpose of securing defendant’s admittance into a work release program); Burger v. State, 238 Ga. 171 , 231 S.E.2d 769 (1977) (holding defendant could not claim privilege concerning conversation with a clergy member who was his friend and frequent companion regarding defendant’s intent to kill his wife and her lover).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. JG
See e.g., Keenan v. Gigante, 47 N.Y. 2d 160 , 417 N.Y.S. 2d 226 , 390 N.E. 2d 1151 (1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 887 , 100 S.Ct. 181 , 62 L.Ed. 2d 118 (1979) (finding privilege was inapplicable to defendant's communications to priest where the communications were made for purpose of securing defendant's admittance into a work release program); Burger v. State, 238 Ga. 171 , 231 S.E. 2d 769 (1977) (holding defendant could not claim privilege concerning conversation with a clergy member who was his friend and frequent companion regarding defendant's intent to kill his wife and her lover).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State in Interest of RDS
See, e.g., Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 725 , 99 S.Ct. 2560, 2572 , 61 L.Ed.2d 197 (1979), reh’g den., 444 U.S. 887 , 100 S.Ct. 186 , 62 L.Ed.2d 121 (1979); State in re T.S.V., 607 P.2d 827, 828 (Utah 1980) (The admissibility of a juvenile’s statements depends on a knowing and voluntary waiver of rights as viewed within the totality of circumstances.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Milwaukee v. K.F.
(2×)
See also McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971).” The rationale underlying the need for special sensitivity regarding the application of constitutional principles to children was explained in Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622, 634 (plurality), reh’g denied 444 U.S. 887 (1979), as a need to accommodate the following: "the peculiar vulnerability of children; their inability to make critical decisions in an informed, mature manner; and the importance of the parental role in child rearing.” Significantly, the state’s augmented authority over children has been recognized as most approp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Carpentieri
(2×)
Id. at 1173 n. 6; see also People v. Minjares, 24 Cal.3d 410 , 153 Cal.Rptr. 224, 228-230 , 591 P.2d 514 , 519-520 n. 6 (Sup.Ct.1979), ce rt. den., 444 U.S. 887 , 100 S.Ct. 181 , 62 L.Ed.2d 117 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
Minjares
v.
Minjares
No. 79-145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Blackmun, Certiorari.
Cited by 27 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist would grant certiorari.