green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. Oklahoma ex rel. Thompson
But see Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. Arapahoe & Shoshone Tribes, 623 F.2d 682 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1118 , 101 S.Ct. 931 , 66 L.Ed.2d 847 (1981), in which this Court found federal jurisdiction to hear a suit against a tribe after the state and tribal courts had refused to hear it.
cited
Cited "see"
Ute Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior of the United States
See id. at 1309-12 (discussing Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. Arapahoe and Shoshone Tribes, 623 F.2d 682 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1118 , 101 S.Ct. 931 , 66 L.Ed.2d 847 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carney v. State
See Bassett v. State, 449 So.2d 803, 808 (Fla. 1984), quoting Brown v. State, 381 So.2d 690, 696 (Fla. 1980), cert. den., 449 U.S. 1118 , 101 S.Ct. 931 , 66 L.Ed.2d 847 (1981); see also, Jackson v. Wainwright, 421 So.2d 1385, 1388 (Fla. 1982), cert. den., ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 3572 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1412 (1983); Straight v. State, 397 So.2d 903 (Fla. 1981), cert. den., 454 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 556 , 70 L.Ed.2d 418 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Cannady v. State
See Brown v. State, 381 So.2d 690 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1118 , 101 S.Ct. 931 , 66 L.Ed.2d 847 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shortbull v. Looking Elk
See Means v. Wilson, 522 F.2d at 838-39 . 27 We are thus presented with a situation in which Shortbull has no remedy within the tribal machinery nor with the tribal officials in whose election he cannot participate, compare Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. Arapahoe & Shoshone Tribes, 623 F.2d 682, 685 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1118 , 101 S.Ct. 931 , 66 L.Ed.2d 847 (1981), unless and until Congress provides otherwise.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sulcer v. Davis
See also Wheeler v. Swimmer, 835 F.2d 259, 261 (10th Cir.1987) ("The only federal relief available under the Indian Civil Rights Act against a tribe or its officers is a writ of habeas corpus."). 9 Plaintiff, relying on Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. Arapahoe & Shoshone Tribes, 623 F.2d 682 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1118 (1981), argues that because the tribal forum has been denied to her, she is entitled to seek relief in federal court.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Houghtaling
See, e.g., Dry Creek Lodge, Inc. v. Arapahoe and Shoshone Tribes, 623 F.2d 682 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1118 , 101 S.Ct. 931 , 66 L.Ed.2d 847 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Taylor
Compare Elledge v. State, 346 So.2d 998 (Fla.1977) with Brown v. State, 381 So.2d 690 (Fla.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1118 , 101 S.Ct. 931 , 66 L.Ed.2d 847 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shoshone Tribe
v.
Dry Creek Lodge, Inc.
v.
Dry Creek Lodge, Inc.
No. 80-613.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1981.
Brennan, Certiorari, Marshall.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of Pueblo of Cochiti et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Cer-tiorari denied.
Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.