green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
As Chief Justice Rogers recognizes, however, the issue of the appropriate- ness of the rule in Holliman is not directly presented in the present case and, therefore, the issue is not before us. 19 It is clear, therefore, that the defendant’s claim that the victim’s identifi- cation of the defendant was inadmissible because it involved unduly sugges- tive private conduct and the state did not show an independent basis for it; see State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 656 , 431 A.2d 501 (when identification was affected by unduly suggestive police procedures, identification is never- theless admissi…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
See State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619 , 639 n.10, 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. United States
See § Treas.Reg. 1.274-2(c)(4). 18 *619 The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the deductibility of business entertainment expenses in Berkley Machine Works & Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 623 F.2d 898 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 317 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Henry J. Langer Patricia K. Langer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Berkley Mach. *1200 Works & Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 623 F.2d 898, 906-07 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 919, 101 S.Ct. 317 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Harvey
See State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Magnotti v. Meachum
State v. Smith, 198 Conn. 147, 157 , 502 A.2d 874 (1985); State v. Johnson, 190 Conn. 541, 548-49 , 461 A.2d 981 (1983); see State v. Gold, [ 180 Conn. 619, 646 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boyd
Ed 2d 297 (1973)], and in accord with rule 804 (b) (3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 8 which provides that trustworthy third party statements against penal interest which are exculpatory to the defendant are admissible if the declarant is unavailable.” State v. Bryant, 202 Conn. 676, 692 , 523 A.2d 451 (1987); see State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 630 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Warren
See State v. Rogers, supra. Because we have found that the evidence proffered by the defendant was properly excluded as irrelevant and collateral, we need not address the defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of the rape victims shield law. “‘We have held on numerous occasions that the court will not pass upon a constitutional question if there is present some other ground upon which the case may be decided.’ Hartford v. Powers, 183 Conn. 76, 84-85 , 438 A.2d 824 (1981) and cases cited therein, including State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 639-40 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U…
cited
Cited "see"
Brick Masons Pension Trust v. Industrial Fence & Supply, Inc.
See NLRB v. Big Bear Supermarkets No. 3, 640 F.2d 924 , 928-29 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 318 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Brick Masons Pension Trust v. Industrial Fence & Supply, Inc.
See NLRB v. Big Bear Supermarkets No. 3, 640 F.2d 924 , 928-29 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 318 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980). 6 In deciding whether two firms are alter egos for the purpose of federal labor law, courts consider such factors as whether they have interrelated operations, common management, centralized control over labor relations, and common ownership.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hovey
See United States v. Milestone, 626 F.2d 264 , 266 n. 2 (3d Cir.) (jurisdictional defects subject to collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980), citing Thor v. United States, 554 F.2d 759, 762 (5th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmer v. Kawaguchi Iron Works, Ltd.
See Neiman v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., 619 F.2d 1189, 1193 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980); Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corp., 87 Ill.2d 190 , 429 N.E.2d 847 , 57 Ill.Dec. 730 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sea Lift, Inc. v. Refinadora Costarricense De Petroleo, S.A., a Foreign Corporation, Referred to as Recope
The district court found only that a price "was eventually agreed upon.” Given the posture of the case we follow Sea Lift’s account of the facts where there is a divergence except where that account is contradicted by findings of the district court. *992 See Product Promotions, Inc. v. Cousteau, 495 F.2d 483, 491 (5th Cir.1974); accord Neiman v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., 619 F.2d 1189, 1190 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Reilly v. DiBianco
See State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Wellington, United States of America v. Jerome C. Utz
Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(d) advisory committee note (citation omitted); see United States v. Milestone, 626 F.2d 264, 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carpenters' Local Union No. 1478 v. Neal Stevens, Neal Stevens v. Carpenters' Local Union No. 1478 Southern California Conference of Carpenters
(2×)
See NLRB v. Big Bear Supermarkets # 3, 640 F.2d 924 , 928 n. 5 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 318 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980). 15 The single employer and alter ego doctrines function differently, however. 6 To impose a labor agreement on a nonsignatory company under the single employer doctrine, the employees of both companies must be shown to constitute a single bargaining unit. 7 Such a showing is not required under the alter ego doctrine.
cited
Cited "see"
Anthony Nogueira v. United States
See United States v. Milestone, 626 F.2d 264 , 267 n.2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sullivan (Dissent)
So, too, prosecutorial impro- 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 0 Conn. 0 ,0 5 State v. Sullivan prieties that inject a prosecutor’s own knowledge into a trial are harmful because jurors might improperly carry that knowledge into their deliberations, which constitutes ‘‘a form of unsworn and unchecked testi- mony [that is] particularly difficult for the jury to ignore because of the prosecutor’s special position.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Gibson, 302 Conn. 653, 660 , 31 A.3d 346 (2011); see also State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 659 , 431 A.2d 501 (‘‘[t]he pr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Marquez
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 656 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rehman v. State University of New York at Stony Brook
(2×)
See id. (collecting cases); see also Jones v. Kneller, 482 F.Supp. 204, 210 (E.D.N.Y.1979) (contractual right of tenure review and confrontation held not to give rise to Fourteenth Amendment property interest), aff'd mem., 633 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 318 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
State v. Rivera, supra, 268 Conn. 370 ; see also State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 634 , 431 A. 2d 501 (confession made within three months of murders trustworthy), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Snelgrove
The statement was made two to three years after the murder and the defendant’s arrest; compare State v. Rivera, supra, 268 Conn. 370 (statement made within five months of murder and before defendant’s arrest trustworthy) and State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 634 , 431 A.2d 501 (confession made within three months of murders trustworthy), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rivera
Compare State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 634 , 431 A.2d 501 (confession made within three months of murders trustworthy), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hexacomb Corp. v. Damage Prevention Products Corp.
Id. at 279 ; see also Neiman v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., 619 F.2d 1189, 1193 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980) (holding that a lunch meeting in Illinois on terms of contract is sufficient to support specific jurisdiction); Ogden Engineering Corp. v. St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William C. Kelly, III v. United States
See also United States v. Milestone, 626 F.2d 264 , 267 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980) (observing, before Frady, that “although petitioner did not raise this issue on direct appeal, collateral review is available under § 2255 to correct jurisdictional errors”); Thor v. United States, 554 F.2d 759, 762 (5th Cir.1977) (“Jurisdictional defects are always subject to attack under section 2255, as that statute expressly states”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vincent
Ed. 2d 413 (1990); State v. Morrill, 205 Conn. 560, 564-65 , 534 A.2d 1165 (1987); see also State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 650 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Liptak
Ed. 2d 1247 (1968); see also State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 655 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dennis Frank Sazenski, United States of America v. Edward William MacDonald
See, e.g., United States v. Milestone, 626 F.2d 264, 266-67 (3d Cir.) (" * * * it has been held that even if the defendant consented to an amendment, jurisdiction would not be conferred on the court, although this proposition is questionable today since Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(b) permits a defendant to waive an indictment altogether in noncapital cases.’’) (citations and footnote omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980); C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
AM International Leasing Corp. v. National Council of Negro Women, Inc.
Id.; see also Neiman v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., 619 F.2d 1189, 1190 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Uni-Bond, Ltd. v. Schultz
Wisconsin Electrical Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Pennant Products, Inc., 619 F.2d 676, 677-678 (7th Cir.1980); see also Nieman v. Rudolf Wolff & Company, Ltd., 619 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980) (issued on the same day as Pennant Products and holding that a defendant’s meeting with the plaintiff in the forum state to solicit business and negotiate the subject contract likewise distinguishes Lakeside and authorizes personal jurisdiction).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gimbel
See also United States v. Milestone, 626 F.2d 264, 269 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fullwood
Compare State v. Maturo, 188 Conn. 591, 594-96 , 452 A.2d 642 (1982) (four man lineup consisting of individuals found near crime scenes not unnecessarily suggestive where suspects of different heights and the defendant was the only one with a mustache) with State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 655 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meridian Wood Products Co., Inc., a Corporation v. United States of America, Harry F. Lenton and Colleen Lenton v. United States
See also Berkley Machine Works & Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 623 F.2d 898, 906 (4th Cir.), (same) cert. denied 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 317 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980); Lewis v. Commissioner, 560 F.2d 973 , 977 *1189 (9th Cir.1977) (entertainment expenses must meet substantiation requirements).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Park Industries
Id.; see also Neiman v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., 619 F.2d 1189, 1190 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson ex rel. Carson v. Park Industries, Inc.
Id.; see also Neiman v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., 619 F.2d 1189, 1190 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 319 , 66 L.Ed.2d 148 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.
See, e.g., N.L.R.B. v. Big Bear Supermarket No. 3, 640 F.2d 924 , 930-31 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 318 , 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Acquin
See, e.g., State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619, 630 , 431 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Frye
See also State v. Gold, 180 Conn. 619 , 430 A.2d 501 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 920 , 101 S. Ct. 320 , 66 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Suburban Realty Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-228.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1980.
Cited by 57 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.