green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
JOHN R. THOMAS v. STATE OF MISSOURI
See Missouri v. Brown, 450 U.S. 1027 (1981), reexamined Brown v. State, 619 S.W.2d 68 (Mo. banc 1981), judgment vacated Missouri v. Haggard, 459 U.S. 1192 (1983). 4 Point 3/Claim 8(c) – Right to Counsel Thomas, who appeared without counsel when the 120-day-callback option was rescinded, claims the plea court erred in not first appointing him a lawyer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony J. Larette v. Paul Delo
See State v. Little, 674 S.W.2d 541, 543-44 (Mo. banc 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1029 , 105 S.Ct. 1398 , 84 L.Ed.2d 786 (1985), and State v. Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423, 431-36 (Mo.Ct.App.1980), vacated on other grounds sub nom., Missouri v. Brown, 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Consolidated Appeals of Certain Timber Companies From the Denial of Use Value Assessment & Taxation by Certain Counties
See Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659 , reh. denied, 450 U.S. 1027 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Bergmann v. City of Melrose
See Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456, 464 , 101 S.Ct. 715, 723-24 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659 (1981), reh’g denied, 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Passante
See Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. 449 U.S. 456, 471 , 101 S.Ct. 715, 727 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 659 (1981), reh. denied 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 222 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ostrosky
(2×)
See Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456, 464 , 101 S.Ct. 715, 723 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659, 668-69 , reh'g denied, 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981); Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93, 111-12 , 99 S.Ct. 939, 949 , 59 L.Ed.2d 171, 184-85 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Santini v. Lyons
See Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456, 461 , 101 S.Ct. 715, 722 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659, 667 , reh. denied, 450 U.S. 1027, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981); Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 487 , 90 S.Ct. 1153, 1162 , 25 L.Ed.2d 491, 503 , reh. denied, 398 U.S. 914 , 90 S.Ct. 1684 , 26 L.Ed.2d 80 (1970); Sweetman v. Town of Cumberland, 117 R.I. 134, 151 , 364 A.2d 1277, 1288 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hasenbein v. Siebert
Moreover, the statute is a rational exercise of the State’s police power, reasonably calculated to achieve its goal of eliminating nepotism in the savings and loan industry (see Memorandum of State Banking Dept, NY Legis Ann, 1971, p 110; see Minnesota v Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 US 456 , reh den 450 US 1027 ; Town of North Hempstead v Exxon Corp., 53 NY2d 747 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Walter Fleisher Co., Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
See 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1734 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John E. Long, Inc. v. Borough of Ringwood
Accordingly, “ ‘federal judicial interference with a state zoning board’s ... decisions ... is proper only if the governmental body could have had no legitimate reason for its decision.’ ” Pace, 808 F.2d at 1035 (quoting Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 482-83 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 3276 , 91 L.Ed.2d 566 (1986), and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 41 (1986)); see also Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456, 464 , 101 S.Ct. 715, 724 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659 , reh’g denied, 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 17…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Recycling & Salvage Corp.
See e.g., Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456 , 101 S.Ct. 715 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 659 , reh'g denied, 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 222 (1981); Borough of Glassboro v. Gloucester County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 100 N.J. at 147 , 495 A. 2d 49 ; Elizabeth v. Department of Envtl.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company, and the American Road Insurance Company and Ford Life Insurance Company, and First Nationwide Financial Corporation and First Nationwide Bank v. Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Appeal of Pennsylvania Association of Independent Insurance Agents, Ulrich, John M., Jr., Professional Insurance Agents Association of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, Inc., Leach, Charles P., Jr., Pennsylvania Association of Life Underwriters and Alexander, Harold E., (Intervening Defendants) in 88-1339. United Services Automobile Association, a Texas Reciprocal Interinsurance Exchange, Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, Usaa Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, and Usaa Annuity and Life Insurance Comapany, a Texas Stock Insurance v. Muir, William J., Iii, Acting Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Appeal of Pennsylvania Association of Independent Insurance Agents, John Ulrich, Jr., Professional Insurance Agents Association of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, Inc. Charles P. Leach, Jr., Pennsylvania Association of Life Underwriters and Harold E. Alexander, in 88-5077. United Services Automobile Association, a Texas Reciprocal Interinsurance Exchange, Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, Usaa Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, and Usaa Annuity and Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance v. Muir, William J., Iii, Acting Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Association of Independent Insurance Agents, John Ulrich, Jr., Professional Insurance Agents Association of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, Inc. Charles P. Leach, Jr., Pennsylvania Association of Life Underwriters and Harold E. Alexander, Intervenors. Appeal of Constance Foster, in 88-5078. United Services Automobile Association, a Texas Reciprocal Interinsurance Exchange, Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, Usaa Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance Company, and Usaa Annuity and Life Insurance Company, a Texas Stock Insurance v. Muir, William J., Iii, Acting Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Association of Independent Insurance Agents, John Ulrich, Jr., Professional Insurance Agents Association of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, Inc. Charles P. Leach, Jr. Pennsylvania Association of Life Underwriters and Harold E. Alexander, Plaintiffs/intervenors. Appeal of United Services Automobile Association, Usaa Casualty Insurance Company, Usaa Life Insurance Company, and Usaa Annuity and Life Insurance Company, in 88-5121
See also, Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery, Co., 449 U.S. 456, 471 , 101 S.Ct. 715, 727 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659 reh. denied, 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). 17 67 As we have previously noted in performing that inquiry, "[t]he 'incidental burden on interstate commerce' appropriately considered in Commerce Clause balancing is the degree to which the state action incidentally discriminates against interstate commerce relative to intrastate commerce.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania
See also, Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery, Co., 449 U.S. 456, 471 , 101 S.Ct. 715, 727 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659 reh. denied, 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). 17 As we have previously noted in performing that inquiry, “[t]he ‘incidental burden on interstate commerce’ appropriately considered in Commerce Clause balancing is the degree to which the state action incidentally discriminates against interstate commerce relative to intrastate commerce.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Kerosene Heater Ass'n v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
See, e.g., Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery, Inc., 449 U.S. 456, 470-75 , 101 S.Ct. 715, 727-29 , 66 L.Ed.2d 659 , reh. denied, 450 U.S. 1027 , 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981) (the court’s analysis of the burden imposed on interstate commerce by a facially neutral state law based on the police power clearly focused on the question of discrimination).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walter Fleisher Co., Inc.
v.
County of Los Angeles
v.
County of Los Angeles
No. 79-700.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1981.
Consideration, Took.
Published
449 U. S. 608. Petition for rehearing denied.
Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.