green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Cabell v. Chavez-Salido
Such power inheres in the State by virtue of its obligation, already noted above, `to preserve the basic conception of a political community.' Dunn v. Blumstein, 450 U. S., at 344.
discussed
Cited "see"
Yaba v. Roosevelt
See Teltronics Services, Inc. v. LM Ericsson Telecommunications Inc., 642 F.2d 31, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 978 , 101 S.Ct. 1511 , 67 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981); see also Sadler, 793 F.Supp. at 90 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Selletti v. Carey
In short, as the Second Circuit recently explained, “a client is ordinarily bound by the acts of his lawyer.” Dodson v. Runyon, 86 F.3d 37, 40 (2d Cir.1996) (citations omitted); see also Teltronics Servs., Inc. v. L M Ericsson Telecomm., Inc., 642 F.2d 31, 36 (2d Cir.1981) (same), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 978 , 101 S.Ct. 1511 , 67 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981); United Overseas Bank v. Marchand, 1996 WL 695902 , at *5-6 (S.D.N.Y.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
University of Texas
v.
Camenisch
v.
Camenisch
No. 80-317.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 9, 1981.
Published
C. Á. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 449 IT. S. 950.1 Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.