green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.7 score
“what is material is not that plaintiffs hands are dirty, but that he dirtied them in acquiring the rights he now asserts, or that the manner of dirtying renders inequitable the assertion of such rights against the defendant”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Manufacturing Research Corp. v. Graybar Electric Co.
But see Tveter v. A B Turn-O-Matic, 633 F.2d 831, 833 (9th Cir. 1980) (failure to cite relevant prior art to Patent Office overturns presumption of validity and shifts burden of proof to patent holder to demonstrate validity), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 300 (1981). .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Juno Online Services, L.P. v. Juno Lighting, Inc.
what is material is not that plaintiffs hands are dirty, but that he dirtied them in acquiring the rights he now asserts, or that the manner of dirtying renders inequitable the assertion of such rights against the defendant
discussed
Cited "see"
Barker-Hatch v. Viejas Group Baron Long Capitan Grande Band of Digueno Mission Indians of Viejas Group Reservation
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 715 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, 249 F.2d 915 , 917 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 960 , 78 S.Ct. 998 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 245, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5143, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,031, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8275 United States of America v. Morreon B. Rude, United States of America v. Stafford Y.L. Mew, United States of America v. Charles E. Andrews, United States of America v. Rodney H.S. Kim
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792, 802 (2d Cir.1980) ("A scheme to defraud is not complete until the proceeds have been received and use of the mail or wires to obtain the proceeds satisfies the jurisdictional element."), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Tonawanda Band Of Seneca Indians
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714-15 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 999 F.2d 503, 507 (11th Cir.1993) (finding federal question jurisdiction lacking where plaintiff asserted jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 but "present[ed] facts establishing a breach of contract claim").
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714-16 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 999 F.2d 503, 507 (11th Cir.1993) (finding federal question jurisdiction lacking where plaintiff asserted jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 but “presented] facts establishing a breach of contract claim”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rude
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792, 802 (2d Cir.1980) (“A scheme to defraud is not complete until the proceeds have been received and use of the mail or wires to obtain the proceeds satisfies the jurisdictional element.”), cer t. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nichols v. United States
(2×)
See Wilson v. Estelle, 625 F. 2d 1158, 1159 , and n. 1 (CA5 1980) (a prior uncounseled misdemeanor conviction cannot be used under a sentence enhancement statute to convert a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony with a prison term), cert. denied, 451 U. S. 912 (1981); United States v. Castro-Vega, 945 F. 2d 496, 500 (CA2 1991) ( Baldasar does not apply where "the court used an uncounseled misdemeanor conviction to determine the appropriate criminal history category for a crime that was already a felony"), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orjuela
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alice Paulette Pagan v. Shoney's, Inc.
(2×)
See Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Burger King Corp. v. Mason, 710 F.2d 1480, 1487 (11th Cir.1983) (reviewing fifth circuit rulings on compromise verdicts), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1599 , 80 L.Ed.2d 130 (1984): see also National R.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Buttrum v. Black
See Wilson v. Estelle, 625 F.2d 1158, 1159 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1985 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981), citing for comparison Baldosar v. Illinois, 446 U.S. 222, 223-24 , 100 S.Ct. 1585, 1585-86 , 64 L.Ed.2d 169 (1980) (plurality opinion) (uncounseled misdemeanor conviction may not be used under an enhanced penalty statute to convert a later misdemeanor into a felony with a prison term); see also United States v. Peagler, 847 F.2d 756, 757-79 (11th Cir.1988); Thompson v. Estelle, 642 F.2d 996, 998 (5th Cir., Unit A, April 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellant v. California State Board of Equalization Richard Nevins, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Equalization Conway H. Collis, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization William M. Bennett, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization, Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellee. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellee v. California State Board of Equalization, and Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellant. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714 (9th Cir.1980) (declining to interpret "arising under" language in section 1362 more broadly than identical language in section 1331), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981). 17 The Supreme Court has explained that an action arises under federal law if that law creates the cause of action, American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co., 241 U.S. 257, 260 , 36 S.Ct. 585, 586 , 60 L.Ed. 987 (1916), or if a substantial question of federal law is a necessary element of plaintiff's caus…
discussed
Cited "see"
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellant v. California State Board of Equalization Richard Nevins, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Equalization Conway H. Collis, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization William M. Bennett, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization, Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellee. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellee v. California State Board of Equalization, and Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellant. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714 (9th Cir.1980) (declining to interpret "arising under" language in section 1362 more broadly than identical language in section 1331), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981). 17 The Supreme Court has explained that an action arises under federal law if that law creates the cause of action, American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co., 241 U.S. 257, 260 , 36 S.Ct. 585, 586 , 60 L.Ed. 987 (1916), or if a substantial question of federal law is a necessary element of plaintiff's caus…
discussed
Cited "see"
Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714 (9th Cir.1980) (declining to interpret “arising under” language in section 1362 more broadly than identical language in section 1331), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714 (9th Cir.1980) (declining to interpret “arising under” language in section 1362 more broadly than identical language in section 1331), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Extradition of Tang Yee-Chun
See Matter of Sindona, 450 F.Supp. 672, 686-92 (S.D.N.Y.), writ of habeas corpus denied sub nom Sindona v. Grant, 461 F.Supp. 199 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd, 619 F.2d 167 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Forma
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792, 805 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Salim
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792, 804 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles H. Kehm, Iii, and Steven M. Greenberg
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792, 804 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981) (by implication).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Davis Farrar and Dale Lawson Farrar v. Clarence D. Cain
(2×)
See Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Eng'rs, 632 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); see also Eximco, Inc. v. Trane Co., 748 F.2d 287, 290 (5th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Margarita Ciro and Fanny Lidia Sloan
See United States v. Calder, 641 F.2d 76, 78-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Solomon Weiss
(2×)
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maxey v. Freightliner Corp.
(2×)
See Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981) (re-trial on issue of damages only); Lowe v. General Motors Corporation, 624 F.2d 1373 , 1384 (5th Cir.1980) (if the plaintiffs failed to accept a remittitur on amount of punitive damages, the district court “may order a new trial solely on the issue of damages”); 1 Davis v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 532 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir.1976) (re-trial limited to damages); Stewart v. Atlantic Pipe Line Co., 479 F.2d 311, 312 (5th Cir.1973) (statement …
cited
Cited "see"
Rocco Messina and Charles J. Arico, A/K/A \Charles J. Pido
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Rivera v. Becerra
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 710 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
5 Employee Benefits Cas. 1917, unempl.ins.rep. (Cch) P 21,716 Michael Rivera, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant-Appellee, and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Donald E. Volck, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Cross- Appellants-Appellees v. Gloria Becerra, Director of California Employment Development Department, and Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of United States Department of Labor, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 710 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Dolmetta v. Uintah National Corp.
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792 (2d Cir.1980) (affirming conviction), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Dolmetta v. Uintah National Corporation
See United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792 (2d Cir.1980) (affirming conviction), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
B. Frank Thomas v. J.D. Cox, Warden
See United States v. Calder, 641 F.2d 76, 78-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. United States
See Mack v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 187 , 635 F.2d 828 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Giordano
See United States v. Calder, 641 F.2d 76 (2d Cir.) (Hobbs Act), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981); United States v. Ricciardi, 357 F.2d 91, 94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 942 , 86 S.Ct. 1464 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ortiz
See United States v. Calder, 641 F.2d 76 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
JAMES COUTEE, et. al., Plaintiffs, JAMES COUTEE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
(2×)
See id., (citing Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Falesbork
In the instant case, the court used an uncounseled misdemeanor conviction to determine the appropriate criminal history category for a crime that was already a felony. 945 F.2d at 500 ; see also Wilson v. Estelle, 625 F.2d 1158 , 1159 n. 1 (5th Cir.Unit A 1980) (Baldosar held only “that a prior un-counseled misdemeanor conviction may not be used under an enhanced penalty statute to convert a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony with a prison term.”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1985 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Merrick Ralph Falesbork, A/K/A Merc, A/K/A Merrick, United States of America v. Clarence Alfred Lindsey, A/K/A Clarence Lindsay, A/K/A Cal, United States of America v. Tyrone Boone, United States of America v. Bobby Louis Turner, A/K/A Robert Louis Turner, A/K/A Bone
In the instant case, the court used an uncounseled misdemeanor conviction to determine the appropriate criminal history category for a crime that was already a felony. 12 945 F.2d at 500 ; see also Wilson v. Estelle, 625 F.2d 1158 , 1159 n. 1 (5th Cir.Unit A 1980) (Baldasar held only "that a prior uncounseled misdemeanor conviction may not be used under an enhanced penalty statute to convert a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony with a prison term."), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1985 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981). 13 Our holding views each of Lindsey's criminal convictions discretely.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Shoshone Business Council v. Babbitt
See, e.g., Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714-15 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Martinez, 519 F.2d 479, 481-82 (10th Cir.1975). 26 Plaintiffs invoke 28 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Shoshone Business Council ex rel. Western Shoshone Tribe of the Duck Valley Reservation v. Babbitt
See, e.g., Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, 626 F.2d 708, 714-15 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Martinez, 519 F.2d 479, 481-82 (10th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diamond Enterprises USA, Inc. v. Steinsvaag
(2×)
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Eng'rs, 632 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diamond D Enterprises USA, Inc. v. Steinsvaag
(2×)
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Eng’rs, 632 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chat Phav v. Trueblood, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas J. McElroy Jr., and Robert H. Stedman
Whether [the bank] suffered any actual loss is of little importance.” Castiglia, 894 F.2d at 537-38 ; see also United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792, 800-01 (2d Cir.1980), (“Sindona"), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence J. Sparks v. Dale Foltz
See also Wilson v. Estelle, 625 F.2d 1158, 1159 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
See, e.g., United States v. Sindona, 636 F.2d 792, 804 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981) (mischaracterizing Meyerhofer as involving client challenge to attorney’s conduct); International Elect.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Francisco C. Pelaes and Enrique Jesus Osorno
See also United States v. Colder, 641 F.2d 76, 78-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mekdeci v. Merrell National Laboratories
(2×)
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mekdeci, David v. Merrell National Laboratories
(2×)
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1246 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burger King Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Gerald A. Mason, Cross-Appellees. Burger King Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Counter- Cross-Appellant v. Gerald A. Mason, Counter-Plaintiffs, Cross
(2×)
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1247 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Davis v. Becker & Associates, Inc., 608 F.2d 621 (5th Cir.1979); Bassett Furniture Industries of North Carolina, Inc. v. NVF Co., 576 F.2d 1084, 1094 (5th Cir.), reh. denied with opinion, 583 F.2d 778 (5th Cir.1978); Parker v. Wideman, 380 F.2d 433, 437 (5th Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burger King Corp. v. Mason
(2×)
See, e.g., Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, 632 F.2d 1242, 1247 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1983 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); Davis v. Becker & Associates, Inc., 608 F.2d 621 (5th Cir.1979); Bassett Furniture Industries of North Carolina, Inc. v. NVF Co., 576 F.2d 1084, 1094 (5th Cir.), reh. denied with opinion, 583 F.2d 778 (5th Cir.1978); Parker v. Wideman, 380 F.2d 433, 437 (5th Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Paul Franklin
See also United States v. Buchanan, 633 F.2d 423, 426 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1984 , 68 L.Ed.2d 301 (1981); United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188, 192 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); United States v. Adcock, 558 F.2d 397, 402 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 921 , 98 S.Ct. 395 , 54 L.Ed.2d 277 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, Inc.
v.
Hadra
v.
Hadra
No. 80-1513.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1981.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.