green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. Robles
For purposes of both state and federal equal protection analysis, “[a] statute which treats males and females differently violates equal protection unless the classification is substantially related to the achievement of an important governmental objective.” (People v Liberta, 64 NY2d 152, 168 [1984], cert denied 471 US 1020 [1985], citing, inter alia, Craig v Boren, 429 US 190, 197 [1976]; see also People v Whidden, 51 NY2d 457, 460 [1980], appeal dismissed 454 US 803 [1981].) The reservation of marriage to opposite-sex couples, however, does not “treat[ ] males and females differently,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Papadopoulos
v.
Oregon State Board of Higher Education
v.
Oregon State Board of Higher Education
No. 81-158.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Ore. dismissed
for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.