green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“if a party could bind a judge by his factual allegations in a section 455 motion ... the result would be a virtual open season for recusal”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bank of San Antonio v. Swift (In Re Swift)
if a party could bind a judge by his factual allegations in a section 455 motion ... the result would be a virtual open season for recusal
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Benavides v. Drug Enforcement Agency
unless there is evidence to the contrary in the record, we believe such promises of confidentiality are inherently implicit in fbi interviews conducted pursuant to a criminal investigation.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lieb v. Tillman (In Re Lieb)
section 455 ... does not require the judge to accept all allegations by a moving party as true.... if a party could bind a judge by his factual allegations in a section 455 motion ... the result would be a virtual open season for recusal
discussed
Cited "see"
Powell v. Tosh
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure Review of State of Miss., 637 F.2d 1014, 1022 (5th Cir. 1981) (noting that joinder impracticable in part because neither party could identify class members), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); Primavera Familienstiftung, 178 F.R.D. at 410 (noting that “[knowledge of names and existence of members ... renders joinder practicable.”); see also Spectrum Fin.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gries v. Standard Ready Mix Concrete, L.L.C.
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure Review of State of Miss., 637 F.2d 1014, 1022 (5th Cir.1981) (noting that joinder impracticable in part because neither party could identify class members), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); Primavera Familienstiftung v. Askin, 178 F.R.D. 405, 410 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (noting that “[kjnowledge of names and existence of members ... renders joinder practicable.”); Moore v. Trippe, 743 F.Supp. 201, 211 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (“[Tjhere appears to be little difficulty in joining all the members of …
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanft v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure Review of State of Miss., 637 F.2d 1014, 1022 (5th Cir.1981) (noting that joindér impracticable in part because neither party could identify class members), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); Primavera Familienstiftung v. Askin, 178 F.R.D. 405, 410 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (noting that “[k]nowledge of names and existence of members ... renders joinder practicable.”); Moore v. Trippe, 743 F.Supp. 201, 211 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (“[T]here appears to be little difficulty in joining all the members of…
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Perrysburg Township v. City of Rossford
See Miller v. Webster (C.A.7, 1981), 661 F.2d 623 , 626, certiorari denied (1982), 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 ; Nix v. United States (C.A.4, 1978), 572 F.2d 998, 1003 ; and Borton, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition v. Taco Bell Corp.
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure Review of State of Miss., 637 F.2d 1014, 1022 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982) (joinder impracticable in part because neither party could identify class members); Arnold v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., 158 F.R.D. 439, 448 (N.D.Cal.1994) (“by the very nature” of the class of people with disabilities affected by defendant’s architectural barriers, members were “unknown” and could not be “readily identified,” making joinder impracticable.).
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance & Expenditure Review, 637 F.2d 1014, 1019-21 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. United States Department of Treasury
See Rodriguez v. Department of the Treasury, 108 F.R.D. 360, 363 (D.D.C.1985) (citing Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee etc., 637 F.2d 1014 , 1022 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); Christman v. American Cyanamid Co., 92 F.R.D. 441, 447 (N.D.W.Va.1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. General Development Corp.
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee, 637 F.2d 1014 , 1024 (5th Cir. 1981) (“we have approved the practice of allowing rejected applicants to represent classes including those deterred from applying”), cer t. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); Christman v. American Cyanamid Co., 92 F.R.D. 441 , 447 n. 12 (N.D.W.Va.1981) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Gypsum Co. v. Kirbyville Independent School District
See Philips [Phillips] v. Joint Legislative Committee, 637 F.2d 1014 , 1022 (5th Cir. 1981), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); Zeidman v. J Ray McDermott & Co., 651 F.2d 1030,1038 (5th Cir.1981). 2 The size of the proposed class, as well as National Gypsum’s actions in this case, points out the impracticability of joinder.
cited
Cited "see"
Frank Briscoe Company, Inc. v. Clark County
See Cann v. Ford Motor Co., 658 F.2d 54, 58 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2036 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur B. Keys, Jr. v. United States Department of Justice
See Miller v. Bell, 661 F.2d 623, 627 (7th Cir.1981) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982); Johnson v. Department of Justice, 739 F.2d 1514, 1517-18 (10th Cir.1984) (reviewing cases and categorizing standards applied).
cited
Cited "see"
Peter Irons and Melvin Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice
See Miller v. Bell, 661 F.2d 623, 625 (7th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company v. Drysdale Securities Corporation
See Cann v. Ford Motor Co., 658 F.2d 54, 58 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2036 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Drysdale Securities Corp.
See Cann v. Ford Motor Co., 658 F.2d 54, 58 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2036 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stacey Lynn Merkt and John B. Elder
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Comm., 637 F.2d 1014 , 1019-20 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Walters
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure Review, 637 F.2d 1014, 1022 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
ca2 1985
See Cann v. Ford Motor Co., 658 F.2d 54, 60 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2036 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Fish v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
See Cann v. Ford Motor Co., 658 F.2d 54, 60 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2036 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Brant Construction Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Miller v. Bell, 661 F.2d 623, 628-32 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Brant Construction Company, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Miller v. Bell, 661 F.2d 623, 628-32 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982). 7 Brant asserts that the district court's conclusion that the Jeffries were not a confidential source is a finding of fact to which this court must defer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Department of Treasury
See Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee etc., 637 F.2d 1014 , 1022 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); Christman v. American Cyanamid Co., 92 F.R.D. 441, 447 (N.D.W.Va.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andre H. v. Ambach
Green v. Johnson, 513 F.Supp. 965, 975 (D.Mass.1981); see Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure Review, 637 F.2d 1014, 1022 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Kluger v. Commissioner
See Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211 (1979), in note 9 supra. The Government petitioned for certiorari in the Supreme Court, and it was granted. 456 U.S. 960 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald Lee Parton v. United States Department of Justice, and William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States
See Miller v. Bell, 661 F.2d 623, 626-27 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Powell v. United States Dept. of Justice
See Miller v. Webster, 483 F.Supp. 883, 895 (N.D.Ill.1979), rev’d in part, 661 F.2d 623 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982) (declining to award multiplier under the facts of that case); Continental Cas.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Access Now, Inc. v. Ambulatory Surgery Center Group, Ltd.
See, e.g., Phillips v. Joint Legislative Comm., 637 F.2d 1014 , 1022 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982) (joinder impracticable in part because neither party could identify class members).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Petrovic v. Amoco Oil Co.
See also Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee, 637 F.2d 1014 , 1023 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 971, 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 2233, 72 L.Ed.2d 483 , 845 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Christopher Petrovic v. Amoco Oil Co.
See also Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee, 637 F.2d 1014 , 1023 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 971 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Culinary Foods, Inc. v. Raychem Corp.
John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146 , 110 S.Ct. 471 , 107 L.Ed.2d 462 (1989); See also Miller v. Bell, 661 F.2d 623 (7th Cir.1981) cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allene Fields and Earine Daniels v. Hallsville Independent School District
While a vacancy need not exist on the precise day of application, an application will'only be “treated as viable for a reasonable period of time.” McLean v. Phillips-Ramsey, Inc., 624 F.2d 70, 72 (9th Cir.1980) (written application one month before vacancy sufficient where applicant had mailed follow-up letter); see also Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure Review, 637 F.2d 1014, 1030 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982) (although exact date vacancy occurred was unclear, district court erred in requiring that …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fasanaro v. Mooney Aircraft Corp.
See, e.g., Cann v. Ford Motor Co., 658 F.2d 54, 59-60 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2036 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982); Josephs v. Harris Corp., 677 F.2d 985, 991 (3d Cir.1982); Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 857 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Grenada Steel Industries v. Alabama Oxygen Co., 695 F.2d 883, 886-87 (5th Cir.1983); Hall v. American Steamship Co., 688 F.2d 1062, 1066-67 (6th Cir.1982); Flaminio v. Honda Motor Co., 733 F.2d 463, 469 (7th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arrango v. Ward
See, e.g., Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee, 637 F.2d 1014 , 1021-22 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Powell v. United States Dept. of Justice
See, e.g., Miller v. Bell, 661 F.2d 623, 631 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982) (weighing public harm to the integrity of future FBI undercover investigations in upholding deletion of FBI agents’ names under 7C and considering potential harm to public confidence in integrity of FBI criminal investigations caused by disclosure of names of third parties named by interviewees in upholding 7C claims); Lamont, 475 F.Supp. at 782 (weighing under Exemption 6 potential harm to FBI’s investigative functions if names of interviewees were disclosed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Huddleston v. Duckworth
See also, Phillips v. Joint Legislative Committee on Performance and Expenditure Review of the State of Miss., 637 F.2d 1014 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 2035 , 72 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982) (potential conflict of interest between attorney acting as class representative and said attorney’s law firm acting as counsel in class action to be carefully scrutinized and guarded against); Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., 561 F.2d 86 (7th Cir.1977), appeal after remand, 587 F.2d 866 (1978), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 942 , 100 S.Ct. 1336 , 63 L.Ed.2d 775 (1980) (fact that class represe…
Container Corporation of America
v.
Franchise Tax Board
v.
Franchise Tax Board
No. 81-523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1982.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: W.D. Texas (2) · District of Columbia (1)
Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Probable jurisdiction noted.