green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2008 ·
…an action brought pursuant to 42 u.s.c. 1983 cannot lie against federal officers.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
Roper v. United States
(4×)
But see United States v. Riley, 684 F.2d 542 (8th Cir.1982) (rejecting this analysis), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Holmes v. Department of Navy
(2×)
an action brought pursuant to 42 u.s.c. 1983 cannot lie against federal officers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Franqui v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles G. Stephens, Sr.
See United States v. Williams, 621 F.2d 123, 125-26 (5th Cir.1980) (payor testified that, if defendant had not been a school board member, he would not have given defendant $4,000), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 1366 , 67 L.Ed.2d 346 (1981), appeal after remand, 679 F.2d 504 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 963 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kingsley v. Bureau of Prisons
(2×)
See Chodos v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 559 F.Supp. 69, 72 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); see also Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 456 F.2d 1339, 1346 (2d Cir.1972) (on remand). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kingsley v. Bureau of Prisons
(2×)
See Chodos v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 559 F.Supp. 69, 72 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); see also Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 456 F.2d 1339, 1346 (2d Cir.1972) (on remand) 5 We note that challenges to the length, appropriateness or conditions of confinement are properly brought under 28 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Scally
See United States v. Riley, 657 F2d 1377, 1386 (8th Cir 1981), cert den 459 US 1111 (1983); United States v. Marshall, 532 F2d 1279, 1285 (9th Cir 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rose
(2×)
See United States v. Shigemura, 682 F.2d 699, 703 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); State v. Glass, 554 S.W.2d 426, 429-30 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Parhm, 546 S.W.2d 17, 19-20 (Mo.App.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shirley Maggitt and Tommy Maggitt
See generally United States v. Williams, 679 F.2d 504, 508 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 963 (1983) (an indictment need not set forth facts and evidentiary details necessary to establish each of the elements of the charged offense).
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington v. James
(2×)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); see Chodos v. F.B.I., 559 F.Supp. 69 , 70 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983) (motion to dismiss not a "responsive pleading" for Rule 15 purposes). 15 Although stated in less than artful words, the pro se complaint as amended can reasonably be read to allege that state prison officials intentionally violated Washington's right of reasonable access to the courts, see Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. at 821 , 97 S.Ct. at 1494 , and his right to receive and send legal mail, see Heimerle v. Attorney Ge…
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington v. James
(2×)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); see Chodos v. F.B.I., 559 F.Supp. 69 , 70 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 697 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983) (motion to dismiss not a “responsive pleading” for Rule 15 purposes).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geoffrey William Briley
See United States v. *1304 Shigemura, 682 F.2d 699, 706 (8th Cir.1982), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); United States v. Ruiz-Altschiller, 694 F.2d 1104,1106-07 (8th Cir.1982), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 3117 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1371 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen C. Mansaw, United States of America v. Bryan R. Mansaw, United States of America v. Darrel Lester Clay, United States of America v. Pamela Holliman
See United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1384 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); United States v. Love, 592 F.2d 1022, 1025-26 (8th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Bongarzone
See United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1383 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 (1983); United States v. Palumbo, 639 F.2d 123,130-134 (3d Cir. 1981) (Adams, J., concurring), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 819 (1981); United States v. Alvarez, 584 F.2d 694, 700-701 (5th Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mansaw
See United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1384 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); United States v. Love, 592 F.2d 1022, 1025-26 (8th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES G. STEPHENS, SR
See United States v. Williams, 621 F.2d 123, 125-26 (5th Cir. 1980) (payor testified that, if defendant had not been a school board member, he would not have given defendant $4,000), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 919 , 101 S. Ct. 1366 (1981), appeal after remand, 679 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S. Ct. 742 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Alvarez, 584 F.2d 694, 701 (5 th Cir.1978) (construing Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(3) on inculpatory statements as to the accused as requiring the same "corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement” as when such statements are offered to exculpate the accused as the last sentence of Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(3) explicitly requires, thereby “avoiding constitutional difficulties." Accord United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1383 (8th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983) (citing Alvarez, supra, 584 F.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Yarbough
(2×)
Hoffman, 957 F.2d at 299 ; United States v. Manganellis, 864 F.2d 528, 543 (7th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Shigemura, 682 F.2d 699, 702-03 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 741 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ors, Inc.
See also United States v. Williams, 679 F.2d 504, 509 (5th Cir.1979) (extending to Hobbs Act cases the Diecidue holding that the interstate commerce element could be alleged in conclusory terms under RICO), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 963 (1983); United States v. Boston, 718 F.2d 1511, 1515 (11th Cir.1983) (“We are persuaded that it is not necessary for the indictment in a Hobbs Act case to allege the exact nature of the interference with commerce.”), cer t. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Markum Lynn Fitzhugh
See United States v. Fiallo-Jacome, 874 F.2d 1479 (11th Cir.1989); Brooks v. United States, 757 F.2d 734 (5th Cir.1985) (party precluded from raising issue for first time in subsequent appeal where issue did not arise from proceedings following remand after initial appeal); compare United States v. Williams, 679 F.2d 504 (5th Cir.1982) (court had authority in second direct appeal to hear claims of criminal defendant not presented in government’s earlier appeal from grant of motion for judgment of acquittal), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 963 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 679 F.2d 504 (5th Cir.1982), cert. den. 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 963 [Rule 7(c) does not require that the indictment set forth facts and evidentiary details necessary to establish each of the elements of the charged offense]; United States v. Carr, 582 F.2d 242 (2nd Cir.1978) [the government is not required to set forth evidentia-ry matter in an indictment].
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
(4×)
See McGee, 95 N.M. at 320 , 621 P.2d at 1133 ; see also United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1384 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Paquette
See, e.g., United States v. Riley, 657 F.2d 1377, 1386 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 (1983) (prior statement admissible based on the victim’s lack of present memory together with her having read the statement and signed it).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bernier
(2×)
Compare United States v. Riley, 684 F.2d 542, 546 (8th Cir.1982) (allowing use of evidence), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 742 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); Oliphant v. Koehler, 594 F.2d 547, 555 (6th Cir.1979) (same), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 877 , 100 S.Ct. 162 , 62 L.Ed.2d 105 (1979); and United States v. Castro-Castro, 464 F.2d 336, 337 (9th Cir.1972) (same), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 916 , 93 S.Ct. 971 , 35 L.Ed.2d 278 (1973) with United States v. Mespoulede, 597 F.2d 329, 334-36 (2d Cir.1979) (barring use of evidence) and Wingate v. Wainwright, 464 F.2d 209, 212-14 (5th Cir.1972) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Won Cho
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 683 F.2d 1236, 1240 (9th Cir.1982) (we should resolve any doubt “in favor of maximizing the sentencing options available to district judges”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1111 , 103 S.Ct. 740 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); United States v. Weislow, 485 F.2d 560, 562 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 1447 , 39 L.Ed.2d 491 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Won Cho, United States of America v. Edward L. Harris, Jr., United States of America v. Patrick Anthony Riggans, United States of America v. Murray Evans Laybhen
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 683 F.2d 1236, 1240 (9th Cir.1982) (we should resolve any doubt "in favor of maximizing the sentencing options available to district judges"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 103 S.Ct. 740 , 74 L.Ed.2d 962 (1983); United States v. Weislow, 485 F.2d 560, 562 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 1447 , 39 L.Ed.2d 491 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jordan
v.
Hammock, Chairman, New York State Board of Parole
v.
Hammock, Chairman, New York State Board of Parole
No. 82-5442.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.