green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gregory Smith v. Henry E. Cowan, Sy Hopson, and Nancy Wright
Murphy, 455 U.S. at 482 , 103 S.Ct. at 1184.
cited
Cited "see"
Francisco J. Espinal v. United States
See United States v. Gilboe, 684 F.2d 235, 238 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Alabama v. White, supra. While reasonable suspicion is on a lower rung of certitude than probable cause, Tillman v. State, 275 Ark. 275 , 630 S.W.2d 5 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 (1983), a threshold still must be crossed to justify an investigatory stop and search.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bradley Carl Brown
(2×)
See United States v. Leichtling, 684 F.2d 553, 557 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983); Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Josten
(2×)
See United States v. Horton, 676 F.2d 1165, 1169 (7th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Jon Martin, United States of America v. John David Emerson
(2×)
In determining whether probable cause has been demonstrated, courts are instructed “to interpret affidavits in a nontechnical, common-sense fashion_” Arenal, 768 F.2d at 266 ; accord United States v. Leichtling, 684 F.2d 553, 555 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23
(2×)
See International Assn. of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Lubbers, 681 F. 2d 598, 604 (CA9 1982), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1201 (1983); George Banta Co. v. NLRB, 626 F. 2d 354, 356-357 (CA4 1980), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1080 (1981); Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. NLRB, 339 F. 2d 795, 799 (CA2 1964); cf. Cuyahoga Valley R.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Randolph Williams
See Tillman v. State, 275 Ark. 275 , 630 S.W.2d 5 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1185 , 75 L.Ed.2d 432 (1983) (garment bag partially open, revealing stolen goods); State v. Schrier, 283 N.W.2d 338 (Iowa 1979) (clear plastic bag protruding from knapsack); Commonwealth v. Irwin, 391 Mass. 765 , 463 N.E.2d 1178 (1984); see also 2 W.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest Lopez, United States of America v. John Vlahovich, United States of America v. Paula Nadir
See United States v. Horton, 676 F.2d 1165, 1171-72 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1164 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983); United States v. Mase, 556 F.2d 671, 674 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 916 , 98 S.Ct. 1472 , 55 L.Ed.2d 508 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Linquist v. Bowen
See Frock v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 685 F.2d 1041, 1043-44 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1185 , 75 L.Ed.2d 432 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. Lonardo
(2×)
See United States v. Todisio, 667 F.2d 255, 260 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 1250 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982), and United States v. Horton, 676 F.2d 1165, 1170 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983); see also Committee on the Administration of the Criminal Law of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Guidelines to the Administration of the Speedy Trial Act oif 1979 (1981) at 14 (30-day period does not run anew when a superseding indictment is filed).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Justo Guzman
(2×)
See United States v. Horton, 676 F.2d 1165, 1169-70 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Trapilo
See United States v. Porcelli 865 F.2d 1352, 1358 (2d Cir.) (scheme involved defrauding New York state of state sales taxes), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 810 , 110 S.Ct. 53 , 107 L.Ed.2d 22 (1989); Helmsley, 941 F.2d at 94 (scheme involved intent to defraud New York state of income taxes); see also United States v. Gilboe, 684 F.2d 235, 237-38 (2d Cir.1982) (scheme involved defrauding Chinese government, where the telecommunication systems of the United States were used in transferring certain Chinese payments from a New York bank to a Bahamas bank), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1185 , 7…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Trapilo
See United States v. Porcelli, 865 F.2d 1352, 1358 (2d Cir.) (scheme involved defrauding New York state of state sales taxes), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 810 , 110 S.Ct. 53 , 107 L.Ed.2d 22 (1989); Helmsley, 941 F.2d at 94 (scheme involved intent to defraud New York state of income taxes); see also United States v. Gilboe, 684 F.2d 235, 237-38 (2d Cir.1982) (scheme involved defrauding Chinese government, where the telecommunication systems of the United States were used in transferring certain Chinese payments from a New York bank to a Bahamas bank), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1185 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. US, BUR. OF INDIAN AFF.
Rockbridge v. Lincoln, 449 F.2d 567, 570-71 (9th Cir.1971); see also Ashcroft v. United States Dept. of Interior, 679 F.2d 196 , 198 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1185 , 75 L.Ed.2d 432 (1983); Central Machinery Co. v. Arizona Tax Comm’n, 448 U.S. 160, 165 , 100 S.Ct. 2592, 2596 , 65 L.Ed.2d 684 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert A. Hawley, United States of America v. Audrey J. Hawley
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Leichtling, 684 F.2d 553, 557 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1201 , 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1983) (even if police improperly seized the evidence in question, the nature of the evidence was cumulative at best and its admission constituted harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt); United States v. Jackson, 576 F.2d 749, 753-54 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 175 , 58 L.Ed.2d 167 (1978) (erroneous admission of improperly seized evidence was harmless error where properly admitted evidence was overwhelming).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herman Mers, Lester Mers, Randy James Myers, Paul J. Ferrante
See also United States v. Horton, 676 F.2d 1165, 1173 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1184 , 75 L.Ed.2d 431 (1982) (Swygert, J., dissenting) (section 3161(c)(2) “recognizes that an accused generally needs thirty days to prepare his defense based on the charges detailed in his indictment”); United States v. Wooten, 688 F.2d 941, 951 (4th Cir.1982) (“what section 3161(c)(2) does is simply to guarantee to the criminal defendant the right to a delay of at least thirty days between arraignment and trial in any circumstances”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wracsaricht
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-612.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1983.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.