green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Sessoms v. Maryland
(2×)
See People v. Flowers, 644 P.2d 916 (Colo.), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982); State v. Garfole, 76 N.J. 445 , 388 A.2d 587 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Linegar v. Armour of America, Inc.
See Racer v. Utterman, 629 S.W.2d 387, 394 (Mo.Ct.App.1981) (“Unless a court can say as a matter of law that the product is not unreasonably dangerous the question is one for the jury.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 26 , 74 L.Ed.2d 42 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Linegar v. Armour Of America
See Racer v. Utterman, 629 S.W.2d 387, 394 (Mo.Ct.App.1981) ("Unless a court can say as a matter of law that the product is not unreasonably dangerous the question is one for the jury."), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 26 , 74 L.Ed.2d 42 (1982). 16 The Missouri cases leave the meaning of the phrase "unreasonably dangerous" largely a matter of common sense, the court's or the jury's.
discussed
Cited "see"
Savino v. State
See People v. Flowers, 644 P.2d 916 (Colo.), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982); Commonwealth v. Jewett, 392 Mass. 558 , 467 N.E.2d 155 (1984); Commonwealth v. Murphy, 282 Mass. 593 , 185 N.E. 486 (1933); State v. Bock, 229 Minn. 449 , 39 N.W.2d 887 (1949).
examined
Cited "see"
Lippard v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Racer v. Utterman, 629 S.W.2d 387, 395 (Mo.App.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 26 , 74 L.Ed.2d 42 (1982). 6 See also Austin v. Raybestos —Manhattan, Inc., 471 A.2d 280, 285 (Me.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.
(2×)
See Racer v. Utterman, 629 S.W.2d 387 (Mo.App.1981), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, Racer v. Johnson and Johnson, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 26 , 74 L.Ed.2d 42 (1982); Brawner v. Liberty Industries, Inc., 573 S.W.2d 376 (Mo.App.1978); Cryts v. Ford Motor Company, 571 S.W.2d 683 (Mo.App.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garner v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See abo People v. Mowers, 644 P.2d 916, 918-20 (Colo.1982), appeal dbmbsed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cohn v. Wilkes General Hospital
See e.g., News & Observer Publishing Co. v. Wake County Hospital System, 55 N.C.App. 1 , 284 S.E.2d 542 (1981), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 302 , 291 S.E.2d 151 , app. dis. and cert. denied, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 26 , 74 L.Ed.2d 42 (1982); and Whisenhunt v. Zammit, 86 N.C.App. 425 , 358 S.E.2d 114 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Oberlander
See, e.g., People v. Flowers, 644 P.2d 916, 919 (Colo.), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 803 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
v.
Washington Department of Revenue
v.
Washington Department of Revenue
No. 82-135.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Wash, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.