green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State of Illinois v. David Ferriero
Nat’l Org. for Women v. Idaho, 459 U.S. at 809.
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. The People of the State of California
See, e.g., Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 434 , 111 S.Ct. 2382 , 115 20 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) (“[A] seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an 21 individual and asks a few questions.”); accord Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497 , 103 S.Ct. 22 1319 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) (“[L]aw enforcement officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment 23 by merely approaching an individual on the street or in another public place, by asking him if he 24 is willing to answer some questions, [or] by putting questions to him if the person is willing to 25 listen....”). 26 “A c…
cited
Cited "see"
Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment
See Nat’l Org. for Women, Inc. v. Idaho, 459 U.S. 809 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment
See Nat’l Org. for Women, Inc. v. Idaho, 459 U.S. 809 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cash v. Conn Appliances, Inc.
See generally Wilkins v. University of Houston, 654 F.2d 388, 410 (5th Cir. Unit A Aug.1981) (“the day is long past ... when we proceed with any confidence toward broad conclusions from crude and incomplete statistics”), vacated on other grounds, 459 U.S. 809 , 103 S.Ct. 34 , 74 L.Ed.2d 47 (1982). 53 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Monroe-Lord v. Hytche
See Wilkins v. Univ. of Houston, 654 F.2d 388, 400-401 (5th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, 459 U.S. 809 , 103 S.Ct. 34 , 74 L.Ed.2d 47 (1982), aff'd in pertinent part after remand, 695 F.2d 134 (5th Cir.1983); Mich. State Univ.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brenda S. Griffin and Margaret Waimon v. Board of Regents of Regency Universities, a Public Corporation
(2×)
See Wilkins v. University of Houston, 654 F.2d 388, 397 (5th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, 459 U.S. 809 , 103 S.Ct. 34 , 74 L.Ed.2d 47 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rossini v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc.
See Wilkins v. University of Houston, 654 F.2d 388 (5th Cir.1981), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 459 U.S. 809 , 103 S.Ct. 34 , 74 L.Ed.2d 47 (1982) (violation of Title VII suggested by university’s pay structure in which females comprised 18 of the 21 individuals being paid less than lowest salary level for a particular job title); Melani v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, 561 F.Supp. 769, 776 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (gross statistical disparities in the treatment of similarly qualified men and women may constitute prima facie proof of intentional sex discrimination).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lowe v. Keisling
See also National Organization for Women v. Idaho, 459 U.S. 809 (1982) (vacating decision striking down as unconstitutional a congressional joint resolution extending time to ratify the proposed Equal Rights Amendment, after the extension had passed without the requisite number of state ratifications, and directing dismissal of complaint as moot).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See, e.g., Wilkins v. University of Houston, 654 F.2d 388, 402 (5th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, 459 U.S. 809 , 103 S.Ct. 34 , 74 L.Ed.2d 47 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Organization for Women, Inc.
v.
Idaho National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho
v.
Idaho National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho
No. 81-1282; No. 81-1283; No. 81-1312; No. 81-1313.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Appeal from D. C. Idaho. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 455 U. S. 918];
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari before judgment granted, 455 U. S. 918];
Appeal from D. C. Idaho. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 455 U. S. 918]; and
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari before judgment granted, 455 U. S. 918.] Upon consideration of the memorandum for the Administrator of General Services suggesting mootness, filed July 9, 1982, and the responses thereto, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Idaho is vacated and the cases are remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the complaints as moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).