Clancy v. Jartech, Inc., 459 U.S. 826 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Clancy v. Jartech, Inc., 459 U.S. 826 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · "[T]he § 1983 civil rights action is a personal suit. It does not accrue to a relative, even the father of the deceased."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[T]he § 1983 civil rights action is a personal suit. It does not accrue to a relative, even the father, of the deceased.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The [FDIC] is a federal agency____”
497 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 87 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Estate of Conner ex rel. Conner v. Ambrose (innd, 1997-12-23) · Strongest negative: Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas (nysd, 1993-09-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Roy Export Co. Establishment v. Columbia Broadcast Sys., Inc., 503 F.Supp. 1137, 1149-50 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd 672 F.2d 1095 , 1101, n. 12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982) (artistic control'of the creators was one factor to be considered in deciding whether a work had been commissioned).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Estate of Conner ex rel. Conner v. Ambrose
N.D. Ind. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he 1983 civil rights action is a personal suit. it does not accrue to a relative, even the father, of the deceased.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) ESTATE OF CONNER BY CONNER v. Ambrose
N.D. Ind. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he 1983 civil rights action is a personal suit. it does not accrue to a relative, even the father of the deceased.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Davis v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the is a federal agency____
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Professional Hockey Club Central Sports Club of Army v. Detroit Red Wings, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
hale, chase , and montana all show that 'strangers' are non-parties who are not bound to previous litigation by collateral estoppel
discussed Cited "see" St. Albans Cooperative Creamery, Inc. v. Glickman (2×)
D. Vt. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suntex Dairy v. Block, 666 F.2d 158, 162 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 59 , 74 L.Ed.2d 62 (1982); Lewes Dairy, Inc. v. Freeman, 401 F.2d 308, 315 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied sub nom.
cited Cited "see" Rebecca Judge v. City of Lowell
1st Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dohaish v. Tooley, 670 F.2d 934, 936 (10th Cir.) (Section 1983 action "is a personal suit”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Bush v. Watson
Haw. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Munoz v. County of Imperial, 667 F.2d 811, 816 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 58 , 74 L.Ed.2d 62 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Motorcity Of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865-66 (11th Cir.) (explaining the mechanics of a purchase and assumption transaction), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982) 7 Courts that expanded the D'Oench doctrine often applied the common law and § 1823(e)(1) in tandem, reasoning that "the purposes of D'Oench and section 1823(e) were the same, and therefore ... the same analysis [applied] regardless of whether the party involved in the case was the FDIC or another federal banking regulator." Baumann, 934 F.2d at 1515 .
discussed Cited "see" Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865-66 (11th Cir.) (explaining the mechanics of a purchase and assumption transaction), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982). .
discussed Cited "see" Chezem v. Beverly Enterprises-Texas, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See County of Imperial v. Munoz, 449 U.S. 54 , 101 S.Ct. 289 , 66 L.Ed.2d 258 (1980), appeal after remand, Munoz v. County of Imperial, 667 F.2d 811 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 58 , 74 L.Ed.2d 62 (1982); Pelfresne v. Village of Williams Bay, 917 F.2d 1017, 1020 (7th Cir.1990) ("Only a party, or, ... one who is in privity with a party, is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act."). 4 .
cited Cited "see" Jim Henson Productions, Inc. v. John T. Brady & Associates, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roy Export Co. Estab. of Vaduz v. Columbia Broadcasting, 672 F.2d 1095, 1101 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" First City, Texas-Beaumont, N.A. v. Treece
E.D. Tex. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982). 8 In essence, the doctrine provides the FDIC with “a complete defense to state and common law fraud claims on a note acquired by the FDIC in the execution of a purchase and assumption transaction_” Gunter, 674 F.2d at 873 .
cited Cited "see" W.H. Nimon, Bonnie K. Nimon, and W.H. Nimon, Trustee for Bonnie K. Nimon v. Resolution Trust Corporation
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Nimon v. Resolution Trust Corp.
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Woodstone Ltd. Partnership (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); FDIC v. Wood, 758 F.2d 156 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied 474 U.S. 944 , 106 S.Ct. 308 , 88 L.Ed.2d 286 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" Sani-Dairy v. Yeutter (2×)
W.D. Pa. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suntex Dairy v. Bergland, 591 F.2d 1063, 1065-1067 (5th Cir.1979), rehearing denied, 670 F.2d 181 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 59 , 74 L.Ed.2d 62 (1982); Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. Butz, 504 F.2d 80, 82 (2nd Cir.1974); Lehigh Valley Farmers v. Block, 640 F.Supp. 1497 (E.D.Pa.1986), aff'd on other grounds, 829 F.2d 409 (3d Cir.1987); Jones v. Bergland, 456 F.Supp. 635 (M.D.Pa.1978).
discussed Cited "see" Zions First Nat. Bank, N.A. v. Bailey
1st Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 874-76 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 (1982). 6 15 One of the Investors, the Stewart Family Trust, argues summary judgment was improperly granted against it since its debt is made unenforceable by Utah Code Ann. § 70A-8-319 because the signature on the investment contract of the trustee, Dr. Paul A. Stewart, was forged. 7 Counsel argues the district court erred in holding Dr. Stewart had ratified the documents by making payments to the partnership.
discussed Cited "see" Official Publications, Inc. v. Kable News Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roy Export Co. v. CBS, Inc., 672 F.2d 1095 , 1106 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); Borkowski v. Borkowski, 39 N.Y.2d 982, 983 , 387 N.Y.S.2d 233, 233 , 355 N.E.2d 287, 287 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Key Publications, Inc. v. Chinatown Today Publishing Enterprises, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roy Export Co. Establishment of Vaduz, Liechtenstein v. Columbia Broadcasting Sys., Inc., 672 F.2d 1095, 1103 (2d Cir.) (protection is available for "skill and creativity in selecting and assembling an original arrangement ... even if no new material is added"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); Dow Jones & Co. v. Board of Trade, 546 F.Supp. 113, 116 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (selection, as evidenced by determination of which stocks to include in a compilation, is protectable expression). 15 Galore and Ma, however, note the evidence that some of the listings included i…
discussed Cited "see" Key Publications, Inc. v. Chinatown Today Publishing Enterprises, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roy Export Co. Establishment of Vaduz, Liechtenstein v. Columbia Broadcasting Sys., Inc., 672 F.2d 1095, 1103 (2d Cir.) (protection is available for “skill and creativity in selecting and assembling an original arrangement ... even if no new material is added”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); Dow Jones & Co. v. Board of Trade, 546 F.Supp. 113, 116 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (selection, as evidenced by determination of which stocks to include in a compilation, is protectable expression).
cited Cited "see" Tuxedo Beach Club Corp. v. City Federal Savings Bank
D.N.J. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865-66 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Kramer v. Newman
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
Letter Edged in Black Press, Inc. v. Public Building Comm’n, 320 F.Supp. 1303, 1308 (N.D.Ill.1970); see Roy Export Co. Establishment v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 672 F.2d 1095, 1100-01 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Timberland Design Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
D. Mass. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 , 872 n. 14 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982) (.D’Oench doctrine requires an “element of fault on the part of the obligor”).
cited Cited "see" I. David Porras, A/K/A David C. Porras, and William H. Edmiston, Intervening v. Petroplex Savings Association, Olney Savings Association
5th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Mery v. Universal Savings Ass'n
S.D. Tex. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 873 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 , reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1059 , 103 S.Ct. 477 , 74 L.Ed.2d 624 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Thistlethwaite v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Pernie Bailey Drilling Co.)
Bankr. W.D. La. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Zandstra
N.D. Cal. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance v. Newhart
8th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982), and FDIC v. Wood, 758 F.2d at 160-61 , for discussions of the advantages of purchase and assumption transactions.
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. John W. Newhart
8th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982), and FDIC v. Wood, 758 F.2d at 160-61 , for discussions of the advantages of purchase and assumption transactions.
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland
M.D. Fla. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982) (explaining purchase and assumption process). 1 Included among those assets are the loans underlying plaintiff’s damage claims in this action.
discussed Cited "see" Sibarium v. NCNB Texas National Bank (2×)
N.D. Tex. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunther v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 870 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Business Trends Analysts, Inc. v. The Freedonia Group, Inc. And the Freedonia Group, Incorporated
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roy Export Co. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 503 F.Supp. 1137, 1156-57 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 672 F.2d 1095 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982) (benefit to infringer from unspon-sored infringing broadcast not profit under Section 504(b) because it consists of unmeasurable good will with affiliates and increased prestige in industry).
discussed Cited "see" Osherow v. First RepublicBank San Antonio, N.A. (In Re Linen Warehouse, Inc.)
Bankr. W.D. Tex. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982), which describes the FDIC’s handling of a typical purchase and assumption scheme for a failed bank as follows: [A] purchase and assumption must be consummated with great speed, usually overnight, in order to preserve the going concern value of the failed bank and avoid an interruption in banking services. 4 .
cited Cited "see" First State Bank of Wayne County, Kentucky (Formerly City and County Bank of Wayne County) v. The City and County Bank of Knox County, Tennessee
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865-66 (11th Cir.) (description of purchase and assumption transactions), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Grupo Girod Corporation, Appeal of Enrique N. Vela-Colon
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 873-74 (11th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); F.D.I.C. v. de Jesus Velez, 678 F.2d 371, 374 (1st Cir.). 16 .
discussed Cited "see" Soto Gomez v. Lopez Feliciano
D.P.R. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dohaish v. Tooley, 670 F.2d 934 (10th Cir.) (right to bring action under civil rights act is personal in nature and does not accrue to a relative), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); English v. Powell, 592 F.2d 727 (4th Cir.1979) (wife had no standing to maintain action arising from husband’s demotion on job); Shaw v. Garrison, 545 F.2d 980 , 983 n. 4 (5th Cir.1977), rev’d on other grounds sub nom.; Robertson v. Wegman, 436 U.S. 584 , 98 S.Ct. 1991 , 56 L.Ed.2d 554 (1978); Topic v. Circle Realty Co., 532 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir.) (litigants have no standing to…
cited Cited "see" Evans v. Robbins (In Re Robbins)
Bankr. W.D. Mo. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865-66 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Turner v. Officers of the Mid Valley Bank
E.D. Wash. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.) cert denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); Telegraph v. Schilling, 807 F.2d 590 (7th Cir.), cert denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 73 , 98 L.Ed.2d 37 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. Verity (2×)
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suntex Dairy v. Block, 666 F.2d 158, 162 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 59 , 74 L.Ed.2d 62 (1982); cf. Chrysler Corp. v. EPA, 631 F.2d 865, 890 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021 , 101 S.Ct. 589 , 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980) (applying substantial evidence test). .
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Manatt
E.D. Ark. · 1988 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 872 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); FDIC v. Leach, 525 F.Supp. 1379, 1384 (E.D.Mich.1981) (FDIC granted a status superior to that of a holder in due course).
discussed Cited "see" Lehigh Valley Farmers v. Block (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suntex Dairy v. Block, 666 F.2d 158, 162 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 59 , 74 L.Ed.2d 62 (1982); Lewes Dairy, Inc. v. Freeman, 401 F.2d 308, 315 (3d Cir.1968), cert, denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" Lehigh Valley Farmers, Atlantic Processing, Inc., Dairylea Cooperative, Inc., Mount Joy Farmers Cooperative, Monroe County Milk Producers Cooperative, Ruth, Alpheus Gehman, Robert Hetrick, Roy Hartung, Richard Hafer, Earl R., on Behalf of Himself and the Members of the Berks County Dairy Farmers Protective Association, and Hollenbach, Carl and Carolyn on Behalf of Themselves and the Members of Berks County Dairy Farmers Protective Association v. Block, John R. Pennmarva Dairymen's Cooperative Federation, Inc. & the Individual Members Thereof (Intervenors), Eastern Milk Producers Cooperative Assoc. Inc. & Group of Private Independently Owned Proprietary Handlers (Intervenors). Appeal of John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture. Farmers' Cooperative Dairy Inc. Spiece, Guy E. Cook, Donald L. Drasher, A. Charles Hilliard, Foster E., Jr. Mylet, Andrew M. Travelpiece, Luther R. And Yoder, Samuel A., on Behalf of Themselves and All Members of Farmers' Cooperative Dairy, Inc. Leatherman, John Rhein, Dawn F. Heisler Bros. Leatherman, Bruce Martin, Ronald Hollenbach, Carl Brown, Carl Hefner, Ralph T/a Jersey Acres Farms Kurtz, Harry Wolf, Marvin Moyer, Wilbert Daubert, William R. Petravich, Alvin Moyer, Lester Leiby, Bertram Heisler, Carl Heisler, Paul Schnoke, Samuel Huber, Robert Moyer, Amos, Jr. Kreager, Kenneth Cuers Dairy, Inc. And Valley Farms, Inc. v. Block, John R. Pennmarva Dairymen's Cooperative Federation, Inc. (Intervenor), Eastern Milk Producers Cooperative Assoc. Inc. & Group of Private Independently Owned Proprietary Handlers (Intervenors). Appeal of John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture. Lehigh Valley Farmers, Atlantic Processing, Inc., Dairylea Cooperative, Inc., Mount Joy Farmers Cooperative, Monroe County Milk Producers Cooperative, Ruth, Alpheus Gehman, Robert Hetrick, Roy Hartung, Richard Hafer, Earl R., on Behalf of Himself and the Members of the Berks County Dairy Farmers Protective Association, and Hollenbach, Carl and Carolyn, on Behalf of Themselves and the Members of Berks County Dairy Farmers Protective Association v. Block, John R. Pennmarva Dairymen's Cooperative Federation, Inc. & the Individual Members Thereof (Intervenors), Eastern Milk Producers Cooperative Assoc. Inc. & Group of Private Independently Owned Proprietary Handlers (Intervenors). Appeal of Stocker Brothers Dairy, Proposed Intervenor (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Suntex Dairy v. Block, 666 F.2d 158, 162 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 59 , 74 L.Ed.2d 62 (1982); Lewes Dairy, Inc. v. Freeman, 401 F.2d 308, 315 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied sub nom.
cited Cited "see" Baxter v. McA, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roy Export Co. Establishment v. CBS, 503 F.Supp. 1137, 1145 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 672 F.2d 1095 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Baxter v. MCA, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Roy Export Co. Establishment v. CBS, 503 F.Supp. 1137, 1145 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 672 F.2d 1095 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Howard
Bankr. W.D. Tex. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982) (for a comprehensive discussion of the distinctive roles of the FDIC as receiver and as corporate insurer) [hereinafter cited as Gunter ].
cited Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. La Rambla Shopping Center, Inc.
1st Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865-66 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); Bransilver, Failing Banks: FDIC’s Options and Constraints, 27 Ad.L.
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. John T. Whitlock v. Surety Insurance Company of California
5th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982) (explaining "purchase and assumption” transaction involving failed banks and creating special federal common law protections for FDIC when acquiring note through this method).
cited Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bernard E. Armstrong
6th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862, 865-66 (11th Cir.) (description of purchase and assumption transactions), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Coon v. Ledbetter
5th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dohaish v. Tooley, 670 F.2d 934 (10th Cir.), (right to bring action under civil rights act is personal in nature and does not accrue to a relative), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826 , 103 S.Ct. 60 , 74 L.Ed.2d 63 (1982); English v. Powell, 592 F.2d 727 (4th Cir.1979) (wife had no standing to maintain action arising from husband’s demotion on job); Shaw v. Garrison, 545 F.2d 980 , 983 n. 4 (5th Cir. 1977), rev’d on other grounds sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clancy
v.
Jartech, Inc. and Clancy v. Jartech, Inc.
No. 81-2094; No. 81-2096.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
459 U.S. 826
Cited by 54 opinions  |  Published
4 passages pin-cited by 4 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: N.D. Indiana (2) · E.D. Michigan (1) · Federal Claims (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 666 F. 2d 403.