green
Positive treatment
10.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wyoming v. United States
See Garcia v. United States, 666 F.2d 960, 966 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982) (holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and U.S. Constitution do not waive government’s sovereign immunity); Jaffee v. United States, 592 F.2d 712, 715-18 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 961 , 99 S.Ct. 2406 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1979) (holding that the Constitution does not waive the Government's sovereign immunity in a suit for damages). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nipon v. Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. (In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc.)
(2×)
See id. (citing Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 618 F.2d 950, 953 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McMahon
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc., 646 F.2d 800, 808 (2d Cir. 1981) ("[A] person cannot be held in contempt of an order if he does not have knowledge of the order or if the terms of the order are unclear or ambiguous . . . .") (citations omitted), aff 'd after remand, 673 F.2d 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 (1982); United States v. Greyhound Corp., 508 F.2d 529, 532 (7th Cir. 1974) (stating that the court must determine "whether the order is sufficiently spe- cific and . . . whether the defendant knew or should have known that his conduct was wrongful"); Uni…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel H. McMahon Jr.
(4×)
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc., 646 F.2d 800, 808 (2d Cir.1981) (“[A] person cannot be held in contempt of an order if he does not have knowledge of the order or if the terms of the order are unclear or ambiguous_”) (citations omitted), aff'd after remand, 673 F.2d 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982); United States v. Greyhound Corp., 508 F.2d 529, 532 (7th Cir.1974) (stating that the court must determine “whether the order is sufficiently specific and ,.. whether the defendant knew or should have known that his cond…
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Indus. v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 57 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982). 60 In opposition to the City's request, Local 28 submitted the affidavit of Gary Topple, a Certified Public Accountant.
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Indus, v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 57 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grupke v. Linda Lori Sportswear, Inc.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 618 F.2d 950, 952 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rompan A.S. v. Park Structures, Inc.
(2×)
See Nikon Inc. v. Ikon Corp., 987 F.2d 91, 97 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Perfect Fit Indus. v. Acme Quilting Co., 646 F.2d 800, 805 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Joseph Johnson, United States of America v. Dolores Y. Elliott
See United States v. Kember, 685 F.2d 451, 454 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982); United States v. Kember, 648 F.2d 1354, 1359 (D.C.Cir.1980) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Derrick Miller, United States of America v. Calvin Wallace
(2×)
See United States v. Jones, 676 F.2d 327, 328-29 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982) (where a defendant was not charged until several months after his arrest because the government claimed that the publicity from formally charging him would jeopardize ongoing drug enforcement operations and that during the delay the government was negotiating with the defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 91-02922
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Indus. v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 57 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982); IBM Corp. v. United States, 493 F.2d 112 , 116-17 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 995 , 94 S.Ct. 2409 , 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Glenn Barefoot, A/K/A W.G., A/K/A Norman McGee Head, A/K/A James Earl Griffin, A/K/A Wadius Peritte, United States of America v. Michael Gilbert Parker, United States of America v. Elton Ray Moore, United States of America v. Danny Ray Tucker, A/K/A Danny, United States of America v. Ricky Ray McGee A/K/A Bush, United States of America v. Timothy Allen Grimes, A/K/A Timmy, United States of America v. Jerry Young Parker
See United States v. Keltner, 675 F.2d 602, 605-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schoenberg v. Shapolsky Publishers
(2×)
“A civil contempt sanction may ... serve either to coerce the contemnor into future compliance with the court’s order or to compensate the complainant for losses resulting from the contemnor’s past noncompliance.” Terry, 886 F.2d at 1352 ; see Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 56 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coach Leatherware Company, Inc. v. Anntaylor, Inc.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 618 F.2d 950 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coach Leatherware Co. v. Anntaylor, Inc.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 618 F.2d 950 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cranfill v. Scott & Fetzer Co.
See generally Parsons v. Ford Motor Co., 669 F.2d 308 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982) (Ford had policy prohibiting dealers from selling to non-franchised dealers called bootleggers; plaintiff was terminated because he fraudulently asserted he was a fleet purchaser and not a bootlegger, and summary judgment dismissing his antitrust claim was upheld where Ford and its dealers took steps against him). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Franklin Electronic Publishers, Inc. v. Unisonic Products Corp.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 618 F.2d 950 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
A district court has “a measure of discretion” to retain jurisdiction over local charges after the federal claims have been removed from a case. 2 United States v. Koritko, 870 F.2d 738, 740 (D.C.Cir.1989); see United States v. Kember, 685 F.2d 451, 454 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982) (Kember II); United States v. Smith, 729 F.Supp. 1380, 1386 (D.D.C.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Francis S. Denney, Inc. v. I.S. Laboratories, Inc.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 618 F.2d 950, 953 (2d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Cancer Research Institute, Inc. v. Cancer Research Society, Inc.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 56-57 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982); Vuitton et Fils, S.A. v. Carousel Handbags, 592 F.2d 126, 130 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 726 F.Supp. 943, 949 (S.D.N.Y.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hinton v. Sullivan
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 56-57 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Patterson
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Ind. v. Acme Qualiting Co., 646 F.2d 800 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd, 673 F.2d 53 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Bachman Co.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 618 F.2d 950, 952-53 (2d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982) (under New York law, senior user not required to establish secondary meaning for trade dress infringement claim).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ayer
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc., 673 F.2d 53, 56 (2d Cir.) (civil contempt sanction may serve purpose of coercing contemnor into future compliance with court order, and district court has broad discretion in designing remedy to bring about compliance, taking into account likelihood of effectiveness of particular sanction, harm resulting from continued noncompliance, and burden on contemnor), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. United States
See, Garcia v. United States, 666 F.2d 960, 966 (5th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982); Hohri v. United States, 782 F.2d 227, 245 (D.C.Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Laura Sue Durrenberger Smith, and Martha Durrenberger McKnight Plaintiffs v. Gary Booth, District Director, I.R.S., and the United States of America
See Garcia v. United States, 666 F.2d 960, 966 (Former 5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
WOE BY WOE v. Cuomo
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 646 F.2d 800, 806 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982) (“It is well settled that the district court’s equity jurisdiction empowers it ‘to mould each decree to the necessities of the particular case.’ Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321, 329 [ 64 S.Ct. 587, 591 , 88 L.Ed. 754 ] (1944); Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937, 947 (2d Cir.1969).”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dorta
(2×)
See United States v. Keltner, 675 F.2d 602, 605-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon Elesvan Dorta, A/K/A Raymond Dorchester, United States of America v. Luis German Laverde, United States of America v. Donald Bruce Knight, United States of America v. Renn Drum, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Keltner, 675 F.2d 602, 605-06 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982). 16 The appellants also assert error in the trial court's refusal to give Appellant Drum's requested jury instructions on the elements of conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
Towle Manufacturing Co. v. Godinger Silver Art Co.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc., 618 F.2d 950, 955 (2d Cir.1980) (plaintiff not entitled to monetary relief in absence of proof that similarities in trade dress resulted in actual consumer confusion), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Abraham Zion Corp. v. Lebow
(4×)
See Perfect Fit Ind., Inc. v. Acme Quilting, Co., Inc., 618 F.2d 950, 952-53 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
N.A. Sales Company, Inc. v. Chapman Industries Corp.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Industries v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
McKay v. Communispond, Inc.
(2×)
See Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 646 F.2d 800, 808 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Extradition of Zhenly Ye Gon
Sept. 5, 2007) (“A defendant who challenges extradition is limited to evidence which explains, rather than contradicts, the government’s proof.”); see also United States v. Kember, 685 F.2d 451, 456 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rzayeva v. United States
Doe v. Civiletti, 635 F.2d 88, 94 (2d Cir.1980); see also Garcia v. United States, 666 F.2d 960, 966 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cummins
See, e.g., People v. Constant, 645 P.2d 843, 846 (Colo.) (en banc) (“[a] prosecutor may draw reasonable inferences as to the demeanor and credibility of witnesses"), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982); People v. Sanders, 168 Ill.App.3d 295 , 119 Ill.Dec. 53, 59 , 522 N.E.2d 715, 721 (1988) ("[credibility of a witness is a proper subject for closing argument”). 16 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Michael Wesley O'banion, Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., Garcia v. United States, 666 F.2d 960, 963 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Time Inc. Magazine Co. v. Globe Communications Corp.
(2×)
Harlequin, 644 F.2d 946 at 950 ; see also Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 618 F.2d 950 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Oral Research Laboratories, Inc. v. L. Perrigo Company
See, e.g., Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 646 F.2d 800, 807 , 210 USPQ 175, 181 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. City of Yonkers
(2×)
See Vuitton et Fils S.A. v. Carousel Handbags, 592 F.2d 126, 130 (2d Cir.1979); see also Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 57 (2d Cir.) (level of corporate profits relevant in determining whether coercive fine is “confiscatory”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. City Of Yonkers
(2×)
See Vuitton et Fils S.A. v. Carousel Handbags, 592 F.2d 126, 130 (2d Cir.1979); see also Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., 673 F.2d 53, 57 (2d Cir.) (level of corporate profits relevant in determining whether coercive fine is "confiscatory"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982). 64 The fact that a coercive monetary sanction requires payment of a large daily fine does not necessarily render that sanction beyond the discretion of a district court.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel W. O'connell, A/K/A Edward Smith, United States of America v. Gregory J. Cooke, United States of America v. Patrick Basil Collier, United States of America v. William R. Patterson, Ii, United States of America v. Richard Allen St. Cyr, A/K/A Dexter
(2×)
See also United States v. Jones, 676 F.2d 327, 332 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. O'Connell
(2×)
See also United States v. Jones, 676 F.2d 327, 332 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bucey
(2×)
See Manning v. Seely Tube & Box Co., 338 U.S. 561, 566 , 70 S.Ct. 386, 389 , 94 L.Ed. 346 (1950) (“Congress intended the United States to have the use of money lawfully due when it became due”); See also United States v. Keltner, 675 F.2d 602, 604 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 71 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982) (the government is entitled to tax revenues as soon as the taxable year ends).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thirion
It is clear ... that even as the speciality doctrine has been defined and broadened in this century, it has never been construed to permit foreign intrusion into the evidentiary or procedural rules of the requisitioning state, as distinguished from limiting the jurisdiction of domestic courts to “try or punish the fugitive for any crimes committed before the extradition, except the crimes for which he was extradited.” United States v. Flores, 538 F.2d 939, 944 (2d Cir.1976) (quoting Friedmann, Lissitzyn & Pugh, International Law 493 (1969)); see also United States v. Kember, 685 F.2d 451, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Norman Bernard Thirion A/K/A Norman Tyrone A/K/A Dr. Thirion, United States of America v. Ronald A. Sablosky, United States of America v. Jack Casperson
Consequently, the issue is whether the doctrine of speciality prohibits the government from establishing Thirion's membership in the conspiracy as an evidentiary fact to prove guilt in the other substantive crimes. 25 The courts which have addressed this issue concluded that the doctrine of speciality does not alter existing rules of evidence or procedure. 26 It is clear ... that even as the speciality doctrine has been defined and broadened in this century, it has never been construed to permit foreign intrusion into the evidentiary or procedural rules of the requisitioning state, as distingu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Hohri v. United States
(2×)
See also Garcia v. United States, 666 F.2d 960, 966 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982). 43 B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rick v. Buchansky
(2×)
See, e.g., Perfect Fit Indus., Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc., 618 F.2d 950, 955 (2d Cir.1980), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olympia Co., Inc. v. Celotex Corp.
See, e.g., Parsons v. Ford Motor Co., 669 F.2d 308, 313 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982); Southern Concrete Co. v. United States Steel Corp., 535 F.2d 313, 318 (5th Cir.1976); Solomon v. Houston Corrugated Box Co., 526 F.2d 389, 395-397 (5th Cir.1976); Scranton Construction Co. v. Litton Industries Leasing Corp., 494 F.2d 778, 782 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1105 , 95 S.Ct. 774 , 42 L.Ed.2d 800 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Irving Trust Co. v. Braswell
(2×)
See also Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc., 646 F.2d 800, 806 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 73 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982); (“State law does not govern the scope of the equity powers of the federal court; and this is so even when state law supplies the rules of decision,”); Clark Equipment Co. v. Armstrong Equipment Co., 431 F.2d 54, 56 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 434 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 909 , 91 S.Ct. 1382 , 28 L.Ed.2d 650 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Keltner
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-2223.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.