Pinto v. United States, 459 U.S. 879 (1982). · Go Syfert
Pinto v. United States, 459 U.S. 879 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
109 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 34 distinct courts.
Negative lean: 7th  ·  Positive lean: DC, 9th, 2nd
Strongest positive: Babcock (massappct, 2008-05-08) · Strongest negative: American Paper Institute, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (ca7, 1989-11-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" American Paper Institute, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 673 F.2d 400 , 402 n. 4, 404 n. 14 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 175 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 (1982); Currie, Judicial Review Under Federal Pollution Laws, 62 Iowa L.Rev. 1221, 1227-28 (1978).
discussed Cited "but see" American Paper Institute, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 673 F.2d 400 , 402 n. 4, 404 n. 14 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 175 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 (1982); Currie, Judicial Review Under Federal Pollution Laws, 62 Iowa L.Rev. 1221, 1227-28 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Babcock
Mass. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Diaz, 834 F.2d 287, 290 (2d Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 818 (1988), quoting from McClain v. United States, 676 F.2d 915, 918 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 (1982) (“[cjonsecutive sentences were mandatory in this case under section 924[c] and the sentences were truly interdependent”); United States v. Russell, 917 F.2d 512, 513 (11th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 953 (1991) (imposition of aggregate sentence for § 924[c] and underlying felony violation); United States v. Easterling, 157 F.3d 1220, 1223 (10th Cir. 1998), quoting from United States v. M…
discussed Cited "see" Hicks v. Duckworth
N.D. Ind. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, McClain v. United States, 676 F.2d 915 (2nd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 174 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 (1982); United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3rd Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Carl P. Fogel
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See McClain v. United States, 676 F.2d 915 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 174 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 (1982); United States v. Busic, 639 F.2d 940 (3d Cir. 1981), cert, denied, 452 U.S. 918 , 101 S.Ct. 3055 , 69 L.Ed.2d 422 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Cooling Systems and Flexibles, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiff v. Stuart Radiator, Inc., Stuart-Western, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jartech, Inc. v. Clancy, 666 F.2d 403, 407 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 175 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 , reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1059 , 103 S.Ct. 477 , 74 L.Ed.2d 624 , second reh’g denied, 463 U.S. 1237 , 104 S.Ct. 33 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1453 (1983); cf. See v. Durang, 711 F.2d 141, 144 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (weak argument on substantial similarity not so frivolous as to justify an award of attorneys’ fees).
cited Cited "see" National Labor Relations Board v. Cer Inc.
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 658 F.2d 968 , 984 n. 18 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 175 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gordils v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, the Second Circuit has held that, in certain circumstances, a sentencing judge may “increase a sentence on a specific count where the .original sentence was imposed as part of a ‘package’ that included a mandatory consecutive sentence which was subsequently found to be invalid.” United States v. Gelb, 944 F.2d 52, 59 (2d Cir.1991); see also McClain v. United States, 676 F.2d 915, 917 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 174 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rico, Appeal of Elizabeth Baron, A/K/A \Yolanda Mercado\""
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. at 132-38 , 101 S.Ct. at 434-38 ; Bozza, 330 U.S. at 166 , 67 S.Ct. at 648 ; see also McClain v. United States, 676 F.2d 915, 918 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 174 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." June Roth v. Ilene Pritikin, as of the Estate of Nathan Pritikin, and Patrick M. McGrady
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
Prevailing defendants are granted such fees only when the “court finds plaintiff’s suit to have been baseless, frivolous, unreasonable, or brought in bad faith.” Grosset & Dunlap, 534 F.Supp. at 610 ; see also Jartech, Inc. v. Clancy, 666 F.2d 403, 407 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 879 , 103 S.Ct. 175 , 74 L.Ed.2d 143 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pinto
v.
United States
No. 81-2088.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
459 U.S. 879
Certio, Rari.
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan would grant certio-rari.