green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases ·
“A district court may decertify a class if it appears that the requirements of Rule 23 are not in fact met”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ziemack v. Centel Corp.
class certification motions are not subject to the same standards as motions for dismissal for failure to state a claim or for summary judgment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Prudential Securities Inc. Ltd. Partnership Litigation
a district court may decertify a class if it appears that the requirements of rule 23 are not in fact met
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Hills
See United States v. Steele, 685 F.2d 793, 808 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stevens v. Inphonic, Inc.
See In re Health Mgmt., Inc., 184 F.R.D. 40, 44 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) (quoting Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc., 673 F.2d 566, 572 (2d Cir. 1982), cert denied 459 U.S. 838 , and cert denied, 459 U.S. 908 (1982) (holding that whether a disclosure was curative should not be decided on a motion to dismiss where there is a "substantial question[] of fact" regarding the scope or time limit of a class)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stevens v. InPhonic, Inc.
See In re Health Mgmt., Inc., 184 F.R.D. 40, 44 (E.D.N.Y.1999) (quoting Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc., 673 F.2d 566, 572 (2d Cir.1982), cert denied 459 U.S. 838 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 80 , and cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982) (holding that whether a disclosure was curative should not be decided on a motion to dismiss where there is a “substantial question[ ] of fact” regarding the scope or time *129 limit of a class)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stevens v. Inphonic, Inc.
See In re Health Mgmt., Inc., 184 F.R.D. 40, 44 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) (quoting Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc., 673 F.2d 566, 572 (2d Cir. 1982), cert denied 459 U.S. 838 , and cert denied, 459 U.S. 908 (1982) (holding that whether a disclosure was curative should not be decided on a motion to dismiss where there is a "substantial question[] of fact" regarding the scope or time limit of a class)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Water Craft Management, L.L.C. v. Mercury Marine
See Borden Company v. FTC, 381 F.2d 175 (5th Cir.1967), which required a competitive advantage by which competition could be injured and that one customer be favored over another. 31 . 670 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 212 , 74 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982). 32 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Trustee v. Garvey, Schubert & Barer (In Re Century Cleaning Services, Inc.)
See In re Century Cleaning Services, 202 B.R. at 153 (Bankr.D.Or.1996) (citing Matter of Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc., 671 F.2d 221, 230 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 212 , 74 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982)); see also Brannon v. Gay, 527 F.2d 799, 801 (7th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.
See Sirota v. Solitron Devices, 673 F.2d 566 , 570-71 (2d Cir.) (pre-certification inquiry inappropriate because class certification motions are subject to less rigorous procedural standards than motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 838 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 80 , 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982); Brickman v. Tyco Toys, Inc., 731 F.Supp. 101, 107 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (district court may not look to merits of securities fraud claim in determining whether class certification is appropriate).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Farmland Dairy Farms, Inc.
Accord, Pomanowski v. Monmouth County Bd. of Realtors, 89 N.J. 306, 315-16 , 446 A.2d 83 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982); Finlay & Assocs., Inc. v. Borg-Warner, Corp., 146 N.J.Super. 210, 228-30 , 369 A.2d 541 (Law Div.1976), aff'd, 155 N.J.Super. 331 , 382 A.2d 933 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 77 N.J. 467 , 391 A.2d 483 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. Holle
See In re Innkeepers of New Castle, 671 F.2d 221 , 226 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 212 , 74 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982); Federal’s, Inc., supra, 555 F.2d at 579 ; In re Alfar, supra, 458 F.2d at 1261-62 ; In re American Nat'l Trust, supra, 426 F.2d at 1064 . 37 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maling
See United States v. Steele, 685 F.2d 793, 803 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juwhan Yun
See United States v. Steele, 685 F.2d 793, 804 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982) (“When a defendant has produced sufficient evidence to make a prima facie case of withdrawal ... [the government] must rebut the prima facie showing either by impeaching the defendant’s proof or by going forward with evidence of some conduct in furtherance of the conspiracy subsequent to the act of withdrawal.”) Moreover, the court added the words “not something else,” which appropriately addressed the concerns raised by defense counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Income Tax Protest
See, Bogner v. State Dept ., note 4, 107 Idaho at 856 , 693 P.2d at 1058 , supra and George, Inc. v. Norberg, ___ R.I. ___, 444 A.2d 868, 870 (1982), cert denied 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 214 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flint Resources Co. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
See, Bogner v. State Dept., note 4, 107 Idaho at 856 , 693 P.2d at 1058 , supra and George, Inc. v. Horherg, — R.I.-, 444 A.2d 868, 870 (1982), cert denied 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 214 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mohamed Salim, A/K/A Abdul Qazi, A/K/A Mohamed Ali
See generally United States v. Steele, 685 F.2d 793 (3d Cir.) (approving use of letters rogatory in connection with Fed.R.Crim.P. 15), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eldon Earl \Bud\" Cutler"
See United States v. Steele, 685 F.2d 793, 809 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (“Fed.R.Crim.P. 15 ... does not authorize [depositions] as a means of discovery”); 1 Simon v. United States, 644 F.2d 490 , 498 n. 12 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pope v. Bond
See United States v. Steele, 685 F.2d 793 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982) (officer’s resignation from corporation is prima facie withdrawal from criminal conspiracy absent some conduct in furtherance of conspiracy subsequent to resignation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship Corporation
See United States v. Steele, 685 F.2d 793, 808 (3d Cir.) (once the threshold of logical relevance is satisfied, “the matter is largely within the discretion of the trial court”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982); United States v. Robinson, 560 F.2d 507, 515 (2d Cir.1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 905 , 98 S.Ct. 1451 , 55 L.Ed.2d 496 (1978); 1 J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bobby McGory
See also United States v. Steele, 685 F.2d 793, 803-04 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prineville Sawmill Company, Inc. v. The United States
See, e.g., Caffall Bros., 678 F.2d 1071 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 212 , 74 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982); Webco Lumber, Inc. v. United States, 677 F.2d 860 , 230 Ct.Cl. 457 (1982); Russell & Pugh Lumber Co. v. United States, 290 F.2d 938 , 154 Ct.Cl. 122 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leahy v. Federal Express Corp.
See, e.g., Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc., 673 F.2d 566, 573 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 838 , 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 80 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982); Mattivi v. South African Marine Corp., “Huguenot”, 618 F.2d 163, 167-68 (2d Cir.1980); DC Comics, Inc. v. Filmation Associates, 486 F.Supp. 1273, 1278 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Garzilli v. Howard Johnson’s Motor Lodges, Inc., 419 F.Supp. 1210, 1211 (E.D.N.Y.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. Kleindienst
(2×)
See, e.g., Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc., 673 F.2d 566, 570-72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 838 , 103 S.Ct. 86 , 74 L.Ed.2d 80 and 459 U.S. 908 , 103 S.Ct. 213 , 74 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982); Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union No. 130, 657 F.2d 890, 895 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1710 , 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Doctor v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 540 F.2d 699 , 707-09 (4th Cir.1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. Truett Payne Co., Inc.
v.
Chrysler Motors Corp.
v.
Chrysler Motors Corp.
No. 82-212.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.