green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“the exercise of discretion ... will be judged by the amount of time the jury deliberates in light of the nature of the case and evidence”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Ramseur
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the exercise of discretion ... will be judged by the amount of time the jury deliberates in light of the nature of the case and evidence
cited
Cited "see"
Dailey v. State
See Riley v. State, 413 So.2d 1173 (Fla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 317 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartman v. Duffy
See Hill v. Western Electric, 672 F.2d 381 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); Goodman v. Lukens Steel, 777 F.2d 113 (3d Cir.), aff'd, 482 U.S. 656 , 107 S.Ct. 2617 , 96 L.Ed.2d 572 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Fleet Aerospace Corporation v. Mark Holderman
See Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See, Berryhill v. State, 249 Ga. 442 , 291 S.E.2d 685 (1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 317 , 74 L.Ed.2d 293 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilt
See State v. McDowell, 312 N.W.2d 301 (N.D.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lara v. State
See Elledge v. State, 408 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 316 , 74 L.Ed.2d 293 , 67 L.Ed.2d 825 (1982); King v. State, 390 So.2d 315 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 989 , 101 S.Ct. 1529 (1981); Lucas v. State, 376 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Uzzell v. Friday
See Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); Brink v. Da Lesio, 667 F.2d 420 , 428-29 (4th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. DiFrisco
(2×)
See Ramseur, supra , 106 N.J. at 303, 524 A. 2d 188 ; see also Berryhill v. State, 249 Ga. 442 , 291 S.E. 2d 685, 694 (holding that deliberations of more than ten hours in capital case were insufficient), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 317 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 293 (1982); State v. Thompson, 516 So. 2d 349, 355-56 (La. 1987) (holding that trial court's instructions to capital jury to continue deliberations after jury indicated in open court that it was deadlocked eleven to one but wanted to return to jury room was not abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 871 , 109 S.Ct. 180 , 102 L.Ed.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerald Eugene Stano v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth
(2×)
Francois v. State, 407 So.2d 885, 890 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1122 , 102 S.Ct. 3511 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1384 (1982); see also Elledge v. State, 346 So.2d 998, 1001 (Fla.1977) (no error in admission of circumstances leading to conviction to aid analysis of defendant’s character), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 316 , 74 L.Ed.2d 293 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelaita v. Director
See also Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982). 10 Kelaita argues that the last responsible employer rule is not a rule of substantive law.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelaita v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
See also Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. Kleindienst
(2×)
See, e.g., Hill v. Western Electric Co., 672 F.2d 381, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 981 , 103 S.Ct. 318 , 74 L.Ed.2d 294 (1982); Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991, 995-96 (3d Cir.1976); Developments in the Law--Class Actions, 89 Harv.L.R. 1318, 1491-92 (1976). 27 On the other hand, serious drawbacks to the maintenance of a class action are presented where initial determinations, such as the issue of liability vel non, turn upon highly individualized facts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elledge
v.
Florida Berryhill v. Georgia Riley v. Florida Brown v. Zant, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
v.
Florida Berryhill v. Georgia Riley v. Florida Brown v. Zant, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
No. 81-6813; No. 82-5317; No. 82-5348; No. 82-5373.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1982.
Lead Opinion
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.; and
Super. Ct. Ga., Butts County. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 81-6813, 408 So. 2d 1021; No. 82-5317, 249 Ga. 442, 291 S. E. 2d 685; No. 82-5348, 413 So. 2d 1173.
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.