Karapinka v. United States, 460 U.S. 1053 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Karapinka v. United States, 460 U.S. 1053 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the loss of a defendant's right to object is based on a forfeiture theory because the loss rests on the defendant's misconduct, not on the defendant's intentional relinquishment of a known right”
60 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 32 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Edwards (mass, 2005-07-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Edwards
Mass. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the loss of a defendant's right to object is based on a forfeiture theory because the loss rests on the defendant's misconduct, not on the defendant's intentional relinquishment of a known right
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Clark v. Rose
M.D. Tenn. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
constitutionally defective instructions impose an improper framework for the evaluation of all evidence and can virtually never be harmless.
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Szerlong
Mass. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Steele v. Taylor, 684 F.2d 1193, 1203 (6th Cir. 1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1053 (1983); United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 650-651 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 422 U.S. 1008 (1975).
cited Cited "see" Thomas v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Lewis, 88 Ill.2d 429 , 58 Ill.Dec. 743 , 430 N.E.2d 994 (Ill.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1053 , 103 S.Ct. 1501 , 75 L.Ed.2d 932 (1983); Ex parte Bell, 511 So.2d 519 (Ala.Crim.App.
cited Cited "see" Cochran v. Commonwealth
Va. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnston, 685 F.2d 934, 939 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1053 (1983); United States v. Hawkins, 681 F.2d 1343, 1345 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 994 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Steele v. Taylor, 684 F.2d 1193, 1204 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1053 , 103 S.Ct. 1501 , 75 L.Ed.2d 932 (1983) (“Manifest intent will not be found ‘if some other explanation for his remark is equally possible,’ ” quoting Robinson, 651 F.2d at 1197 ).
discussed Cited "see" Gary Glenn Cooper and Robert Earl Calloway v. Gene Scroggy, Superintendent, Kentucky State Penitentiary, and David L. Armstrong, Attorney General (2×)
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 66 , 100 S.Ct. 2531, 2539 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980), and this Court's extended discussion of the standard in Steele v. Taylor, 684 F.2d 1193, 1200-04 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1053 , 103 S.Ct. 1501 , 75 L.Ed.2d 932 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Frederick Spalla v. Dale Foltz
6th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Steele v. Taylor, 684 F.2d 1193, 1204 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1053 , 103 S.Ct. 1501 , 75 L.Ed.2d 932 (1983) (“Manifest intent will not be found ‘if some other explanation for his remark is equally plausible,’ ” quoting Robinson, 651 F.2d at 1197 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Nelson Bernardo Gomez-Lemos (2×)
6th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Steele v. Taylor, 684 F.2d 1193, 1200-02 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1053 , 103 S.Ct. 1501 , 75 L.Ed.2d 932 (1983); United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616, 632-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008 , 102 S.Ct. 2300 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Karapinka
v.
United States
No. 82-1370.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1983.
460 U.S. 1053
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1) · M.D. Tennessee (1)

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.