green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
12.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…when confronted with a demand for an offer of proof," questioner must "provide some good faith basis for questioning that alleges adverse facts
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Liu v. Republic of China
But cf. Clayco Petroleum Corp. v. Occidental Corp., 712 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984) (suggesting a willingness to limit judicial inquiries solely on the basis that they would “impugn or question the nobility of a foreign nation’s motivation”).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hynes v. Coughlin
when confronted with a demand for an offer of proof," questioner must "provide some good faith basis for questioning that alleges adverse facts
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hynes v. Coughlin
when confronted with a demand for an offer of proof," questioner must "provide some good faith basis for questioning that alleges adverse facts
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Whitfield v. Cohen
courts have also recognized that in enacting erisa congress made more exacting the requirements of the common law of trusts relating to employee benefit trust funds.
cited
Cited "see"
Dillard v. Musgrove
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, 712 F.2d 899 , 903 n. 3 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984). ¶ 25.
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. James Payton, AKA James Perkins, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See generally United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 778-79 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Newton
People v. Moore, supra; see United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769 (2d Cir.1983), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pepsi-Cola Co. v. Rhode Island Carpenters District Council
See Abreen Corp. v. Laborers' Int’l Union, 709 F.2d 748 , 755 (1st Cir.1983) (acknowledging Moore Dry Dock as an evidentiary tool), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 702 , 79 L.Ed.2d 167 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Local 38 United Ass'n Pension Trust Fund v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 (1984). 5 After Aetna refused to provide a defense or indemnification, the appellants brought the present action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shillinger v. Haworth
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 698 F.2d 486 , 493 n. 22 (D.C.Cir.) (noting that "[a] deliberate attempt by the government to obtain defense strategy information or to otherwise interfere with the attorney-defendant relationship through the use of an undercover agent may constitute a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment"), reh'g granted, opinion vacated, and on reh'g, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); United States v. Morales, 635 F.2d 177, 179 (2d Cir.1980) ("[B]ecause the ... evidence ... does not disclose an intentional, governmenta…
discussed
Cited "see"
Shillinger v. Haworth
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 698 F.2d 486 , 493 n. 22 (D.C.Cir.) (noting that “[a] deliberate attempt by the government to obtain defense strategy information or to otherwise interfere with the attorney-defendant relationship through the use of an undercover agent may constitute a per se violation of the Sixth Amendment”), reh’g granted, opinion vacated, and on reh’g, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); United States v. Morales, 635 F.2d 177, 179 (2d Cir.1980) (“[Bjecause the ... evidence ... does not disclose an intentional, g…
cited
Cited "see"
Hook v. State of Ariz.
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1240 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mason Tenders Dist. Council of Greater NY
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir.1983) (“reliance on counsel’s advice, without more, cannot be a complete defense to an imprudence charge”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); Katsaros v. Cody, 568 F.Supp. 360 , 369 n. 12 (E.D.N.Y.1983) (“the retention of counsel ... does not relieve a fiduciary of his duty to investigate”), aff'd, 744 F.2d 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mason
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Reid v. New Hampshire
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984) (prosecutor who gives peijured testimony is entitled to absolute immunity under Briscoe but not Imbler). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
Keener v. State
See State v. Alaska Land Title Ass’n, 667 P.2d 714 (Alaska 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); State, Dep’t of Highways v. Green, 586 P.2d 595 (Alaska 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carson Friend Collene Friend Brad Friend Trav Friend Carson Lighting, Inc. Carson Lighting, Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Sanwa Bank California
(2×)
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 488 , 74 L.Ed.2d 631 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Cerrato v. San Francisco Community College District
See Bratton v. City of Detroit, 704 F.2d 878, 898 (6th Cir.1983) (“We find, however, that the issue of the validity of an affirmative action plan is a question of law, to be determined by the court and not the jury.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); Setser v. Novack Investment Co., 657 F.2d 962, 969 (8th Cir.1981) (“The issue of the validity of an affirmative action plan is one for the court and not the jury.”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1064 , 102 S.Ct. 615 , 70 L.Ed.2d 601 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Malaki Shakur Latine, A/K/A Gregory Latine v. Louis F. Mann, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 775 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald G. Roth Logan M. Ammon v. Sawyer-Cleator Lumber Company, Employee Stock Ownership Plan Charles J. Sawyer Clifford E. Sawyer
See id. (asking whether “ ‘trustees, at the time they engaged in the challenged transactions, employed the appropriate methods to investigate the merits of the investment and to structure the investment’ ”) (quoting Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1232 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richmark Corp., a California Corporation v. Timber Falling Consultants, an Oregon Corporation, Timber Falling Consultants, an Oregon Corporation, Counterclaim v. Richmark Corp., a California Corporation, Peacock Mfg. Co., a Texas Corporation, Zhu Yuanchang, Eugene Wang, James Yang, and Francis Tong, Counterclaim and Beijing Ever Bright Industrial Co., a Foreign Corporation, Counterclaim
In Whittaker Corp. v. Execuair Corp., 953 F.2d 510, 516 (9th Cir.1992), the Ninth Circuit held that civil contempt could be used to coerce defendants into posting a bond because such an order "imposed a duty to post security, not a duty to pay a judgment...." Id.; accord Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 , 1239 n. 9 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants
In Whittaker Corp. v. Execuair Corp., 953 F.2d 510, 516 (9th Cir.1992), the Ninth Circuit held that civil contempt could be used to coerce defendants into posting a bond because such an order "imposed a duty to post security, not a duty to pay a judgment....” Id.; accord Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 , 1239 n. 9 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kiewert
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 778 (2d Cir. 1983) (statements to wife tended to subject declarant to criminal liability and such marital communications were corroborated by other evidence), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 (1984); Proposed Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Aclu Foundation of Southern California v. William P. Barr
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 698 F.2d 486 (D.C.Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 712 F.2d 1444 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cain v. Armstrong World Industries
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 712 F.2d 899 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) and 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984) (New trial granted due to prejudicial effect of consolidation of actions against airlines and their insurers).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas Cosgrove, Husband, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Matilda June Cosgrove, Wife, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Circle K Corporation, a Texas Corporation, Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc., a Texas Corporation Fred Hervey, Thomas Cosgrove, Husband, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Matilda June Cosgrove, Wife, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Circle K Corporation, a Texas Corporation, Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc., a Texas Corporation Fred Hervey, Millard O. Orick, Bill J. Farmer, Robert Hutchinson, Fred Hervey Interests Employees Retirement Plan, Thomas Cosgrove, Husband, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Matilda June Cosgrove, Wife, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Valley National Bank, and Charles Shoumaker, Karl Eller, H.R. Fenstermacher, W.A. Franke, Dean P. Guerin, John P. Harbin, Carl H. Lindner, Keith E. Lindner, Robert M. Reade, A. Jerry Busby, Jane Doe Shoumaker, Wife, Jane Doe Eller, Wife, Jane Doe Fenstermacher, Wife, Jane Doe, Wife, Jane Doe Guerin, Wife, Jane Doe Harbin, Wife, Jane Doe Lindner, Wife to Keith E. Lindner, Jane Doe Reade, Wife
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984) (proposition not stated, but court's discussion appears to assume it).
cited
Cited "see"
James v. State
See State v. Alaska Land Title Ass’n, 667 P.2d 714, 725 (Alaska 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Keith Vernor
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 775 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Victorson v. Department of Treasury
(2×)
See Baker v Detroit, 483 F Supp 930, 994 (ED Mich, 1979), aff'd sub nom Bratton v Detroit, 704 F2d 878 (CA 6, 1983), cert den 464 US 1040 ; 104 S Ct 703 ; 79 L Ed 2d 168 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Pension Fund-Mid Jersey Trucking Industry-Local 701 v. Omni Funding Group
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 L.Ed.2d 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamento
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamento
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Insurance Company of North America, Inc. v. U.S. Gypsum Company, Inc.
See Arnold v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186, 199-200 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 on rehearing, Arnold v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 712 F.2d 899 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drago v. Celotex Corp.
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186, 193 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) and 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Messerli v. Department of Natural Resources
See State v. Alaska Land Title Ass’n, 667 P.2d 714, 725 (Alaska 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Harvey Hampton, Jr. v. J.S. Mathis Mike Moretz, James Harvey Hampton, Jr. v. J.S. Mathis Mike Moretz
See Arnold v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186, 211 (4th Cir.1987) (Murnaghan, J., dissenting) (adopted by majority on rehearing en banc, 712 F.2d 899 , 906 (1983)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ellery Queen
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769 , 776 n. 7 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (district court has jurisdiction to impose sanctions for violation of a post-conviction release condition); Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 (district court has jurisdiction to correct clerical errors in record).
discussed
Cited "see"
Environmental Tectonics v. W.S. Kirkpatrick, Inc.
See id. at 1393 . 14 In reaching its conclusion, the district court relied primarily on the interpretation of the act of state doctrine advanced in a Ninth Circuit case, Clayco Petroleum v. Occidental Petroleum, 712 F.2d 404 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blackwell v. Transamerica Occidental Life
See Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226, 1233-35 (9th Cir.1983) (trustees breached duty under ERISA by negligently selecting unqualified consultant), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1983); Kaszuk v. Bakery and Confectionary Union, 638 F.Supp. 365, 371 (N.D.Ill.1984) (liability for failure to comply with notice provisions of Fund), aff'd, 791 F.2d 548 (7th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
See 704 F.2d 878 (6th Cir.) (Bratton I ), modified, 712 F.2d 222 (6th Cir.1983) (Bratton II ), aff'g Baker v. City of Detroit, 504 F.Supp. 841 (E.D.Mich.1980), modifying 483 F.Supp. 930 (E.D.Mich.1979), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Behre v. Thomas
See Briggs v. Goodwin, 712 F.2d 1444, 1448-49 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hernandez
While we agree with the defendant that the trial court improperly determined that it must evaluate the credibility of the in-court witness; see United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S. Ct. 704 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
N.A.A.C.P., Detroit Branch v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'n
See 704 F.2d 878 (6th Cir.) (Bratton I), modified, 712 F.2d 222 (6th Cir.1983) (Bratton II), aff'g Baker v. City of Detroit, 504 F.Supp. 841 (E.D.Mich.1980), modifying 483 F.Supp. 930 (E.D.Mich.1979), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Riad Youssef Rahme
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 778 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilmington Firefighters Local 1590 v. City of Wilmington
See Bratton v. City of Detroit, 704 F.2d 878, 887 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984); E.E.O.C. v. McCall Printing Corp., 633 F.2d 1232 , 1237-38 (6th Cir.1980); Stotts, 679 F.2d at 558 (6th Cir.), rev'd on other grounds, 467 U.S. 561 , 104 S.Ct. 2576 , 81 L.Ed.2d 483 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Drew
See United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 776-777 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 (1984). 12 Rarely will the defendant’s testimony alone be considered sufficient corroboration for the hearsay statement.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Persico
See, e.g., United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777-78 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rivera
State v. Meehan, 260 Conn. 372, 381 , 796 A.2d 1191 (2002); see also United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 777 (2d Cir. 1983) (“to require a preliminary assessment of the in-court witness’ credibility would ... be a usurpation of the jury function”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S. Ct. 704 , 79 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Archambault
Queen, 847 F.2d at 350 ; United States v. Weber, No. 95-00125-03-CR-W-8, 1997 WL 61442 at **1-2 (W.D.Mo.1997); see also United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d 769, 776, n. 7 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 704 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Massachusetts Laborers District Council
v.
Abreen Corp. and Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO v. Abreen Corp.
v.
Abreen Corp. and Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO v. Abreen Corp.
No. 83-537; No. 83-693.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 709 F. 2d 748.