green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Freiman v. Freiman
In keeping with the strong public policy in favor of individuals resolving their own family disputes (see, Scheinkman, New York Law of Domestic Relations § 6.1, at 123), subdivision (3) authorizes spouses or prospective spouses to contract out of the elaborate statutory system and provide for matters such as inheritance, distribution or division of property, spousal support, and child custody and care in the event that the marriage ends.” (Matisoff v Dobi, 90 NY2d 127, 132 ; see, Avitzur v Avitzur, 58 NY2d 108 , cert denied 464 US 817.) The Appellate Division, Second Department, has held th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rende & Esposito Consultants, Inc. v. St. Augustine's Roman Catholic Church
Nicholas Cathedral, 344 US 94 ), the courts remain free to resolve controversies involving religious groups or organizations where such matters are not implicated and where the dispute can be settled by the application of neutral principles of law (see, Jones v Wolf, 443 US 595 ; Morris v Scribner, 69 NY2d 418 ; see also, Avitzur v Avitzur, 58 NY2d 108 , cert denied 464 US 817 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Florida Tile Co., a Division of Sikes Corp.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 82-1825.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.