green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2000 ·
…no denial of due process occurs if brady material is disclosed in time for its effective use at trial.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Garrett
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
no denial of due process occurs if brady material is disclosed in time for its effective use at trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Trinity Edward Ingle
See United States v. Fitterer, 710 F.2d 1328, 1333 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 165 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983); United States v. Dobbs, 711 F.2d 84, 85 (8th Cir.1983); accord United States v. Myers, 123 F.3d 350, 359 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 611 , 139 L.Ed.2d 498 (1997); United States v. Vasquez, 675 F.2d 16, 17 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Trinity Edward Ingle
See United States v. Fitterer, 710 F.2d 1328, 1333 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 (1983); United States v. Dobbs, 711 F.2d 84, 85 (8th Cir. 1983); accord United States v. Myers, 123 F.3d 350, 359 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 611 (1997); United States v. Vasquez, 675 F.2d 16, 17 (2d Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Package Service Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. DMR Corp., 699 F.2d 788, 791-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983). 9 In deciding whether a parent corporation is liable for its subsidiary's unfair labor practices, the Board cannot ignore the general principle that "[t]he insulation of a stockholder from the debts and obligations of his corporation is the norm, not the exception." NLRB v. Deena Artware, Inc., 361 U.S. 398, 403 , 80 S.Ct. 441, 443 , 4 L.Ed.2d 400 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Package Service Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. DMR Corp., 699 F.2d 788, 791-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis Robinson v. John H. Dalton, Secretary to United States Department of the Navy
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 755 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Dalton
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 755 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 852 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Giampa
“Because Brady [and Giglio ] rest [] on the requirements of due process, focus must be on when disclosure is necessary to insure [the defendant] a fair trial.” United States v. Higgs, 713 F.2d 39, 43 (3d Cir.1983); see United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545, 1549 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 163 , 78 L.Ed.2d 149 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brem v. Drs. Decarlo, Lyon, Hearn & Pazourek, P.A.
See Kappas v. Chestnut Lodge, Inc., 709 F.2d 878, 880 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983) (applying the privilege to staff conferences established as a means of evaluating the patient care and treatment programs at a hospital). 5 Thus, I reject the defendants’ argument that the error management conferences conducted by Dr. "Wheeler do not fall within the purview of the medical review committee statute.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brennan v. National Telephone Directory Corp.
Brennan I, 850 F.Supp. at 340 ; see Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 753 (3d Cir.) (equitable tolling appropriate if (1) the defendant has actively mislead the plaintiff, (2) the plaintiff has been prevented from asserting his rights, or (3) if plaintiff has timely asserted his rights in the wrong forum), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Zeneca Inc.
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 753 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983) (explaining appropriate instances of equitable tolling of statute of limitations); Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 569 F.2d 187, 193 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 87 , 58 L.Ed.2d 113 (1978) (finding equitable tolling appropriate under the ADEA).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blanca Lucero Largo Lopez, United States of America v. Fabio Andres Morante-Andrade, Aka: Pedro Cuartas
See id. 19 Lopez and Morante argue that United States v. Issacs, 708 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 (1983), and United States v. Bagley, 772 F.2d 482 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1023 (1986), preclude the government from arguing to establish possession of cocaine and to deny expectation of privacy where the circumstances of the case make such positions necessarily inconsistent.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph L. Kissinger, United States of America v. Melvin J. Estes
See United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545, 1550 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 (1983). 9 The defendants argue that the district court erred in refusing to allow them to cross-examine John Boulden with respect to his involvement in an earlier incident at the Joneses' residence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Mullins and William H. Young
Bartle, 835 F.2d at 650 ; accord United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer Hammad
See United States v. Fitterer, 710 F.2d 1328, 1333 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 165 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983); Vasquez, 675 F.2d at 17 ; Guerrerio, 675 F.Supp. at 1436 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Christo v. Edward G. Boyle Ins. Agency, Inc.
See Kocian v. Getty Ref. & Mktg Co., 707 F.2d 748 , 754 n.9 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 (1983); Goldman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 607 F.2d 1014 , *819 1017 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 929 (1980); Weise v. Syracuse Univ., 522 F.2d 397, 413 (2d Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer Hammad
See United States v. Fitterer, 710 F.2d 1328, 1333 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 165 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983); Vasquez, 675 F.2d at 17 ; Guerrerio, 675 F.Supp. at 1436 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gabrielle v. Barrett, Haentjens & Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vernon Reiger, Sr. v. Robert Christensen and Tany S. Hong
See United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545, 1549-51 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 163 , 78 L.Ed.2d 149 (1983); cf. Hilliard v. Spalding, 719 F.2d 1443, 1447 (9th Cir.1983) (where exculpatory evidence of sperm sample taken from rape victim in rape case was never furnished to defense, defendant was deprived of due process rights).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Myron R. Ruggles
See United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545, 1552-53 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seredinski, Louise v. Clifton Precision Products Co., a Division of Litton Systems, Inc
(2×)
See Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748 , 752-53 and ns. 4 & 8 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983) (suggesting that the EEOC’s failure to comply with its own regulations requiring deferral to state agency would constitute grounds for equitable tolling in Title VII action); see also McKee v. McDonnell Douglas Technical Services Co., 700 F.2d 260, 264 (5th Cir.1983) (Title VII claimant should not be penalized for EEOC’s failure to follow its own regulations); Hicks v. ABT Associates, Inc., 572 F.2d 960, 964 (3d Cir.1978) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Santiago
(2×)
Compare United States v. Fitterer, 710 F.2d 1328, 1333 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Santiago
Compare United States v. Fitterer, 710 F.2d 1328, 1333 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 78 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grandison v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545, 1550 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 163 , 78 L.Ed.2d 149 (1983) (in determining whether nondisclosure of exculpatory information constituted a denial of due process, “the focus is not upon the fact of nondisclosure, but upon the impact of the nondisclosure on the jury’s verdict”); Floyd v. State, 902 So.2d 775, 778 (Fla.2005) (stating that “the focus in postconviction Brady-Bagley analysis is ultimately the nature and weight of undisclosed information”); State v. Louviere, 833 So.2d 885, 897 (La.2002) (“[W]e ob…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Causey
See also United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545, 1549-1550 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 163 , 78 L.Ed.2d 149 (1983) (in determining whether nondisclosure of exculpatory information constituted a denial of due process, “the focus is not upon the fact of nondisclosure, but upon the impact of the nondisclosure on the jury’s verdict”); United States v. McVeigh, 954 F.Supp. 1441, 1449-1450 (D.Colo.1997) (“[t]here is no established procedure for the due process disclosures required by Brady ... [because] it is not possible to apply the materiality standard ... before t…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roebuck
See 48 U.S.C. § 1614 (a); see also United States v. Canel, 708 *715 F.2d 894 (3d Cir.), cert den., 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 165 , 78 L.Ed.2d 151 (1983). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smart
Compare United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834 (2d Cir. 1988) (applying ethical rule to government’s non-custodial, pre-indictment use of “sham” grand jury subpoena), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S. Ct. 192 (1990) with United States v. Fitterer, 710 F.2d 1328 (8th Cir.) (refusing to apply rule prior to indictment), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 (1983), and United States v. Lemonakis, 485 F.2d 941 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. Board of Regents of State of Kan.
Baker Chemical Corp., 598 F.2d 829 (3d Cir.1979) (no tolling where defendant did nothing to cause untimeliness) with Meyer v. Riegel Products Corp., 720 F.2d 303 (3d Cir.1983), cert. dismissed, 465 U.S. 1091 , 104 S.Ct. 2144 , 79 L.Ed.2d 910 (1984) (tolling possible where plaintiff alleged that defendant deceived him into *1440 postponing the filing of a claim); see also, Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abel Garcia
United States v. Scruggs, 583 F.2d 238, 242 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Avila, 443 F.2d 792, 795 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 944 , 92 S.Ct. 295 , 30 L.Ed.2d 258 (1971); see also United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545, 1551-52 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 163 , 78 L.Ed.2d 149 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alvaro Julio Echavarria-Olarte
The remainder of the wiretap evidence was admissible for impeachment purposes to contradict statements made by Echavarria on cross-examination since the prosecutor’s line of questions eliciting these statements were “proper cross-examination reasonably suggested by the defendant’s direct examination.” Havens , id., at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 1917 ; see also United States v. Issacs, 708 F.2d 1365, 1370-71 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 165 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983). 3.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Eugene Ryans D/B/A Ryans Moving & Storage and Westside Movers
See, e.g., United States v. Fitterer, 710 F.2d 1328, 1333 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 165 , 78 L.Ed.2d 150 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Peterson v. City of Wichita, Kan.
See also Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 753 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 164 , 78 L.Ed. 2d 150 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Forte, Frederick
See, e.g., United States v. Canel, 569 F.Supp. 926, 932-33 (D.V.I.1982), aff'd, 708 F.2d 894 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S.Ct. 165 , 166, 78 L.Ed.2d 151 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pollitt
See, e.g., United States v. Kubiak, 704 F.2d 1545, 1550 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 , 104 S. Ct. 163 , 78 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LTV Federal Credit Union
v.
UMIC Government Securities, Inc.
v.
UMIC Government Securities, Inc.
No. 83-183.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.