Oyster v. Oyster, 464 U.S. 978 (1983). · Go Syfert
Oyster v. Oyster, 464 U.S. 978 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MacE v. Skinner (ca9, 1994-09-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" MacE v. Skinner
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. Brantley, 981 F.2d 514 (11th Cir.1993) and Gaunce v. deVincentis, 708 F.2d 1290 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 417 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983).
cited Cited "see" Mace v. Skinner
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. Brantley, 981 F.2d 514 (11th Cir.1993) and Gaunce v. de-Vincentis, 708 F.2d 1290 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 417 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983).
cited Cited "see" In Re Grand Jury 89-2
E.D. Va. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. (Under Seal), 714 F.2d 347, 350 (4th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 1019 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Application of Larry A. Wood to Appear Before the Grand Jury (Misc. 85-L-02). Appeal of United States of America (2×)
8th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
This court correctly identifies the test for determining when supervisory power may be properly exercised: “given the constitutionally-based independence of each of the three actors — court, prosecutor and grand jury — * * * a court may not exercise its ‘supervisory power’ in a way which encroaches on the prerogatives of the other two unless there is a clear basis in fact and law for doing so.” Id. (footnote omitted); see United States v. (Under Seal), 714 F.2d 347, 350 (4th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 1019 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983) (court must have compelling re…
cited Cited "see" Peter A. Madjiwita v. National Transportation Safety Board Department of Transportation United States Coast Guard
6th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gaunce v. deVincentis, 708 F.2d 1290, 1293 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 978 (1983). 4 For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be and hereby is granted.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant (2×)
11th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bryson, Grand Jury Law and Practice Sec. 10.15, at 57 n. 19 (1986); see also United States v. (Under Seal) (In re Antitrust Grand Jury Investigation), 714 F.2d 347, 351 (4th Cir.) (existence of alternative remedy important in determining whether to quash an indictment), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 1019 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983) Of course, a witness may move to quash a subpoena on the ground that the Government is attempting to harass or embarrass him.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Housing Study Group v. Kemp
D.D.C. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Regis Paper Co. v. Marshall, 591 F.2d 612, 614 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 828 , 100 S.Ct. 55 , 62 L.Ed.2d 36 (1979); Montana Chapter of Ass’n of Civil Technicians, Inc. v. Young, 514 F.2d 1165, 1167-68 (9th Cir.1975); Wallace v. Lynn, 507 F.2d 1186, 1190-91 (D.C.Cir.1974); see also Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752, 772-73 , 67 S.Ct. 1493, 1503 , 91 L.Ed. 1796 (1947). 14 Furthermore, requiring exhaustion will allow the agency to develop a factual record so that judicial resolution of the constitutional issue, if necessary, will not be made in a context “dev…
Oyster
v.
Oyster Schwarz v. Coastal Resources Management Mullen v. Starr Hannan v. Secretary of the Army Hartford v. Arizona Panter v. Miller Polskie Linie Lotnicze (LOT Polish Airlines) v. Robles Gee v. Fung Stevenson v. Conrad Holland v. Guest Quarters Alexander v. Zeanah Wright v. New York Life Insurance Co.
No. 82-1946; No. 82-1991; No. 82-6550; No. 82-6676; No. 82-6971; No. 82-7033; No. 83-5; No. 83-93; No. 83-5114; No. 83-5143; No. 83-5228; No. 83-5254.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1983.
464 U.S. 978
Published

ante, p. 801;

ante, p. 823;

461 U. S. 960; ante, p. 833;

ante, p. 842;

ante, p. 845;

ante, p. 845;

ante, p. 849;

ante, p. 857;

ante, p. 858;

ante, p. 861; and

ante, p. 862. Petitions for rehearing denied.