green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
MacE v. Skinner
See Green v. Brantley, 981 F.2d 514 (11th Cir.1993) and Gaunce v. deVincentis, 708 F.2d 1290 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 417 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Mace v. Skinner
See Green v. Brantley, 981 F.2d 514 (11th Cir.1993) and Gaunce v. de-Vincentis, 708 F.2d 1290 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 417 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury 89-2
See United States v. (Under Seal), 714 F.2d 347, 350 (4th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 1019 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Application of Larry A. Wood to Appear Before the Grand Jury (Misc. 85-L-02). Appeal of United States of America
(2×)
This court correctly identifies the test for determining when supervisory power may be properly exercised: “given the constitutionally-based independence of each of the three actors — court, prosecutor and grand jury — * * * a court may not exercise its ‘supervisory power’ in a way which encroaches on the prerogatives of the other two unless there is a clear basis in fact and law for doing so.” Id. (footnote omitted); see United States v. (Under Seal), 714 F.2d 347, 350 (4th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 1019 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983) (court must have compelling re…
cited
Cited "see"
Peter A. Madjiwita v. National Transportation Safety Board Department of Transportation United States Coast Guard
See Gaunce v. deVincentis, 708 F.2d 1290, 1293 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 978 (1983). 4 For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be and hereby is granted.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant
(2×)
Bryson, Grand Jury Law and Practice Sec. 10.15, at 57 n. 19 (1986); see also United States v. (Under Seal) (In re Antitrust Grand Jury Investigation), 714 F.2d 347, 351 (4th Cir.) (existence of alternative remedy important in determining whether to quash an indictment), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 1019 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983) Of course, a witness may move to quash a subpoena on the ground that the Government is attempting to harass or embarrass him.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Housing Study Group v. Kemp
Regis Paper Co. v. Marshall, 591 F.2d 612, 614 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 828 , 100 S.Ct. 55 , 62 L.Ed.2d 36 (1979); Montana Chapter of Ass’n of Civil Technicians, Inc. v. Young, 514 F.2d 1165, 1167-68 (9th Cir.1975); Wallace v. Lynn, 507 F.2d 1186, 1190-91 (D.C.Cir.1974); see also Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752, 772-73 , 67 S.Ct. 1493, 1503 , 91 L.Ed. 1796 (1947). 14 Furthermore, requiring exhaustion will allow the agency to develop a factual record so that judicial resolution of the constitutional issue, if necessary, will not be made in a context “dev…
Oyster
v.
Oyster Schwarz v. Coastal Resources Management Mullen v. Starr Hannan v. Secretary of the Army Hartford v. Arizona Panter v. Miller Polskie Linie Lotnicze (LOT Polish Airlines) v. Robles Gee v. Fung Stevenson v. Conrad Holland v. Guest Quarters Alexander v. Zeanah Wright v. New York Life Insurance Co.
v.
Oyster Schwarz v. Coastal Resources Management Mullen v. Starr Hannan v. Secretary of the Army Hartford v. Arizona Panter v. Miller Polskie Linie Lotnicze (LOT Polish Airlines) v. Robles Gee v. Fung Stevenson v. Conrad Holland v. Guest Quarters Alexander v. Zeanah Wright v. New York Life Insurance Co.
No. 82-1946; No. 82-1991; No. 82-6550; No. 82-6676; No. 82-6971; No. 82-7033; No. 83-5; No. 83-93; No. 83-5114; No. 83-5143; No. 83-5228; No. 83-5254.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1983.
Published
ante, p. 801;
ante, p. 823;
461 U. S. 960; ante, p. 833;
ante, p. 842;
ante, p. 845;
ante, p. 845;
ante, p. 849;
ante, p. 857;
ante, p. 858;
ante, p. 861; and
ante, p. 862. Petitions for rehearing denied.