green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“HUD certainly could not ignore the dictates of the Privacy Act in promulgating regulations”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
John Doe v. Jay B. Stephens
hud certainly could not ignore the dictates of the privacy act in promulgating regulations
discussed
Cited "see"
45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 245, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5143, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,031, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8275 United States of America v. Morreon B. Rude, United States of America v. Stafford Y.L. Mew, United States of America v. Charles E. Andrews, United States of America v. Rodney H.S. Kim
See United States v. Offices Known as 50 State Distributing Co., 708 F.2d 1371, 1374-75 (9th Cir.1983) (broad search for business records is permissible if probable cause exists to believe fraud permeates the entire business operation), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rude
See United States v. Offices Known as 50 State Distributing Co., 708 F.2d 1371, 1374-75 (9th Cir.1983) (broad search for business records is permissible if probable cause exists to believe fraud permeates the entire business operation), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
National Commodity And Barter Association v. Glenn L. Archer
See United States v. Offices Known as 50 State Distributing Co., 708 F.2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
National Commodity & Barter Ass'n v. Archer
See United States v. Offices Known as 50 State Distributing Co., 708 F.2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin L. Wiseman, United States of America v. Center Art Galleries-Hawaii, Inc., United States of America v. William D. Mett
See United States v. Offices Known as 50 State Distributing Co., 708 F.2d 1371, 1375 (9th Cir. 1983) (citation ommitted), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 (1984). 30 The defendants argue that no materials may be retained by the government under an unconstitutional general warrant "where one of the warrant's provisions, when examined independently, might be considered sufficiently specific." However, our rule is that "where invalid portions of a warrant may be stricken and the remaining portions held valid, seizures pursuant to the valid portions will be sustained." Spilotro, 800 F.2d at 967 . 31 Th…
discussed
Cited "see"
Duke v. Uniroyal, Inc.
See, Pace v. Southern Railway System, 701 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir.1983), cert. den. 464 U.S. 1018 , 104 S.Ct. 549 , 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983), reh. den. 465 U.S. 1054 , 104 S.Ct. 1334 , 79 L.Ed.2d 729 (1984). 1.
cited
Cited "see"
Inter-City Gas Corporation, a Manitoba Corporation v. Boise Cascade Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Inter-City Gas Corporation, a Manitoba Corporation v. Boise Cascade Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
See Adams v. Bell, 711 F.2d 161, 168-70 (D.C.Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Inter-City Gas Corp. v. Boise Cascade Corp.
See Adams v. Bell, 711 F.2d 161, 168-70 (D.C.Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ara Michaelian
See United States v. 50 State Distributing Co., 708 F.2d 1371, 1374-1375 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kissler
Compare Kow, 58 F.3d at 427-28 (primarily legitimate business) and Center Art Galleries-Hawaii, 875 F.2d at 750-51 (warrant sought to uncover evidence of trafficking in forged Salvador Dali prints, but government knew that less than twenty percent of the business conducted on the premises involved illegal transactions) with United States v. Offices Known as 50 State Distributing Company, 708 F.2d 1371, 1374-75 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) (business permeated with fraud) and United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1568 (9th Cir…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Uhl v. Swanstrom
Id.; see also Mondelli v. United States, 711 F.2d 567 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); Lombard v. United States, 690 F.2d 215, 223 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3086 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Mossow, a Minor by Mary Jane Mossow as Mother and Natural Guardian v. United States
See, e.g., Mondelli v. United States, 711 F.2d 567 (3d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); Lombard v. United States, 690 F.2d 215, 223 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3086 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Milton Eugene Robins
See also United States v. Nabors, 707 F.2d 1294, 1302 (11th Cir.1983) (request that court make inquiry to determine whether any evidence was the poisonous fruit of illegal surveillance is insufficient to allege actual monitoring or a causal link between unlawful monitoring and the evidence), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1271 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); In re Dellinger, 357 F.Supp. 949, 961 (N.D.Ill.1973) ( 18 U.S.C. § 3504 (a)(1) not triggered until some showing has been made that a specific item of evidence to be offered by the government would be inadmissible as being illegally deri…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robins
See also United States v. Nabors, 707 F.2d 1294, 1302 (11th Cir.1983) (request that court make inquiry to determine whether any evidence was the poisonous fruit of illegal surveillance is insufficient to allege actual monitoring or a causal link between unlawful monitoring and the evidence), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1271 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); In re Dellinger, 357 F.Supp. 949, 961 (N.D.Ill.1973) ( 18 U.S.C. § 3504 (a)(1) not triggered until some showing has been made that a specific item of evidence to be offered, by the government would be inadmissible as being illegally de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joshua Romero, a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, Clifford A. Romero Clifford A. Romero Roxanna A. Romero v. United States
See, e.g., Mondelli v. United States, 711 F.2d 567 (3d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) (child’s claim for personal injuries sustained as a result of serviceman’s exposure to radioactivity while on active duty Teres-barred); Lombard v. United States, 690 F.2d 215 (D.C.Cir,1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3086 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983) (children’s claims for personal injuries sustained as a result of servicemen’s exposure to radiation during atomic bomb project Feres- barred); Monaco v. United States, 661 F.2d 129 (9th Cir.198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
49 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1806, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,056, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,354 Donald Johnston Lola Lovina Johnston v. Captain R.B. Horne, Commander Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton Metal Trades Council, a Labor Organization John Doe, Supervisor, and His Marital Community International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 282, a Labor Organization, No. 86-3956
See, e.g., Laningham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1242 (D.C.Cir.1987) (intentional or willful means "so 'patently egregious and unlawful' that anyone undertaking the conduct should have known it 'unlawful' ") (quoting Wisdom v. Department of Housing & Urban Dev., 713 F.2d 422 , 425 (8th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984); Albright, 732 F.2d at 189 (willful or intentional requirement met "by committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or by flagrantly disregarding others' rights under the Act."); Moskiewicz, 791 F.2d a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnston v. Horne
See, e.g., Laningham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1242 (D.C.Cir.1987) (intentional or willful means “so ‘patently egregious and unlawful’ that anyone undertaking the conduct should have known it ‘unlawful’ ”) (quoting Wisdom v. Department of Housing & Urban Dev., 713 F.2d 422 , 425 (8th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984); Albright, 732 F.2d at 189 (willful or intentional requirement met “by committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or by flagrantly disregarding others’ rights under the Act.”); Mosk…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Veterans Administration of the United States
See, e.g., Laning- ham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1242 (D.C.Cir.1987) (intentional or willful means “so ‘patently egregious and unlawful’ that anyone undertaking the conduct should have known it ‘unlawful’ ”) (quoting Wisdom v. Dept. of Hous. & Urban Dev., 713 F.2d 422 , 425 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984)); Albright, 732 F.2d at 189 (willful or intentional requirement met “by committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or by flagrantly disregarding others’ rights under the Act.”); Moskiewic…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Veterans Administration of United States
See, e.g., Laningham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1242 (D.C.Cir.1987) (intentional or willful means "so 'patently egregious and unlawful' that anyone undertaking the conduct should have known it 'unlawful' ") (quoting Wisdom v. Dept. of Hous. & Urban Dev., 713 F.2d 422 , 425 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984)); Albright, 732 F.2d at 189 (willful or intentional requirement met "by committing the act without grounds for believing it to be lawful, or by flagrantly disregarding others' rights under the Act."); Moskiewicz, 791 F.2d at 564 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Del Rio v. United States
See, e.g., Mondelli v. United States, 711 F.2d 567 (3rd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); Lombard v. United States, 690 F.2d 215 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3086 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983); Monaco v. United States, 661 F.2d 129 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 ; In re Agent Orange Prod.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Del Rio v. United States
See, e.g., Mondelli v. United States, 711 F.2d 567 (3rd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984); Lombard v. United States, 690 F.2d 215 (D.C.Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3086 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983); Monaco v. United States, 661 F.2d 129 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989 , 102 S.Ct. 2269 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 ; In re Agent Orange Prod.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kerr-Mcgee Chemical Corporation v. Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Defendant
These are insufficient modes of participation to render applicable the doctrine of res judicata.”) (citation omitted); see also Adams v. Bell, 711 F.2d 161 , 197 n. 128 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984); Munoz v. Imperial County, 667 F.2d 811, 816 (9th Cir.) (“the filing of an amicus brief has never been enough to bind a non-party to the results of a proceeding”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 58 , 74 L.Ed.2d 62 (1982); 1B Moore 110.411[6], at 456-57.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Wilco Marsh Buggies & Draglines, Inc.
No. 83-760.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.