Jackson, Individually, & as Adm'r of the Est. of Jackson, Et Al. v. City of Joliet Et Al., 465 U.S. 1049 (1984). · Go Syfert
Jackson, Individually, & as Adm'r of the Est. of Jackson, Et Al. v. City of Joliet Et Al., 465 U.S. 1049 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
169 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pinder v. Johnson (ca4, 1995-05-30) · Strongest negative: Kolpak v. Bell (ilnd, 1985-08-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Kolpak v. Bell (2×)
N.D. Ill. · 1985 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200,1202 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984) (dictum that intentional deprivation of life by a state official would deprive plaintiffs’ decedents of their lives without due process of law).
discussed Cited "see" Pinder v. Johnson (2×)
4th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Pinder v. Johnson (2×)
4th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Harold S. Alston v. Walter Redman, Warden Charles M. Oberly, Iii, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and the State of Delaware (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203-04 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984); David P. Currie, Positive and Negative Constitutional Rights, 53 U.Chi.L.Rev. 864 (1986).
cited Cited "see" Alston v. Redman, Wdn.
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203-04 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 (1984); David P. Currie, Positive and Negative Constitutional Rights, 53 U. Chi.
discussed Cited "see" Rogers v. City of Port Huron (2×)
E.D. Mich. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203-04 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984) ("the concept of liberty in the Fourth Amendment does not include a right to basic services, whether competently provided or otherwise.”). 4 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dorwin Aam
9th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of Tacoma, 717 F.2d 1251, 1258 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984); Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Trans-Canada Enters, Ltd., 713 F.2d 455 , 457 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Aam
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of Tacoma, 717 F.2d 1251, 1258 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984); Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Trans-Canada Enters, Ltd., 713 F.2d 455 , 457 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.
N.D. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Port of Tacoma, 525 F.Supp. 65, 77 (Wash.1981), aff’d, 717 F.2d 1251, 1263 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984) (Corps of Engineers dredged new channel); Peterson v. Morton, 465 F.Supp. 986, 1003 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see" Griffin High School v. Illinois High School Association (2×)
7th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
E.g., United States Dep’t of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528, 534 , 93 S.Ct. 2821, 2825 , 37 L.Ed.2d 782 (1973) (A statute excluding household groups that included unrelated persons from the federal food stamp program violated the Equal Protection Clause, because it was motivated solely by a “bare congressional desire to harm a politically unpopular group.”); see Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200 , 1203 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984) (Discriminating against a class of persons in a “vicious or irrational fashion” gives r…
discussed Cited "see" Katherine B. Nichols, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Amelia Huston Nichols No. 593, Deceased v. Don Rysavy, Margaret Rysavy, Raymond Demers, Leo Novotny, Raymont Demers, Geraldine Demers, Doris Rysavy, Estates of W. & A. Rysavy, J. Rysavy, James Rysavy, William Rysavy, Amelia Rysavy, the United States of America, Hon. Donald P. Hodel as United States Secretary of the Interior, Ken Smith as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Clover Potter, Individually and as the Special Administratrix of the Estate of James Wilde v. State of South Dakota, United States of America, Donald P. Hodel as U.S. Secretary of the Interior, Ken Smith as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Gladys Ecoffey, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of John Yellow Bird v. Washabaugh County, United States of America, Donald P. Hodel as U.S. Secretary of the Interior, Ken Smith as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Chicago Title Insurance Company, First American Title Insurance Company, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Safeco Title Insurance Company of Idaho, Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Ticor Title Insurance Company, Title Insurance Company of Minnesota, Transamerica Title Insurance Company, Uslife Title Insurance Company of America, Amici Curiae for Rosemond Goins, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Ida Huston Roubideaux v. Nick Assman, Edwin Assman, W.O. Assman, William Assman, Isabelle Assman, Dorothy Assman, Donald Assman, Clarence Assman, Sadie Assman, Joe Assman, Esther Assman, Assman Realty, the United States of America, Honorable James Watt, as United States Secretary of the Interior Ken Smith, as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Lois Emery Fallis, Individually and on Behalf of the Heirs, Devisees, Benefactors and Assigns of Robert Emery, Deceased v. G.W. Holmes and Delores Holmes, United States of America, Honorable William Horn, United States Secretary of the Interior and Ross Swimmer, as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Shirley Lee Bordeaux, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Clara Hudson, No. 3196, Deceased v. Mary Ann Hunt, Estate of Lyle T. Hunt Alvina Woockmann, the United States of America: Honorable Donald Hodel, as United States Secretary of the Interior Ken Smith, as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Mary Pritzkau, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Narcisse Rich, Allotment No. 1163, Deceased v. Cottonwood Ranch & Livestock Co., Charles Steen, Vera Steen, Louis Buduhl, Chester Buduhl, the United States of America, Honorable Donald Hodel, as Secretary of the Interior Ken Smith, Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Tri-County Water Association, Mary H. Pritzkau, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Julia Narcelle v. Helen Larson, Estate of Clifford Larson Ziebach County, the United States of America, Honorable Donald Hodel, as United States Secretary of the Interior and Ken Smith, Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Elsie Bonser, Individually and as Estate Administratrix of the Estate of Mattie J. Bonser, No. 142 1/2, Deceased v. Ruth Shelbourn Julius Wahl Dorothy Wahl Todd County Independent School District Joseph Shelbourn Floyd Reagle Ethelena Reagle the United States of America Honorable Donald Hodel, as United States Secretary of the Interior and Ken Smith, as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Anna Rose Lapointe, Individually, and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Lena Lima Bourdeaux v. C. & M. McCormick Mary Abdellah Charles McCormick Will Maggrett United States of America Honorable Donald Hodel, as United States Secretary of the Interior and Ken Smith, as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Duane R. Sanovia, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of James Sanovia, Deceased v. Leslie Handcock, Thelma Handcock, Mae Handcock, Estate of M.D. Handcock, United States of America Donald Hodel, Secretary of the Interior Ken Smith, Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Mary Louise Bordeaux, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Clementine Hudson v. Henry Horn, Marion Horn, Elmer Horn, Estate of A. Horn, Anna Horn, United States of America Honorable Donald Hodel, as Secretary of the Interior Ken Smith, Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Marceline Hastings, Individually, and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Frank McCloskey Deceased v. Platte Valley and Investment Co. Earl Hollenbeck Vincent Hollenbeck v. Hollenbeck the United States of America Honorable Donald Hodel, as United States Secretary of the Interior and Ken Smith, as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Marceline Hastings, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Mary Pure Blacksmith, Deceased v. Frank Massa, Esther Massa, Guisto Massa, Maria Massa, Charlotte Abrams, A/K/A C. Cherniak the United States of America Honorable Donald Hodel, as Secretary of the Interior Ken Smith, as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs
1st Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of Tacoma, 717 F.2d 1251 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984). 104 In deciding this issue, we are guided by the Supreme Court's decision in Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102, 109-11 , 88 S.Ct. 733, 737-39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 936 (1968).
discussed Cited "see" Thompson v. Lancaster (2×)
M.D. Ga. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203-04 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Nichols v. Rysavy
8th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of Tacoma, 717 F.2d 1251 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" State of California, Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. United States of America, Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior, Sierra Club, Intervenors (2×)
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of Tacoma, 717 F.2d 1251 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984); United States v. Aranson, 696 F.2d 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 982 , 104 S.Ct. 423 , 78 L.Ed.2d 358 (1983); United States v. Harvey, 661 F.2d 767 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 833 , 103 S.Ct. 74 , 74 L.Ed.2d 72 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Bailey v. State of Ill. (2×)
N.D. Ill. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1204 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984) (dictum stating that jailers may be liable for deliberate indifference in condoning prisoner assaults under § 1983).
cited Cited "see" Melvin Donald Murphy v. Robert Gibson
6th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1204 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, ---- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1325 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" James Thibodeaux v. James Bordelon, Linda Brown
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. City of Joliet, 1984, — U.S. ---, 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (White, J., dissenting from the denial of certiorari); Haygood v. Younger, 9 Cir.1983, 718 F.2d 1472, 1479 (summarizing cases), reh’g en banc granted, Mar. 28, 1984; Juncker v. Tinney, D.Md.1982, 549 F.Supp. 574, 576 (summarizing cases).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jaffe v. City and County of Denver
Colo. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Collins v. City of Harker Heights, supra; Henderson v. Gunther, supro; see also Jackson v. City of Joliet, TIS F.2d 1200 (7th Cir.1983) (attempt by state officers to assist at an accident that was unsuccessful because of their negligence and resulted in death of accident victim was not a deprivation of life without due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 18325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984), Estate of Morgan v. Mayor & City Council of Hampton, Virginia, 986 F.Supp. 348 (E.D.Va.1996) (city had no duty under the due process clause to provide adequ…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Van Loo v. Braun (2×)
E.D. Wis. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1202 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984) (holding that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment seeks “to protect Americans from oppression by state government, not to secure them basic governmental services”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n (2×)
S.D. Ind. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
E.g., U.S. Dep’t. of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528, 534 , 93 S.Ct. 2821, 2825-26 , 37 L.Ed.2d 782 (1973) (A statute excluding household groups that included unrelated persons from the federal food stamp program violated the Equal Protection Clause, because it was motivated solely by a “bare congressional desire to harm a politically unpopular group.”); see also Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203 (7th Cir.1983), *793 cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984) (Discriminating against a class of persons in a “vicious and irrational fashion” gi…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Cannon (2×)
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1202 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McLaughlin v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Speculation about the occurrence of a future event ordinarily does not render all parties potentially affected by that future event necessary or indispensable parties under Rule 19.” Northrup Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 705 F.2d 1030, 1046 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 849 , 104 S.Ct. 156 , 78 L.Ed.2d 144 (1983); see also Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Port of Tacoma, 717 F.2d 1251 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." No. 87-3902
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Speculation about the occurrence of a future event ordinarily does not render all parties potentially affected by that future event necessary or indispensable parties under Rule 19." Northrup Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 705 F.2d 1030, 1046 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 849 , 104 S.Ct. 156 , 78 L.Ed.2d 144 (1983); see also Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Port of Tacoma, 717 F.2d 1251 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1324 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984). 10 In this case if there had been a contribution of funds by the District Lodge to support the campaigns of the loc…
examined Cited "see, e.g." Alexander Patton v. Raymond Przybylski (4×)
7th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200 , 1203-06 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Estate of Patricia E. Gilmore, Joseph P. Gilmore v. John J. Buckley (2×)
1st Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1204-05 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Jackson v. Byrne
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984); Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir.1982).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Jackson v. Byrne
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jackson v. City of Joliet, 715 F.2d 1200, 1203 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1325 , 79 L.Ed.2d 720 (1984); Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James R. Jackson, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Sandra A. Jackson
v.
City of Joliet
83-853.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1984.
465 U.S. 1049
Rehnquist.
Cited by 73 opinions  |  Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice WHITE, with whom Justice REHNQUIST joins, dissenting.

Lead Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Dissent

Justice White,

with whom Justice Rehnquist joins,

dissenting.

Petitioners, representatives of the estates of individuals killed in a one-car accident in Joliet, Ill., filed complaints in Federal Dis[*1050] trict Court under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 (1976 ed., Supp. V), contending that various county and city officials violated decedents’ constitutional rights by failing to save decedents from the burning automobile. In their complaint, petitioners alleged that two minutes after the car swerved off the road and burst into flames, one of the respondents, a police officer, arrived on the scene and began directing traffic around the car. Firemen were summoned, and the fire was extinguished; yet no efforts were made to remove decedents from the car, nor was an ambulance called until some 45 minutes after the accident occurred. The complaint alleged that decedents were still alive when the fire was doused and that had adequate rescue measures been taken at the outset, decedents would have survived.

The District Court denied respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaints for failure to state a cause of action. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, however, reversed, concluding that an attempt by state officers to assist at an accident does not result in the deprivation of a constitutional right when the attempt fails because of the negligence or gross negligence of the officers. 715 F. 2d 1200 (1983).

In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals noted that “[n]o problem so perplexes the federal courts today as determining the outer bounds of section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U. S. C. §1983 . . . .” Id., at 1201. Section 1983 actions have been brought in a variety of contexts by those injured as a result of a state official’s failure to exercise adequate care in carrying out his duties. Clark v. Taylor, 710 F. 2d 4 (CA1 1983); Morrison v. Washington County, 700 F. 2d 678 (CA11), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 864 (1983); Hull v. Duncanville, 678 F. 2d 582 (CA5 1982); Hirst v. Gertzen, 676 F. 2d 1252 (CA9 1982); Doe v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 649 F. 2d 134 (CA2 1981), after remand to District Court, 709 F. 2d 782 (CA2 1982), cert. denied sub nom. Catholic Home Bureau v. Doe, 464 U. S. 864 (1983). The results in these cases have not been entirely consistent. While the Court of Appeals in the present case determined that the State’s failure to provide adequate rescue services was not actionable under § 1983, other courts have permitted relief under that section when a foster parent’s abuse of his foster child was permitted by the state agency’s failure adequately to monitor the foster care environment, Doe v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, supra, and when a patient’s death was allegedly caused by the manner in which he was discharged by a state hospital, Morrison, [*1051] swpra. The inconsistent results below are attributable, at least in part, to the lack of definitive guidelines for determining when tor-tious conduct by state officials rises to the level of a constitutional tort. This Court should attempt to resolve this “perplexing” issue, and this case provides us with an opportunity to do so. Accordingly, I would grant the petition for certiorari and set the case for oral argument.