green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
11.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…uveniles ... who have not been convicted of crimes, have a due process interest in freedom from unnecessary bodily restraint which entitles them to closer scrutiny of their conditions of confinement than that accorded convicted criminals.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
James L. Devine v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South Dakota
See Klein v. Harris, 667 F.2d 274, 291 (2nd Cir.1981); but see U.S. v. Crowder, 719 F.2d 166, 172-13 (6th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984); Harry-man v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870, 876 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Opinion No.
uveniles . . . who have not been convicted of crimes, have a due process interest in freedom from unnecessary bodily restraint which entitles them to closer scrutiny of their conditions of confinement than that accorded convicted criminals.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Torres v. Commissioner of Correction
courts that have examined the confinement of adults in prison isolation cells have been reluctant to find them unconstitutional, based either on the length of confinement or on the possibility that isolation might cause psychiatric deterioration
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
A.J., by His Mother and Next Friend, L.B., on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. David Kierst, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Juvenile Officer Jim Morrison, in His Official Capacity as Director of Residential Services Sherman Williams, in His Official Capacity as Director of Detention Judge Edith L. Messina, in Her Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Officer of Juvenile Detention and as Judge of the Juvenile Division of the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri, (Two Cases)
uveniles ... who have not been convicted of crimes, have a due process interest in freedom from unnecessary bodily restraint which entitles them to closer scrutiny of their conditions of confinement than that accorded convicted criminals.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
A.J. ex rel. L.B. v. Kierst
uveniles ... who have not been convicted of crimes, have a due process interest in freedom from unnecessary bodily restraint which entitles them to closer scrutiny of their conditions of confinement than that accorded convicted criminals.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Wynnewood House Associates
(4×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
its purpose was to cover cases where an expenditure of the estate's funds increases the value of the collateral
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hunnewell v. Warden, Maine
Santana v. Collazo, 714 F.2d 1172, 1182 (1st Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 18 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slaughter v. Parker
See United States v. Crowder, 719 F.2d 166, 171-172 (6th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984); Hockenbury v. Sowders, 718 F.2d 155, 156-159 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975 , 104 S.Ct. 2354 , 80 L.Ed.2d 826 (1984) (discussing Anderson in the context of habeas corpus proceedings).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander S. Ex Rel. Bowers v. Boyd
See generally Santana v. Collazo, 533 F.Supp. 966, 972 (D.P.R.1982) (discussing the development of the "right to treatment” theories, although eventually rejecting them), aff'd, 714 F.2d 1172 (1st Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Wheaton Oaks Office Partners Limited Partnership, Debtor-Appellant
See Wolters Village, Ltd. v. Village Prop., Ltd., 723 F.2d 441 , 443 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2350 , 80 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bates
See State v. Kindem, 338 N.W.2d 9, 17-18 (Minn.1983) (citing planning as an aggravating factor), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984); Minn.Sent.Guidelines II.
cited
Cited "see"
Lowe v. Sheinfeld, Malley & Kay, P.C. (In Re Saunders)
See Matter of Village Properties, 723 F.2d 441, 444 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2350 , 80 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Petrich
See State v. Kindem, 338 N.W.2d 9, 16-17 (Minn.1983), cert denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bock
See State v. Kindem, 338 N.W.2d 9, 17 (Minn.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984) (“immense amount of planning to determine when the victim would be most vulnerable” considered an aggravating factor warranting departure).
cited
Cited "see"
Valeriano v. Meachum
See State v. Valeriano, 191 Conn. 659 , 468 A.2d 936 (1983), cert. denied, Valeriano v. Connecticut, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2351 , 80 L.Ed.2d 824 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Wright v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland (In re North American Oil & Gas Co.)
See Matter of Village Properties, Ltd., 723 F.2d 441, 446 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2350 , 80 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984) (noting that forum shopping is discouraged); see generally In Re Burley, 738 F.2d at 981; Orthmann, 765 F.2d at 121 . .
cited
Cited "see"
DeFranco v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. (In Re DeFranco)
See In re Village Properties, Ltd., 723 F.2d 441 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2350 , 80 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Valeriano v. Bronson
See State v. Valeriano, 191 Conn. 659, 661 , 468 A.2d 936 (1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S. Ct. 2351 , 80 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lazaro Mora, United States of America v. Jose Duarte, United States of America v. Ruben Forcade, United States of America v. Carlos Amador
See United States v. Primrose, 718 F.2d 1484, 1491-92 (10th Cir.1983) (defendant's prior acts admissible to establish foundation for conspiracy), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984); United States v. Ricardo, 619 F.2d 1124, 1131 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1063 , 101 S.Ct. 789 , 66 L.Ed.2d 607 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mora
See United States v. Primrose, 718 F.2d 1484, 1491-92 (10th Cir.1983) (defendant’s prior acts admissible to establish foundation for conspiracy), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984); United States v. Ricardo, 619 F.2d 1124, 1131 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1063 , 101 S.Ct. 789 , 66 L.Ed.2d 607 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Bucci, Sr. And Ronald H. Glantz
See United States v. Boston, 718 F.2d 1511, 1516-17 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Leecan
See State v. Valeriano, 191 Conn. 659, 664 , 468 A.2d 936 (1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S. Ct. 2351 , 80 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dupree
See State v. Valeriano, 191 Conn. 659, 662 , 468 A.2d 936 (1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S. Ct. 2351 , 80 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hinton
See, e.g., State v. Valeriano, 191 Conn. 659, 662 , 468 A.2d 936 (1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S. Ct. 2351 , 80 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dodson v. Reno
Id.; see also Santana v. Collazo, 714 F.2d 1172, 1179 (1st Cir.1983) (“courts that have examined the confinement of adults in prison isolation cells have been reluctant to find them unconstitutional, based either on the length of confinement or on the possibility that isolation might cause psychiatric deterioration.”), cer t. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Chester Vernon Zeigler, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
The Act outlaws such interference ‘in any way or degree.’ ” Id. at 215 , 80 S.Ct. at 272 (citing 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (a)); see also United States v. Culbert, 435 U.S. 371, 373 , 98 S.Ct. 1112, 1113 , 55 L.Ed.2d 349 (1978) (rejecting any limitation of the Hobbs Act to “racketeering” only and concluding that words used by Congress in the Act “do not lend themselves to restrictive interpretation.”) , 1 A. Effectr-Onr-Commerce Requirement In accordance with the plain language of the statute, this court has held that the jurisdictional predicate of the Hobbs Act can be satisfied by a sh…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bobby Sizemore and Larry Sizemore
See also Smith v. Cadagan, 902 F.2d 553 , 557 n. 4 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 865 (1990) ("The Sixth Circuit similarly has made it clear--albeit in a somewhat different situation--that concern with the exploitation of silence is the factor that must govern our application of Doyle.") (citing United States v. Crowder, 719 F.2d 166 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Bering Trader, Inc.
See In re Transportation Design & Technology, 48 B.R. 635, 640 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.1985); see also Matter of Village Properties, 723 F.2d 441 , 444 (5th Cir.) (section 552 was intended to apply in cases where value of collateral is increased), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2350 , 80 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Philip Morris Capital Corp. v. Bering Trader, Inc. (In re Bering Trader, Inc.)
See In re Transportation Design & Technology, 48 B.R. 635, 640 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.1985); see also Matter of Village Properties, 723 F.2d 441 , 444 (5th Cir.) (section 552 was intended to apply in cases where value of collateral is increased), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2350 , 80 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Executive House Associates
See, e.g., In re Village Properties, Ltd., 723 F.2d 441, 443 (5th Cir.1984), cert denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2350 , 80 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984); In re Jones, 77 B.R. 981, 983 (Bankr.M.D.Ga.1987); In re Jenkins, 13 B.R. 721, 723 (Bankr.D.Colo.1981), rev’d on other grounds, 19 B.R. 105 (D.C.Colo.1982). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Anthony Rivera
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Boston, 718 F.2d 1511, 1515 (10th Cir.1983), cert. den. 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S.Ct. 2352 , 80 L.Ed.2d 825 , rehearing den. 467 U.S. 1268 , 104 S.Ct. 3563 , 82 L.Ed.2d 864 [in indictment for violation of the Hobbs Act, in which interference with commerce is an essential element, it is not necessary for the indictment to allege the exact nature of the interference with commerce].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hernandez
Arson murder has no mens rea requirement beyond that of an intention to commit the underlying crime of arson upon which the charge of arson murder is predicated.” Id.; see also State v. Valeriano, 191 Conn. 659, 662 , 468 A.2d 936 (1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 974 , 104 S. Ct. 2351 , 80 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wolters Village, Ltd.
v.
Village Properties, Ltd.
v.
Village Properties, Ltd.
No. 83-1585.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1984.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.