green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476,477 (4th Cir. 1983) cert. denied, sub nom., 469 U.S. 837 (1984); United States v. Grammatikos, 633 F.2d 1013 (2nd Cir. 1980), or its equivalent, see United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120,1125 (4th Cir. 1986) (“government’s ‘open file’ policy . . . gave [defendant] adequate notice in the same manner as a bill of particulars would have provided”) cert. denied, 49 U.S. 930 (1986); See United State v. DeFries, 129 F.3d 1293,1315 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
(2×)
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476,477 (4th Cir. 1983) cert. denied, sub nom., 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Grammatikos, 633 F.2d 1013 (2nd Cir. 1980), or its equivalent, see United States v. Amend, 791 F.2d 1120,1125 (4th Cir. 1986) ("government's 'open file' policy . . . gave [defendant] adequate notice in the same manner as a bill of particulars would have provided") cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 , 107 S.Ct. 399 , 93 L.Ed.2d 353 (1986); See United State v. DeFries, 129 F.3d 1293,1315 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Pedini v. Bowles
See In re Russell, 726 F.2d 1007, 1011 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sartin
Id.; see United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 474-75 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 (1984). 3 See WIS JI-CRIMINAL 6000, Note on the Knowledge Requirement in Controlled Substance Cases, at 2-3 (1981). 4 See Wis. Stat. § 161.14 (4)(t) (1993-94). 5 See Wis. Stat. § 161.16 (2)(b)l (1993-94). 6 Although the facts as presented are sparse, the defendant apparently claimed that he thought that the substance which he possessed was another controlled substance, possibly marijuana. 7 Dicta is a statement or language expressed in a court's opinion which extends beyond the facts in the …
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steaven Martin BASINGER, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 476 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas C. Hill
(2×)
See United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 476 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); cf. United States v. Batts, 558 F.2d 513, 516 (9th Cir.1977) (upholding the use of illegally obtained evidence to show knowledge and intent without discussing bad faith of the police officers), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 859 , 99 S.Ct. 178 , 58 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Sherman Steward
See id. at 904 n. 8 (citing cases). 5 .Steward points to our decisions in United States v. Ramirez-Ramirez, 875 F.2d 772 (9th Cir.1989), and United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Mickens, Anthony Jacobs, Shelby Kearney, Bettina Jacobs Celifie, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Bein, 728 F.2d 107, 114 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 135 , 83 L.Ed.2d 75 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 , 93 S.Ct. 1602, 1608 , 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973); see Tiemens v. United States, 724 F.2d 928, 929 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) (“[A] guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects occurring prior to the time of the plea, including violations of the defendant’s rights to a speedy trial and due process.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McCoy
See United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 476 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Krumme v. West Point-Pepperell, Inc.
See United States v. Bein, 728 F.2d 107, 112 (2d Cir.1984) (in case involving federal fraud convictions, court stated that “there is no accountant-client privilege in this circuit”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 135 , 83 L.Ed.2d 75 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Levario, A/K/A George Levario
See United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 475 (9th Cir.) (to constitute a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a) it is only necessary to prove defendant knew he possessed a controlled substance even though he may be mistaken as to the specific type of substance), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Menelao Orlando Estevez, Appeal of Jose Guillermo Haro
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476, 477-478 (4th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (indictment notifying defendant of forfeiture of all property and profits from criminal conspiracy and identifying such property in statute’s language complied with Rule 7(c)(2) when bill of particulars described property in detail), certiorari denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Haro
See United States v. Raimondo,. 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1987
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984). 41 In other settings, statutes permitting enhanced penalties have established the prosecution's burden of proof as a preponderance of the evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandini
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramaria Familienstiftung v. United States
See United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476, 477 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, Bello v. United States, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nunez-Martinez
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 475 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 (1984); United States v. Jewell, 532 F.2d 697, 698 (9th Cir.) (a defendant who has knowledge that he possesses a controlled substance may have the state of mind necessary for conviction even if he does not know which controlled substance he possesses), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 951 (1976); People v. Romero, 55 Cal. App. 4th 147 , 64 Cal. Rptr. 2d 16, 23 (1997) (even if defendant thought he was dealing only in marijuana, he had the requisite knowledge to be convicted of possession, sale, and transp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twohig v. Blackmer
The Tenth Circuit concluded that such statements made “while [the] criminal trial was pending [were] not compatible with the concept of a fair trial.” Id. (emphasis added); see also In re Russell, 726 F.2d 1007, 1010 (4th Cir.) (upholding trial court order prohibiting potential witnesses in a criminal case from discussing their proposed testimony with members of the media because of “tremendous publicity[,] the potentially inflammatory and highly prejudicial statements ..., and the relative ineffectiveness of the considered alternatives” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cutler
Dow Jones, 842 F.2d at 610 (citations omitted); see also In re Russell, 726 F.2d 1007, 1010 (4th Cir.) (in upholding order restraining witnesses from discussing case with media, Court held that “the evidence considered by [the District Court judge] adequately supported his determination that there was a reasonable likelihood that the defendants would be denied a fair trial without proscribing certain of petitioners’ extrajudicial statements”), cer t. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); Hirschkop v. Snead, 594 F.2d 356, 370 (4th Cir.1979) (upholding virtually iden…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Varela
(2×)
Although intrasovereign involvement may be a factor when assessing the motivation of law enforcement officials, the fact of intrasovereign involvement does not provide, in and of itself, “a reliable predictor of deterrence.” Tirado, 689 F.2d at 313 ; see also United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 476 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); 4 LaFave, supra, § 11.6(c), at 501-02.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of ALJ
(2×)
Compare, for example, United States v. Lowery, 726 F.2d 474 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 73 (1984); Brisco v. United States, 368 F.2d 214 (3rd Cir.1966); and Cunningham v. United States, 256 F.2d 467 (5th Cir.1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Butler
“Congress did not intend that an individual be punished under both § 846 (conspiracy) and § 848 (continuing criminal enterprise).” United States v. Porter, 821 F.2d 968, 967 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1108 , 99 L.Ed.2d 269 (1988); See also United States v. Raimondo, 721 F.2d 476 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGee v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); United States v. Finucan, 708 F.2d 838 (1st Cir.1983); United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654 (5th Cir), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); People v. Drain, 73 N.Y.2d 107 , 538 N.Y.S.2d 500 , 535 N.E.2d 630 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People in Interest of MC
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lowery, 726 F.2d 474 (9th Cir.1983) (no equal protection violation when defendant received longer sentence under Youth Corrections Act than defendant could have received as adult), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 133 , 83 L.Ed.2d 73 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lowell Brown
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Martinez, 725 F.2d 471, 475 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984) (“[Defendant] was charged with importing and possessing a controlled substance, heroin, and the evidence established ... that he did so.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Simon
See Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 563-64 , 96 S.Ct. 2791, 2804-05 , 49 L.Ed.2d 683 (1976); Branzburg, 408 U.S. at 685 , 92 S.Ct. at 2658 ; see also In re Russell, 726 F.2d 1007, 1009-11 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 134 , 83 L.Ed.2d 74 (1984); In re Application of National *791 Broadcasting Company, Inc., 635 F.2d 945, 951 (2d Cir.1980); United States v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661, 666-67 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Castro v. Sullivan
See also United States v. Bein, 728 F.2d 107, 114-15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 135 , 83 L.Ed.2d 75 (1984); United States v. Cirillo, 468 F.2d 1233, 1240 (2d *752 Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 989 , 93 S.Ct. 1501 , 36 L.Ed.2d 188 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodolitz
See United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 345 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 618 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974) (citing Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339 , 78 S.Ct. 311 , 2 L.Ed.2d 321 (1958) (information obtained in violation of defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination); see also United States v. Bein, 728 F.2d 107, 113 (2d Cir.) (information obtained in violation of attorney-client privilege), ce rt. denied sub nom. 469 U.S. 837 , 105 S.Ct. 135 , 83 L.Ed.2d 75 (1984).
Lowery
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-6504.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.