green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
“he resolution of conflicting testimony is within the exclusive province of the trial court”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 44 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Steiner v. Bran Park Associates
he resolution of conflicting testimony is within the exclusive province of the trial court
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Lonique M.
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence in a juvenile delinquency proceeding, “the applicable standard is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the presentment agency, the quantity and quality of the evidence is sufficient to show that the essential elements of the crimes charged have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt” (Matter of Ashley M., 30 AD3d 178, 179 [2006]; see People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757 [1984], cert denied 469 US 932 [1984]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams v. New York State Education Department
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See New York State Nat’l Org. for Women v. Pataki, 261 F.3d 156 , 168 (2001), Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133, 1135 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
National Western Life Insurance v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 878 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cadlerock Properties Joint Venture, L.P. v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection
See Gaynor-Stafford Industries, Inc. v. Water Pollution Control Authority, 192 Conn. 638, 648 , 474 A.2d 752 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S. Ct. 328 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
\ BD\" v. DeBuono"
Id.; see also Gudema v. Nassau County, 163 F.3d 717, 724-25 (2d Cir.1998); accord Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133, 1134 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); Oberlander v. Perales, 740 F.2d 116, 120 (2d Cir.1984); (Where plaintiff “had the right to make written submissions on disputed issues of fact and law and had, following the deprivation, [Article 78 of the New York Practice Law and Rules] procedures available to compel a full-scale evi-dentiary hearing on its claims,” those procedures satisfy due process.); Irwin v. City of New York, 902 F.Supp. …
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. West
Even under the heightened standard applicable in circumstantial evidence cases (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 441 ), we conclude that, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 ), there is a “valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury * * * and as a matter of law satisfy the proof and burden requirements for every element of the crime [s] [of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree]” (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [citatio…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. West
Even under the heightened standard applicable in circumstantial evidence cases (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 441 ), we conclude that, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 ), there is a “valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury * * * and as a matter of law satisfy the proof and burden requirements for every element of the crime [s] [of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree]” (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [citatio…
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,497 John D. Marks v. Cdw Computer Centers, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, F/k/a Mpk Computing, Inc., and Michael P. Krasny
See Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 877 (9th Cir.1984), certiorari denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 ; Tornera, 511 F.2d at 510-511 .
cited
Cited "see"
Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.
See Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 (1967); International Rys. of Cent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Federico v. Board of Education of the Public Schools
Neighborhood Action Comm., 101 F.3d at 881; see Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); Interboro Inst., Inc. v. Foley, 985 F.2d 90 (2d Cir.1993); Katz v. Klehammer, 902 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.1990); Campo v. New York City Employees’ Retirement System, 843 F.2d 96, 103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 889 , 109 S.Ct. 220 , 102 L.Ed.2d 211 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federico v. BD. OF EDUC. OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Neighborhood Action Comm., 101 F.3d at 881; see Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); Interboro Inst., Inc. v. Foley, 985 F.2d 90 (2d Cir.1993); Katz v. Klehammer, 902 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.1990); Campo v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 843 F.2d 96, 103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 889 , 109 S.Ct. 220 , 102 L.Ed.2d 211 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
ca1 1996
See Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 876 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.
See Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 876 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey Litt
(2×)
See Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133 (2d Cir.) (finding that an Article 78 proceeding satisfied the due process requirement of providing a hearing at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984). 17 The Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection is "a right to be free from invidious discrimination in statutory classifications and other governmental activity." Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 322 , 100 S.Ct. 2671, 2691 , 65 L.Ed.2d 784 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
John Schleck and Robert Kraft v. Ramsey County, Suzanne Alliegro, Michael Moriarity and Kathleen Mahoney
See Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133, 1135 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Armington v. School Dist. of Philadelphia
See Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133, 1136 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984) (school district is a state actor for § 1983 purposes). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Castro v. New York City Board of Education
See Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133, 1135 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Bryan
See Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); IIT v. Cornfeld, 619 F.2d 909, 931 (2d Cir.1980); International Rys. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Bruce A. Bryan
See Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); IIT v. Cornfeld, 619 F.2d 909, 931 (2d Cir.1980); International Rys. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strong v. Board Of Ed. Of Uniondale Ufsd
See Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133, 1135 (2d Cir.) ("[i]f there is no factual dispute between the employer and the employee, a hearing is meaningless"), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); see also Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. at 335 , 96 S.Ct. at 903 (the probable value, if any, of additional procedural safeguard is one important consideration). 19 Moreover, as we have noted, adequate "post-deprivation" procedures are available to protect Strong's property interest in her tenured teaching position.
discussed
Cited "see"
Strong v. Board of Education
See Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133, 1135 (2d Cir.) (“[i]f there is no factual dispute between the employer and the employee, a hearing is meaningless”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); see also Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. at 335 , 96 S.Ct. at 903 (the probable value, if any, of additional procedural safeguard is one important consideration).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Hathaway
"On an appeal from a verdict of guilty, the evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the People and it must be presumed that the jury credited the People’s witnesses” (People v Lyng, 154 AD2d 787, 789 ; see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757 , cert denied 469 US 932 ; People v Scallero, 122 AD2d 350 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reinhardt v. COM. OF MASS. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV.
See Campo v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 843 F.2d 96, 101 (2d Cir.) ("`[S]o long as appellant had a reasonable time in which to seek Article 78 relief, he cannot make a legitimate claim of due process violation because his claim now may be barred.'" (quoting Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133 , 1135 n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984))), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 220 , 102 L.Ed.2d 211 (1988); Surowitz v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 376 F.Supp. 369, 377 (S.D.N.Y.1974) ("[W]here it is plaintiff's own election which…
discussed
Cited "see"
Reinhardt v. Massachusetts Department of Social Services
See Campo v. New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 843 F.2d 96, 101 (2d Cir.) (“ ‘[S]o long as appellant had a reasonable time in which to seek Article 78 relief, he cannot make a legitimate claim of due process violation because his claim now may be barred.’ ” (quoting Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133 , 1135 n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984))), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 220 , 102 L.Ed.2d 211 (1988); Surowitz v. New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 376 F.Supp. 369, 377 (S.D.N.Y.1974) (“[W]here it is plaintiff’s ow…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Carrasquillo
(People v Montanez, 41 NY2d 53 , 57; see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757 , cert denied 469 US 932 ; People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 203 .) The critical inquiry in any such assessment is whether, viewing the evidence in such light, any rational trier of the facts could have found that the defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "see"
Acri v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
See Impro Products v. Block, 722 F.2d 845, 850-51 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 264 (1984); Baron v. United Artists Pictures Corp., 717 F.2d 105 , 108 (3d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
George T. Acri v. International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
See Impro Products v. Block, 722 F.2d 845, 850-51 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 327 , 83 L.Ed.2d 264 (1984); Baron v. United Artists Pictures Corp., 717 F.2d 105 , 108 (3d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sequoia Forestkeeper v. Tidwell
This position in Summers regarding standing, in addition to this NWF decision regarding ripeness, supports application of the following rule of accrual in the instant action: “A cause of action against an administrative agency ‘first accrues’ within the meaning of § 2401(a), as soon as (but not before) the person challenging the agency can institute and maintain a suit in court.” Spannaus v. United States, 824 F.2d 52, 56 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States, 386 U.S. 503, 510-11 , 87 S.Ct. 1177 , 18 L.Ed.2d 256 (1967)); see also, Impro Prods., Inc. v. Block, 7…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Paine
See also Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 879 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); and Resolution Trust Corp. v. Fleischer, 826 F.Supp. 1273, 1276 (D.Kan.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anonymous v. Peters
(See, Matter of Lee TT. v Dowling, supra; Matter of Nils TT. v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 221 AD2d 874 [3d Dept 1995], lv denied 87 NY2d 812 [1996]; Kenneth VV. v Wing, 235 AD2d 1007 [1997]; see also, Giglio v Dunn, 732 F2d 1133 [2d Cir], cert denied 469 US 932 [1984]; Barry v Barchi, 443 US 55 [1979]; Marold v Fendetti, supra; Watso v Colorado Dept. of Social Servs., supra.) The statutory scheme under Social Services Law § 422 satisfies this standard.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Smith
See also Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); Adams v. Clarke, 22 F.2d 957 (9th Cir.1927); Cf. Schilling v. Parman, 35 F.2d 780, 781 (D.Or.1928) (holding that the statute of limitations does not begin to run on claims against the former directors of a failed national bank until the former directors of the bank no longer controlled the bank).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Segerson v. Cons. Comm. of the Town of Redding, No. 31 61 00 (Jan. 24, 1995)
"The decision as to whether a particular interest is sufficient to disqualify . . . is necessarily a factual one and depends upon the circumstances of the particular case." Cioffoletti v. Planning Zoning Commission, 209 Conn. 544 , 554 , 552 A.2d 796 (1989); Keiser v. Redding Conservation Commission, Superior Court, Judicial District of Danbury, Docket No. 31 42 06 July 11, 1994, Riefberg, J.) (discussing commission member David Pattee's alleged conflict of interest as Chairman of the Conservation Commission and a member of the Redding Water Pollution Control Commission (WPCC)); see also Gayno…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Farmer
Am. v. United Fruit Co., 373 F.2d 408, 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 2031 , 18 L.Ed.2d 975 (1967)); see also Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 879 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hecht, 833 F.Supp. 529, 533 (D.Md.1993); 13 Resolution Trust Corp. v. Fleischer, 826 F.Supp. 1273, 1276 (D.Kan.1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Park City Mines Co. v. Greater Park City Co.
See, e.g., Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 876-79 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984); IIT & Int’l Inv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Limpert
Viewing the evidence, as we must, in a light most favorable to the People, we conclude that it was sufficient to provide a valid line of reasoning to sustain the court’s verdict (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 ; see also, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757 , cert denied 469 US 932 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Huang v. Sentinel Government Securities
See also Mosesian v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 727 F.2d 873, 877 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 329 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984) (when claim should have been discovered may be determined as a matter of law only when “uncontroverted evidence irrefutably demonstrates when plaintiff discovered or should have discovered the fraudulent conduct.”) Given the above, the various statutes of limitation periods cannot be said to have commenced, as a matter of law, prior to the criminal indictment becoming public in late 1983.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Courtemanche v. Enlarged City School District
Compare Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1493 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (holding that “root requirement” of due process generally dictates hearing prior to termination of employment) with Giglio v. Dunn, 732 F.2d 1133, 1134-35 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 265 (1984), cited with approval in Campo v. New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 843 F.2d 96, 102 (2d Cir.1988) (denying teacher’s section 1983 claim, based on his allegedly coerced resignation, since availability of Article 78 hearing under New York law…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re N.D.N.Y. Grand Jury Subpoena 86-0351-S. United States of America v. A Grand Jury Witness
(2×)
We likewise rejected a claim in Davis that the directive itself had testimonial aspects because the district court’s “order specifically provided that the Government could not use the directive as an admission that the bank accounts existed, that Davis had control over them, or for any other purpose.” Id. at 1040 ; see also United States v. Ghidoni, 732 F.2d 814, 818 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932 , 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 264 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Marsh
Viewed in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence in this case is sufficient to sustain the conviction, inasmuch as rr 'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime[s] beyond a reasonable doubt’ ” (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 ; quoting from Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307, 319 ; see also, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757 , cert denied 469 US 932 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Gibbs
The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, since the " 'trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt’ ” (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 , quoting from Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307, 319 ; People v Herriot, 110 AD2d 851, 852 ; see also, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757 , cert denied 469 US 932 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Berberena
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, as we must, we find that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict (see, Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307 ; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ; see also, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755 , cert denied 469 US 932 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Middleton
A " 'rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt’ ” (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 , quoting from Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307, 319 ; People v Herriot, 110 AD2d 851, 852 ; see also, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757 , cert denied 469 US 932 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George G. Davis
See, e.g., United States v. Ghidoni, 732 F.2d 814 (11th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 328 , 83 L.Ed.2d 264 (1984); United States v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 584 F.Supp. 1080 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Garpeg, Ltd. v. United States, 583 F.Supp. 789 (S.D.N.Y.1984).
Wolfson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-193.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.