green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wright v. Jewish Child Care Ass'n
indeed, the salutary purposes of summary judgment - avoiding protracted, expensive and harassing trials - apply no less to discrimination cases than to commercial or other areas of litigation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Crowe v. Leroy Central School District
to allow a party to defeat a motion for summary judgment by offering purely conclusory allegations of discrimination, absent any concrete particulars, would necessitate a trial in all cases
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Walder v. White Plains Board of Education
plaintiffs mere subjective belief she was discriminated against because of her race ... cannot sustain a charge of race discrimination.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kalekiristos v. CTS Hotel Management Corp.
to allow a party to defeat a motion for summary judgment by offering purely conelusory allegations of discrimination, absent any concrete particulars, would necessitate a trial in all title vii cases.
discussed
Cited "see"
Maresca v. City of New York
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985) (in order to survive a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff must offer “concrete particulars” to substantiate the claim.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hughson
See, Hugh-son’s Reply Memorandum, at pp. 2-3. “[T]he prospect of being indicted does not entitle a witness to commit perjury, and witnesses who are not grand jury targets are protected from compulsory self-incrimination to the same extent as those who are,” and “all of this is largely irrelevant, since we do not understand what constitutional disadvantage a failure to give potential defendant warnings could possibly inflict on a grand jury witness, whether or not he has received other warnings.” United States v. Washington, 431 U.S. 181, 189 , 97 S.Ct. 1814 , 52 L.Ed.2d 238 (1977); s…
cited
Cited "see"
Clarke v. One Source Facility Services, Inc.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Vargas v. Hill
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Flores v. Buy Buy Baby, Inc.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.1985) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Dawkins v. Witco Corp.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989 (2d Cir.1985) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Cooper v. Wyeth Ayerst Lederle
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989 (2d Cir.1985) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985), B.
cited
Cited "see"
Whidbee v. McDonald's Corp.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Barnett v. Revere Smelting & Refining Corp.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hines v. Hillside Children's Center
See Colon v. Coughlin, 58 F.3d 865, 872 (2d Cir.1995) (“a party may not rest on the bare allegations of a pleading to defeat a properly submitted motion for summary judg *323 ment”); accord Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Ransom v. Danzig
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald B. Pennington, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. John E. Oldner, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
See United States v. Hutchings, 751 F.2d 230, 237 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 75 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Pennington
See United States v. Hutchings, 751 F.2d 230, 237 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 75 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Malik v. Carrier Corp.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 995 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Antwane Carlisle v. City of Yonkers, Yonkers Police Department, Detective Lyons, and Detective Surlack
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. $8,880 in U.S. Currency
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985) (conclusory allegations of discrimination are insufficient to satisfy Rule 56(e)).
cited
Cited "see"
Orisek v. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989 , 995 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985); Arnell v. Pan American, 1986 WL 11455 , at *5 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Quintana v. Medical Research Associates, P.C.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacesetter Motors, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.) (“the summary judgment rule would be rendered sterile ... if the mere incantation of intent or state of mind would operate as a talisman to defeat an otherwise valid motion”), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Picotte v. Community Child Care Center of the Third Ward, Inc.
Although courts are generally reluctant to grant summary judgment in cases where motive, intent or state of mind are at issue, Dister v. Continental Group, Inc., 859 F.2d 1108, 1114 (2d Cir.1988) (where such is at issue summary judgment should be used sparingly); accord Montana v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Rochester, 869 F.2d 100, 103 (2d Cir.1989) (summary judgment is ordinarily inappropriate where intent is at issue), “the salutary purposes of summary judgment— avoiding protracted, expensive and harassing trials — apply no less to discrimination cases than to commer…
cited
Cited "see"
Gonzalez v. Long
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Graden James Miguel
See United States v. Keith, 754 F.2d 1388, 1393 (9th Cir.) (restitution ordered where "possible intervening cause ... is directly related to the assault”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 93 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985); United States v. Spinney, 795 F.2d 1410, 1417 (9th Cir.1986) ("a restitution order is authorized if the defendant created the circumstances under which the harm or loss occurred").
cited
Cited "see"
Celia Henry v. Daytop Village, Inc.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dean Harvey Hicks
“A federal court has no inherent power to order restitution.” United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1177 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990); accord United States v. Keith, 754 F.2d 1388, 1391 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 93 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985); United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1984 Lincoln Continental
See $215,300 U.S. Currency, 882 F.2d at 420 3 Miller contends that pursuant to United States v. Pacific Hide & Fur Depot, Inc., 768 F.2d 1096 (9th Cir.1985), and United States v. McAllister, 747 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 (1985), the government was required to show Miller was aware of "a high probability of the existence of the fact in question." This contention lacks merit.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alonso Gonzalez-Lopez
See United States v. McAllister, 747 F.2d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985); Van Brandy, 726 F.2d at 551 (incomplete FBI file).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Claimant-Appellee v. Leif D. Soderling, in Re Paul B. Andrew, C.P.M., Receiver. United States of America Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling, (Three Cases) United States of America v. Jay S. Soderling, (Four Cases) United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling
See United States v. Keith, 754 F.2d 1388, 1391-92 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 93 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985) 12 The VWPA does not require an order of restitution to be limited in duration.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Soderling
See United States v. Keith, 754 F.2d 1388, 1391-92 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 93 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Laurie Anne Tillman, Aka: Lori Ann Tillman Aka: Laurie Ann Tillman, United States of America v. Lawrence Warren Smith
We will reverse for nonconstitutional error "unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict." United States v. Cepeda, 851 F.2d 1564, 1567 (9th Cir.1988) (citations omitted); see United States v. McAllister, 747 F.2d 1273, 1277 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 (1985). 16 Even if we assume that the district court abused its discretion by limiting testimony by defense experts, we are bound to conclude that any such error is harmless.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry D. Smith
See United States v. Ahumada-Avalos, 875 F.2d 681, 684 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 837 , 110 S.Ct. 118 , 107 L.Ed.2d 79 (1989). 14 In analyzing the due process claim, "we consider the private and governmental interests at stake, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of the private interests through existing procedures, and the probable value of additional or substitute procedures." United States v. Keith, 754 F.2d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir.) (Keith), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 93 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis H. BILLET, Jr., Appellant, v. CIGNA CORPORATION; And Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985) (conclusory allegations of discrimination are insufficient to satisfy the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e)).
cited
Cited "see"
Carter v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry K. Hiland, United States of America v. Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc., Now Known as Retrac, Inc., United States of America v. Ronald M. Carter, Sr.
See United States v. Martin, 815 F.2d 818, 824 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 825 , 108 S.Ct. 89 , 98 L.Ed.2d 51 (1987). 53 Even if adequately worded, "[a] conscious avoidance instruction is 'properly given only when the defendant claims a lack of guilty knowledge and there are facts [in] evidence that support an inference of deliberate ignorance.' " United States v. White, 794 F.2d 367, 371 (8th Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. McAllister, 747 F.2d 1273, 1275 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985)).
cited
Cited "see"
Long v. AT & T Information Systems Inc.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John A. Kroh, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Hutchings, 751 F.2d 230, 237 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 75 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mastrangelo v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989 , 996 n. 10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985) (noting “de min-imis nature of a plaintiffs burden of proof at the prima facie stage.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Corcoran v. GAB Business Services, Inc.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 995 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Leberman v. John Blair & Company
Sav. and Loan Ass’n, 869 F.2d 100, 103 (2d Cir.1989); see Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985); Patrick v. LeFevre, 745 F.2d 153, 159 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hatfield
(2×)
See United States v. Hutchings, 751 F.2d 230 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 75 (1985); United States v. Tillman, 470 F.2d 142 (3rd Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 968 , 93 S.Ct. 1451 , 35 L.Ed.2d 702 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Keeley v. Citibank, N.A.
See Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 997-998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eleanor H. Montana v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Rochester
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 997-98 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harriet Ramseur v. Chase Manhattan Bank
Thomas, Inc., 831 F.2d 1184, 1188 (2d Cir.1987); see Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989 , 995 (2d Cir.) (religious discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , — S.Ct. -, — L.Ed.2d — (1985); cf. Pena v. Brattleboro Retreat, 702 F.2d 322, 324 (2d Cir.1983) (age discrimination claim under 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1976, Supp.
cited
Cited "see"
Childers v. State
See Bewley v. State, 695 P.2d 1357, 1359 (Okla.Crim.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985); Saugstad v. State, 642 P.2d 616, 617 (Okla.Crim.App.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Troy P. Campbell, United States of America v. Luther D. White
See United States v. Hutchings, 751 F.2d 230, 237 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 75 (1985); United States v. Roth, 736 F.2d 1222, 1226 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1058 , 105 S.Ct. 541 , 83 L.Ed.2d 429 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gustavo Alvarado, United States of America v. Oscar Oqueli-Hernandez
(2×)
See United States v. McAllister, 747 F.2d 1273, 1275 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 92 , 88 L.Ed.2d 76 (1985); United States v. Henderson, 721 F.2d 276, 277-79 (9th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. IAC/Interactive Corp.
See also Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 (985), 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (“Indeed, the salutary purposes of summary judgment-avoiding protracted, expensive and harassing trials-apply no less to discrimination cases than to commercial or other areas of litigation.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Meiri
v.
Dacon
v.
Dacon
No. 84-2031.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Cited by 15 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.