green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Laborers International Union v. HSA Contractors, Inc.
But see, e.g., Service, Hospital, Nursing Home and Public Employees Union, Local No. 47, Affiliated with the Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Commercial Property Services, 755 F.2d 499, 505 (6th Cir.1985) (employer could not be compelled to arbitrate with local union when it was not a signatory of collective bargaining agreement and was found not to be an alter-ego of signatory employer), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985); General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v. Public Service Company of Indiana, 705 F.2d 238, 240-…
cited
Cited "see"
Oficinas Medicas, Inc. v. Carmen Feliciano de Melecio
See Futura Development Corp. v. Centex Corp., 761 F.2d 33, 43-44 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 121 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greater Lansing Ambulatory Surgery Center Co., LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan
See Service, Hospital, Nursing Home & Public Employees Union v. Commercial Property Services, Inc., 755 F.2d 499 , 506 (6th Cir.) (“We therefore hold that a district court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over a non-signatory to a collective bargaining agreement, where no rights or duties of the non-signatory party are stated in the terms and conditions of the contract.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985); Mulder, 31 F.3d at 370 (“§ 301 contemplates suits between unions and employers for breaches of collective bargaining agreements....”) This…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Boyett
See United States v. Johanns, 20 MJ 155 (CMA), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hullett
See United States v. Johanns, 20 MJ 155 (CMA), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Schneider
See United States v. Johanns, 20 MJ 155, 156, 161 (CMA), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell J. Staggs v. David Ausdenmoore
See Service, Hospital, Nursing Home and Public Employees Union v. Commercial Property Services, Inc., 755 F.2d 499 , 506 n. 9 (6th Cir.) ("This circuit has moved away from the position that the court has discretion to retain jurisdiction over a pendent state claim where the federal claim has been dismissed before trial"), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fox
See United States v. Johanns, 20 MJ 155 (CMA), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson
See United States v. Johanns, 20 M.J. 155 (C.M.A.), cert. denied 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985); United States v. Callaway, 21 M.J. 770 (A.C.M.R.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Rospatch Securities Litigation
See Service Hospital Nursing Home and Public Employees Union v. Commercial Property Services, 755 F.2d 499 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985) (dismissal of pendent state claim required once federal claim dismissed).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantis Group, Inc. v. Rospatch Corp.
See Service Hospital Nursing Home and Public Employees Union v. Commercial Property Services, 755 F.2d 499 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985) (dismissal of pendent state claim required once federal claim dismissed).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur G. Strissel, Jr.
See Hackett v. Housing Authority of San Antonio, 750 F.2d 1308, 1312 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 146 , 88 L.Ed.2d 121 (1985); Soden v. Freightliner Corp., 714 F.2d 498, 506 (5th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
See United States v. Johanns, 20 M.J. 155 (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850, 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter A. Walker v. Consumers Power Co.
See, Service, Hospital, Nursing Home and Public Employees Union, Local Nol 47 v. Commercial Property Services, Inc., 755 F.2d 499 (6th Cir.1985), cert. den. 474 U.S. 850 (1985); Kurz v. State of Michigan, 548 F.2d 172 (6th Cir.1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 972 (1977); Gibson v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Detroit, 504 F.2d 826 (6th Cir.1974). 18 Although the district court may have had jurisdiction to try the remanded issue, clearly it had the discretion to dismiss the pendent state law claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gentile v. County of Suffolk
See Cranberg v. Consumers Union, Inc., 756 F.2d 382, 391 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 148 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985) (not only does Rule 611(a) put affirmative obligation on the judge to avoid consumption of time, but, as common law judge, he or she has overall responsibility to see that the trial is not subject to delay) (citing Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d 1115, 1129 (5th Cir.1982), modified, 688 F.2d 266 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1042 , 103 S.Ct. 1438 , 75 L.Ed.2d 795 (1983)); In re Summa T Corp., 73 B.R. 388, 392 (Ark. 1987) (Rule 1006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Thompson Trawlers, Inc.
See Futura Development Corp. v. Centex Corp., 761 F.2d 33, 38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 121 (1985); AVC Nederland B.V. v. Atrium Investment Partnership, 740 F.2d 148, 152-53 (2d Cir.1984); Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 415 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 396 , 70 L.Ed.2d 212 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Thompson Trawlers, Inc.
See Futura Development Corp. v. Centex Corp., 761 F.2d 33, 38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 121 (1985); AVC Nederland B.V. v. Atrium Investment Partnership, 740 F.2d 148, 152-53 (2d Cir.1984); Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 415 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 396 , 70 L.Ed.2d 212 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Arecibo Radio Corporation v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
See Futura Development Corp. v. Centex Corp., 761 F.2d 33, 43-44 (1st Cir.) (applying Puerto Rico law), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 121 (1985). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Merchant Capital, LLC
Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 682 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946); see also Futura Development Corp. v. Centex Corp., 761 F.2d 33, 38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 121 (1985); AVC Nederland B.V. v. Atrium Investment Partnership, 740 F.2d 148, 152-53 (2d Cir.1984); Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 415 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 396 , 70 L.Ed.2d 212 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fox v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
Hoetger & Co., 672 F.2d 580, 583 (6th Cir.1982); see also, Service, Hospital, etc. Local No. 47 v. Commercial Property Services, Inc., 755 F.2d 499 , 506 (6th Cir.) (“a district court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over a non-signatory to a collective bargaining agreement, where no rights or duties of the non-signatory are stated in the terms and conditions of the contract”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fox v. Parker Hannifin Corp.
As the Supreme Court has explained, “if the federal claims are dismissed before trial, ... the state claims should be dismissed as well.” Gibbs, 383 U.S. at 726 , 86 S.Ct. at 1139 ; see also Service, Hosp., Nursing Home and Public Employees Union v. Commercial Property Serv., Inc., 755 F.2d 499 , 506 n. 9 (6th Cir.) (“This circuit has moved away from the position that the court has discretion to retain jurisdiction over a pendent state claim where the federal claim has been dismissed before trial.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fox v. Parker Hannifin Corporation
As the Supreme Court has explained, "if the federal claims are dismissed before trial, ... the state claims should be dismissed as well." Gibbs, 383 U.S. at 726 , 86 S.Ct. at 1139 ; see also Service, Hosp., Nursing Home and Public Employees Union v. Commercial Property Serv., Inc., 755 F.2d 499 , 506 n. 9 (6th Cir.) ("This circuit has moved away from the position that the court has discretion to retain jurisdiction over a pendent state claim where the federal claim has been dismissed before trial."), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Johnson and Anne Johnson, Dresser Industries, Intervenor-Appellant v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
See also Reese v. Mercury Marine, 793 F.2d 1416 , 1423 (5th Cir.1986) and Cranberg v. Consumers Union of U.S., Inc., 756 F.2d 382, 391 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 148 , 88 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Toribio Garcia v. Juan Bauza-Salas
See, e.g., Futura Development Corp. v. Centex Corp., 761 F.2d 33, 45-46 (1st Cir.) (noting existence of public policy exception to res judicata under Puerto Rico law), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850 , 106 S.Ct. 147 , 88 L.Ed.2d 121 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
F. I. Corp., dba Fluidyne Instrumentation
v.
Bank of America, N. T. & S. A.
v.
Bank of America, N. T. & S. A.
No. 85-219.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.