green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“estoppel argument”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Fogarty
(2×)
But see United States v. Bruscantini, 761 F. 2d 640, 641-42 (11th Cir.) (identical situation as Brady but declining to apply Cox and Raley *81 because no entrapment when government that advises is not the same as government that convicts), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 904 , 106 S.Ct. 271 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 233 (1985).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Taber Partners I v. Insurance Co. of North America, Inc.
his circuit prohibits the post-verdict interview of jurors by counsel, litigants or their agents except under the supervision of the district court, and then only in such extraordinary situations as are deemed appropriate
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Shay
Id. at 965. ___ -11- untruthful character, it cannot be used to attack the reliability of a defendant's out-of-court statements because the defendant is a declarant, not a testifying witness.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bissell
Counsel for Barbara BisseU’s passing comment regarding her belief Proposed Jury Instruction No. 100 should not be given does not meet her requirement to state “distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 30 11 ; see United States v. Rosero, 42 F.3d 166, 173 (3d Cir.1994) (“Without a clearly articulated objection, a trial judge is not appraised sufficiently of the contested issue and the need to cure a potential issue____”) (citing United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1128-29 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.E…
cited
Cited "see"
City of Oshkosh v. Winkler
See State v. Kramsvogel, 124 Wis. 2d 101, 114 , 369 N.W.2d 145, 151 , ("we hold that the ordinance violation was a civil proceeding"), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 901 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Cigna Fire Underwriters Co. v. MacDonald & Johnson, Inc.
See United States v. Kepreos, 759 F.2d 961, 967 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 227 , 88 L.Ed.2d 227 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Cigna Fire Insurance v. MacDonald & Johnson
See United States v. Kepreos, 759 F.2d 961, 967 (1st Cir.), ___ _________________________ cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Giampa
In the Third Circuit, the giving of an Allen charge is "normally reversible error.” Id.; accord United States v. Graham, 758 F.2d 879, 883 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985). 132 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Doe, James Roe
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1062 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bertoli
In the Third Circuit, the giving of an Allen charge is “normally reversible error.” Id.; accord United States v. Graham, 758 F.2d 879, 883 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Arditti, United States of America v. Guillermo Avila
(2×)
Congress subsequently amended the statute, but altered only one of the provisions relevant here, § 1956(c)(5) (clarifying, not enacting substantive changes to, definition of "monetary instruments") 4 See also Fifth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 2.21, at 91 (West 1990) (proposed conspiracy instruction "adequately addresses the requirement of a specific intent to violate the law" if no "special state of mind," e.g., premeditation, required by substantive offense); id. § 1.36 at 52 ("we have attempted to define clearly what state of mind is required, i.e., what the defendant must know an…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Naydihor
See State v. Kramsuogel, 124 Wis. 2d 101, 108-09 , 369 N.W.2d 145, 148 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 (1985), and State v. Schulz, 100 Wis. 2d 329, 330 , 302 N.W.2d 59, 60 (Ct. App. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lawton
(2×)
Schulz, 100 Wis. 2d at 331 , 302 N.W.2d at 61 ; see State v. Kramsvogel, 124 Wis. 2d 101, 113-120 , 369 N.W.2d 145, 150-54 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 (1985); State v. Folk, 117 Wis. 2d 42, 47 , 342 N.W.2d 761, 763-64 (Ct. App. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gregory S. Brebner
See United States v. Etheridge, 932 F.2d 318, 321 (4th Cir.1991) (estoppel defense to federal firearms charge rejected because based on advice of state trial judge rather than official of federal government) (citing United States v. Bruscantini, 761 F.2d 640, 641-42 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 904 , 106 S.Ct. 271 , 88 L.Ed.2d 233 (1985)); United States v. Allen, 699 F.2d 453 , 458 n. 1 (9th Cir.1982) (entrapment defense based on alleged misrepresentations of state parole officer rejected because no claim that any federal officials induced unlawful act).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Wayne Campbell
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1066 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985) (due process violation found only in rarest and most outrageous circumstances).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Floyd Osborne, Jr.
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1062 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Loren M. Barta
(2×)
See United States v. Kepreos, 759 F.2d 961, 964 (1st Cir.) (expert psychiatric testimony about defendant’s diminished ability to attend to subtle details in his surroundings excluded from fraud prosecution even though relevant to intent), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 227 , 88 L.Ed.2d 227 (1985); United States v. West, 670 F.2d 675, 682 (7th Cir.) (expert testimony about bribery defendant’s limited intelligence excluded even though offered to show defendant’s good faith belief that he had accepted a legitimate gift), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1124 , 1139, 102 S.Ct. 2944 , 73 L.Ed.2…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Black
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 (1985) (defendant who chose not to withdraw guilty plea waived his right to assert an entrapment defense on appeal); Lindner v. Wyrick, 644 F.2d 724 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 872 (1981) (trial court asked defendant whether he understood that the court was not obligated to follow the State’s recommendation).
cited
Cited "see"
Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.
See United States v. Kepreos, 759 F.2d 961 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 227 , 88 L.Ed.2d 227 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES LAMPTON
See United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1063 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 (1985) (when a defendant enters a guilty plea, he waives his right to assert an entrapment defense).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Golden v. City of Columbus
See generally id.; see also Myers v. City of Alcoa, 752 F.2d 196, 198 (6th Cir.) (recognizing that the holding in Craft depended entirely on Tennessee law), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hazel Golden v. City of Columbus Cheryl Roberto, Director of Public Utilities for the City of Columbus
(2×)
See generally id.; see also Myers v. City of Alcoa, 752 F.2d 196, 198 (6th Cir.) (recognizing that the holding in Craft depended entirely on Tennessee law), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 271 , 88 L.Ed.2d 225 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hardy
See also, U.S. v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058 , 1065 n. 11 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Schneider
Compare United States v. Cameron, 907 F.2d 1051, 1065-66 (11th Cir.1990), and United States v. Twine, 853 F.2d 676, 678-79 (9th Cir.1988), with United States v. White, 766 F.2d 22 , 24— 25 (1st Cir.1985), and United States v. Kepreos, 759 F.2d 961 , 964 n. 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 227 , 88 L.Ed.2d 227 (1985). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reese v. State
See, United States v. Garcia, 528 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 898 , 97 S.Ct. 262 , 50 L.Ed.2d 182 (1976) (concluding that Williamson condemned the use of a contingent fee where it involves the promised payment of a specified sum to convict a specified suspect); United States v. Onori, 535 F.2d 938, 942 (5th Cir.1976) (condemning where a specific sum is for successfully incriminating the indicated defendant); See, also, United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1067 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adair v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Graham , 758 F.2d 879 , 882 (3d Cir.) (wherein the trial court instructed a deadlocked jury, which had previously requested to be dismissed early on Friday afternoon for the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur, that "[t]here are no time deadlines within which you must reach your verdict"), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 226 , 227 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 , 227 (1985); United States v. Bottom , 638 F.2d 781 , 788 (5th Cir. 1981) (wherein the court recognized that an important factor in determining that the Allen charge was not coercive was that "no deadline was set for the ju…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Caldwell
See also, U.S. v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058 , 1065 n. 11 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985); and U.S. v. Nixon, 777 F.2d 958 (5th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel C. Cadle v. City of Newton Falls, Ohio
See also Myers v. City of Alcoa, 752 F.2d 196 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 (1985) (noting that the property interest recognized in Craft was based, at least in part, on the obligation for providing utility services under Tennessee law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel G. Ramos
(2×)
Compare United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1059 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed.2d 226 (1985) (in a case where the defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, the defendant waived his right to appeal the entrapment issue by his conditional guilty plea); United States v. Sarmiento, 786 F.2d 665, 668 (5th Cir.1986) (Entrapment is a defense on the merits that is waived by a conditional guilty plea).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thompson
Compare United States v. Bruscantini, 761 F.2d 640 (11th Cir.) (relying on federal law and holding that a nolo plea, adjudication withheld, qualifies as a “conviction” for purposes of a federal prosecution under section 922), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 904 , 106 S.Ct. 271 , 88 L.Ed.2d 233 (1985) and United States v. Garcia, 727 F.2d 1028 (11th Cir.1984) (same) with United States v. Grinkiewicz, 873 F.2d 253 (11th Cir.1989) (relying on state law and holding that a guilty plea, adjudication withheld, qualifies as a “conviction” for purposes of section 922(g)(1)) and United States v. Orellane…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. M.K. Fadel
See, e.g., United States v. Yater, 756 F.2d 1058, 1062-63 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 225 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 226 (1985); United States v. Swiatek, 632 F.Supp. 985, 993 (N.D.Ill.1986); United States v. Killough, 607 F.Supp. 1009, 1011 (E.D.Ark.1985); United States v. Persico, 520 F.Supp. 96, 98 (E.D.N.Y.1981); United States v. Myers, 527 F.Supp. 1206 (E.D.N.Y.1981); United States v. DePalma, 461 F.Supp. 778, 794 (S.D.N.Y.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Alcoa
v.
Myers, on Behalf of Herself and her Three Minor Children, Dixon
v.
Myers, on Behalf of Herself and her Three Minor Children, Dixon
No. 84-1880.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1) · D. Puerto Rico (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.