green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lee
See Jones v. Angelone, 94 F.3d 900, 905 (4th Cir.1996) (recognizing that federal circuits, with the exception of the Fourth Circuit and the Ninth Circuit, have held that in order to establish that a lengthy pre-indictment delay rises to the level of a due process violation, a defendant must show not only actual substantial prejudice, but also that ‘the government intentionally delayed the indictment to gain an unfair tactical advantage for other bad faith motives’ (quoting United States v. Crooks, 766 F.2d 7, 11 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 421 , 88 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985)…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tracy
See United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 259 (1st Cir.) (absent any indication that jurors were aware of incident, court was within its discretion in not drawing attention to it by inquiring about incident), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tracy
See United ___ ______ States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 259 (1st Cir.) (absent any ______ ______ indication that jurors were aware of incident, court was within its discretion in not drawing attention to it by inquiring about incident), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985). ____ ______ As such it clearly "falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance" and thus precludes a finding of ineffective assistance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mohamed Kadir Mustafa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Sec. 3.19, 3.38, 242.2(d); Matter of P--C--M--, Int.Dec. 3165, at 3 n. 1 (BIA 1991); accord Young v. United States Dep't of Justice, 759 F.2d 450, 457 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985). 17 PETITION DENIED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
cited
Cited "see"
Ame Adaka v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Dec. 3165, at 3 n. 1 (BIA 1991); accord Young v. United States Dep't of Justice, 759 F.2d 450, 457 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Masood Shirazi-Parsa Georgina Shirazi-Parsa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Young v. INS, 759 F.2d 450 , 456 n. 8 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 412 , 88 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moran
See United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 261 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George A. Moran
See United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 261 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 411 , 88 L.Ed.2d 361 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moran
See United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d ___ _____________ ______ 253, 261 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985). ____ ______ We think that a realistic appraisal of Moran's and Willis' relationship would permit a jury to find that it amounts to an implicit agreement and comprehends the continuing supply by one to the other of drugs for resale to customers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lonnie James Brown, United States of America v. Russell Louis Kook
See United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 262 (1st Cir.) (conditional offer to purchase is sufficient for conspiracy purposes, “as long as the potential buyer believes the condition likely to be fulfilled”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 411 , 88 L.Ed.2d 361 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos Armando Castillo-Rodriguez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Young v. INS, 759 F.2d 450 , 455 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 412 , 88 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985). *185 Castillo-Rodríguez first contends that the immigration judge erred in finding that his testimony was self-serving and that he seemed paranoid and not credible as a witness.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rasool v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Young v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, INS, 759 F.2d 450 , 455 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 412 , 88 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985) (denial of discretionary relief, such as asylum, may not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion); 6 San *193 kar v. I.N.S., 757 F.2d 532 (3d Cir.1985) (court will overturn decision of the BIA only if it abused its discretion). 7 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale Scott Hunnewell
See United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 258-59 (1st Cir.) (when plausible allegation of juror misconduct is made, trial court must investigate to ascertain whether the misconduct actually occurred, and if so, to assess the effect), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 411 , 88 L.Ed.2d 361 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard Schultz
See United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 262-63 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 411 , 88 L.Ed.2d 361 (1985) (sufficient evidence to support conspiracy when defendant “at least agreed conditionally to ‘purchase the marijuana with an intent to distribute it’— i.e., he agreed to buy if the quality was adequate.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
B
Mat- ter of Acosta, 19 I&N Dec. 211 (BIA 1985), modified on other grounds, Mat- ter of Mogharrabi, supra; see also Young v. INS, 759 F.2d 450 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Narciso Vallez Melendez v. U.S. Department of Justice and Immigration and Naturalization Service
Compare Campos-Guardado v. INS, 809 F.2d 285, 286-89 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 826 , 108 S.Ct. 92 , 98 L.Ed.2d 53 (1987) (affirming the Board because “the record reflects substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusions that Ms. Campos is not entitled to withholding of deportation and is not eligible for a discretionary grant of asylum,” but later noting that “the ultimate denial of asylum” cannot be disturbed “absent a showing that such action was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion”) (quoting Young v. INS, 759 F.2d 450 , 455 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CHANG
The respondent bears the evidentiary burdens of proof and persuasion in any application for asylum under section 208(a) or withholding of deportation under section 243(h) of the Act. 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.5 , 242.17(e) (1988); Rebollo-Jovel v. INS, 794 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1986); Matter of Maldonado-Cruz, 19 I&N Dec. 509 (BIA 1988); Matter of Acosta, 19 I&N Dec. 211 (BIA 1985), modified on other grounds, Matter of Mogharrabi, supra; see also Young v. United States Dept. of Justice, INS, 759 F.2d 450 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kraselnick
United States v. Tibboel, 753 F.2d 608, 612 (7th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 257 (1st Cir.) (“As a practical matter, it may be impossible for a court to decide 10 or 100 motions, all within the same thirty-day period.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 411 , 88 L.Ed.2d 361 *492 (1985); United States v. Latham, 754 F.2d 747 (7th Cir.1985). 1 It seems clear that a slight delay while a court carefully considers and decides a legion of pretrial motions is preferable to the court deciding the motions with one eye— dr perhaps both eyes — on the clock.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Boylan
See, e.g., United States v. Anello, 765 F.2d 253, 258 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 411 , 88 L.Ed.2d 361 (1985); United States v. Kelly, 722 F.2d 873 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 1425 , 79 L.Ed.2d 749 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
FITZROY NATHANIEL LAWRENCE v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
Any alien’s application for bail or bond must be submitted directly to the Attorney General, whose ruling is subject to review by a district court in proceedings separate and distinct from deportation proceedings. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(1); In re Ghalamsiah, 806 F.2d 68, 73 (3rd Cir. 1986); See also Young v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, INS, 759 F.2d 450, 457 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S. Ct. 412 , 88 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lepman
v.
New Jersey Racing Commission
v.
New Jersey Racing Commission
No. 85-651.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 18, 1985.
Published
Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.