green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
14.4 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases ·
“[I]f a ground for relief was not raised in the military courts, then the district court must deem that ground waived.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Patrick M.
But see State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 526 , 504 A.2d 480 (holding ‘‘that postarrest silence is inadmissible under principles of the law of evi- dence . . . [b]ecause many persons, even in the absence of a Miranda warning, are aware of their right to remain silent and are frequently advised by counsel to exercise that right when arrested’’), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bozicevich v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
f a ground for relief was not raised in the military courts, then the district court must deem that ground waived.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.
when an indictment contains all the essential elements of the charged offense, the accused may obtain the factual proof supporting the charge, if vital to his defense, by a motion for a bill of particulars.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
U.S. v. Satterwhite
principles of judicial restraint and precedent dictate that, in most cases, we should not reach the probable cause issue if . . . the good-faith exception of leon will resolve the matter.
cited
Cited "see"
Chapman v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
See Watson v. McCotter, 782 F.2d 143, 144 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 (1986); U.S. ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction
Unlike a typical claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland , which can only be adequately litigated in a collateral proceeding; see State v. Leecan , 198 Conn. 517 , 541, 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2922 , 91 L.Ed.2d 550 (1986) ; claims of structural error based on the complete denial of counsel in a proceeding would be apparent on the record.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lee-Riveras
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 531 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lahai
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kitchens
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541-42 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mungroo
The defendant concedes that evidence of a defendant’s prearrest silence is not inadmissible on the same constitutional grounds; see State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 521-23 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541-42 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541-42 , 504 A.2d 480 (holding that all ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims could be reviewed in habeas corpus proceedings), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lockhart
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Laracuente
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas Wayne Thompson v. Page True, Warden, U.S.P. Leavenworth
See Watson v. McCotter, 782 F.2d 143, 145 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986); cf. Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts [Section 2254 Rules]. 5 Mr. Thompson claimed in his petition that the seizure of his two state case files constituted a deprivation of property in violation of due process of law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. TRUE
See Watson v. McCotter , 782 F.2d 143, 145 (10th -2- Cir.), cert. denied , 476 U.S. 1184 (1986); cf. Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts [Section 2254 Rules].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie J. Webster
See United States v. Mosley, 786 F.2d 1330, 1334 (7th Cir.) (‘When an indictment contains all the essential elements of the charged offense, the accused may obtain the *173 factual proof supporting the charges, if vital to his defense, by a motion for a bill of particulars.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Phidd
Although this claim appears to be more appropriate for a habeas proceeding because the constitutional right at issue deals with the trial counsel’s ability to represent his client effectively; see State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ricky G. Stallings v. Robert J. Tansy, Warden
See United States v. Hack, 782 F.2d 862, 868 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986); United States v. Foster, 783 F.2d 1082 , 1085 and n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1986) (in banc) (citing other circuit cases in accord).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Weiner
Accord United States v. Mitchell, 777 F.2d 248 , 260 n. 3 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986); United States v. Morelli, 643 F.2d 402, 412 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 3143 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Weiner
Accord United States ______ _____________ v. Mitchell, 777 F.2d 248 , 260 n.3 (5th Cir. 1985), cert. ________ _____ denied, 476 U.S. 1184 (1986); United States v. Morelli, 643 ______ _____________ _______ F.2d 402, 412 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 912 (1981). ____________ Of course, the evidence, although relevant, might have been overly prejudicial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy White
See United States v. Mitchell, 777 F.2d 248, 261 (5th Cir.1985) (finding that evidence supported conviction for conspiracy to import drugs, where the defendant had knowledge of the origin of the drug shipments, participated in weighing and distributing the drugs, and collected and disbursed funds in connection with the importation), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986); see also United States v. Rojas-Martinez, 968 F.2d 415, 420-21 (5th Cir.) (finding circumstantial evidence sufficient *1469 to support conviction for conspiracy to import marijuana), cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Pofahl
See United States v. Mitchell, 777 F.2d 248, 261 (5th Cir. 1985) (finding that evidence supported conviction for conspiracy to import drugs, where the defendant had knowledge of the origin of the drug shipments, participated in weighing and distributing the drugs, and collected and disbursed funds in connection with the importation), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2921 , 91 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Barbieri
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Greenwood
See United States v. Mitchell, 777 F.2d 248, 259-60 (5th Cir.1985) (conspiring to distribute an illicit substance is a classic example of a conspiracy in which "each member had to have realized that the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role"), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986). 20 Finally, Estrada claims that Stone's pivotal testimony about Estrada's role in the conspiracy was inconsistent and otherwise incredible as a matter of law.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Greenwood
See United States v. Mitchell, 777 F.2d 248, 259-60 (5th Cir.1985) (conspiring to distribute an illicit substance is a classic example of a conspiracy in which “each member had to have realized that the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bobby Russell
See United States v. Maggitt, 778 F.2d 1029, 1035 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2920 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Tedford, 875 F.2d 446, 448 (5th Cir.1989) (citations omitted) (this court accepts facts underlying the trial court’s finding of good faith unless clearly erroneous; the court’s ultimate determination that officers acted in good faith is a conclusion of law subject to de novo review).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Russell
See United States v. Maggitt, 778 F.2d 1029, 1035 (5th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2920 (1986); United States v. Tedford, 875 F.2d 446, 448 (5th Cir. 1989) (citations omitted) (this court accepts facts underlying the trial court's finding of good faith unless clearly erroneous; the court's ultimate determination that officers acted in good faith is a conclusion of law subject to de novo review).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Eldon Lokey, Michael Stutevoss, Christopher Anthony Davis
See United States v. Mitchell, 111 F.2d 248, 259-60 (5th Cir.1985) (A conspiracy to distribute narcotics is a “prime example” of a conspiracy in which each member “had to have realized that the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Bruce Cox
See United States v. Hack, 782 F.2d 862, 870 (10th Cir.) (“Neither a mere allegation that defendant would have a better chance of acquittal in a separate trial, nor a complaint of the ‘spillover effect’ from the evidence that was overwhelming or more damaging against the co-defendant than that against the moving party is sufficient to warrant severance.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Alvin W. Dodson, Jr. v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, Commandant
(4×)
See Watson v. McCotter, 782 F.2d 143, 144 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986); King v. Moseley, 430 F.2d 732, 734 (10th Cir.1970); Bennett v. Davis, 267 F.2d 15, 17 (10th Cir.1959); Dickenson v. Davis, 245 F.2d 317, 320 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 918 , 78 S.Ct. 349 , 2 L.Ed.2d 278 (1958); Easley v. Hunter, 209 F.2d 483, 486-87 (10th Cir.1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Solomon Monk, Also Known as David L. Martin v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, Commandant
See Watson v. McCotter, 782 F.2d 143, 144 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986); King v. Moseley, 430 F.2d 732, 734-35 (10th Cir.1970).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rogers
See United States v. Hack, 782 F.2d 862, 870-71 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Rogers A/K/A New York
See United States v. Hack, 782 F.2d 862, 870-71 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Christopher Leecan v. Raymond Lopes, Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2922 , 91 L.Ed.2d 550 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pittman
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 522 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce L. Craig
See United States v. Maggitt, 778 F.2d 1029, 1033 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2920 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Gant, 759 F.2d 484, 486 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 851 , 106 S.Ct. 149 , 88 L.Ed.2d 123 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Dodson v. Zelez
See Watson v. McCotter, 782 F.2d 143, 144 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Plourde
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 524 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. State
United States v. Johnston, 1st Cir., 784 F.2d 416, 425 (1986); see United States v. Mitchell, 5th Cir., 777 F.2d 248, 256 (1985) (defendant’s due process rights not violated by delayed access to sentencing reduction materials which were sealed by court order, when materials released in time for effective use during cross-examination of witness at trial), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986); United States v. Higgs, 3rd Cir., 713 F.2d 39, 44 (1983) (accused’s due process rights to fair trial satisfied when material which could be used to impeach witness’ cr…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward Loeswick
See United States v. Mosley, 786 F.2d 1330, 1333 (7th Cir.), cert denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2919 , 91 L.Ed.2d 548 (1986); United States v. Price, 763 F.2d 640, 643 (4th Cir.1985); United States v. Lyons, 703 F.2d 815, 821 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. Berardi, 629 F.2d 723, 729 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 995 , 101 S.Ct. 534 , 66 L.Ed.2d 293 (1980); United States v. Sheehy, 541 F.2d 123, 130 (1st Cir.1976); United States v. Untiedt, 493 F.2d 1056 , 1059 n. 3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 862 , 95 S.Ct. 115 , 42 L.Ed.2d 98 (1974); United States v. Frank, 290 F.2d 195, 196 …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Silano
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 526 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ventura
See State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541-42 , 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robles
See, e.g., State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 541 , 504 A.2d 480 (‘‘[t]he trial transcript seldom discloses all of the considerations of strategy that may have induced counsel to follow a particular course of action’’), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
State v. Taft , 306 Conn. 749 , 768, 51 A.3d 988 (2012) ; see also State v. Leecan , 198 Conn. 517 , 541, 504 A.2d 480 ("a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is more properly pursued on a petition for a new trial or on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus rather than on direct appeal" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2922 , 91 L.Ed.2d 550 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaddah v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., State v. Leecan , 198 Conn. 517 , 542, 504 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2922 , 91 L.Ed.2d 550 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Polynice
Further- more, [o]n the rare occasions that [this court has] addressed an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal, [it has] limited [its] review to allegations that the defendant’s sixth amendment rights had been jeopardized by the actions of the trial court, rather than by those of his counsel. . . . [This court has] addressed such claims, moreover, only where the record of the trial court’s allegedly improper action was adequate for review or the issue presented was a question of law, not one of fact requiring further evidentiary development.’’ (Citation omitted; emp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Campbell
See also State v. Leecan, 198 Conn. 517, 540 , 504 A.2d 480 (court found sufficient evidence of availability of witness because witness continued to occupy same residence she previously had shared with defendant and continued to communicate with defendant), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S. Ct. 2922 , 91 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maggitt
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-6388.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1986.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.