green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.8 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1996 ·
…our clerk's mistaken rejection of the complaint when it was timely offered should not bar its consideration, and it should be deemed timely filed.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Fisher
Martino, 825 F.2d at 759 (collecting cases); but see United States v. Rosenfield, 780 F.2d 10 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3294 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1985); United States v. Serubo, 604 F.2d 807 (3d Cir.1979); United States v. Johns, 688 F.Supp. 1017 (E.D.Pa.1988) (Ditter, J.).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wilkerson v. Martin Marietta Corp.
(2×)
the parties to a settlement will not be heard to complain that the relief is substantially less than what' they would have received from a successful resolution after trial
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Francisco Lucas Rodriguez-Roman v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(4×)
our clerk's mistaken rejection of the complaint when it was timely offered should not bar its consideration, and it should be deemed timely filed.
cited
Cited "see"
Sluijmers v. United States
See Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp., 781 F.2d 1022 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3294 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986) (internal quotation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter Woodburn Eubanks v. James H. Billington, Tommy Shaw v. James H. Billington
(2×)
See EEOC v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc., 768 F.2d 884 , 889 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3293 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott
(2×)
See United States v. Merchant, 760 F.2d 963, 969 (9th Cir.1985), cert. granted, 478 U.S. 1003 , 106 S.Ct. 3293 , 92 L.Ed.2d 708 (1986), cert. dismissed, 480 U.S. 615 , 107 S.Ct. 1596 , 94 L.Ed.2d 614 (1987); 5 see also, United States v. Davis, 932 F.2d 752, 758, n. 4 (9th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert M. SILVER, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Merchant, 760 F.2d 963, 967 (9th Cir.1985), cert. granted, 478 U.S. 1003 , 106 S.Ct. 3293 , 92 L.Ed.2d 708 (1986), cert. dismissed, 480 U.S. 615 , 107 S.Ct. 1596 , 94 L.Ed.2d 614 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,014 George Mink, Individually, for Use and Benefit of Insurance Company of North America v. Genmar Industries, Inc., Etc., Defendant-Third-Party v. Joseph Riddick Hendrick, Iii, J.R.H. Racing, Inc., D/B/A Hendrick Motor Sport, Hendrick Motor Sport, Third-Party
See Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp., 781 F.2d 1022 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3294 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986) (defective mast); Sperry Rand Corp. v. Radio Corp., 618 F.2d 319 (5th Cir.1980) (defective steering gyro); Jones v. Bender Welding & Mach.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mink v. Genmar Industries, Inc.
See Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp., 781 F.2d 1022 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3294 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986) (defective mast); Sperry Rand Corp. v. Radio Corp., 618 F.2d 319 (5th Cir.1980) (defective steering gyro); Jones v. Bender Welding & Mach.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Elsa Designs, Ltd.
See AFP Imaging Corp. v. Ross, 780 F.2d 202, 204 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3295 , 92 L.Ed.2d 710 (1986) (factual issues concerning apparent authority or authority by es-toppel do not lend themselves to summary disposition).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. Dredge Enterprise
See Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp., 627 F.Supp. 65, 75-76 (E.D.N.C.1985), affd., 781 F.2d 1022 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3294 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986); see also, Durden v. Exxon Corp., 803 F.2d 845 , 1987 A.M.C. 1666 (5th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johns
See United States v. Rosenfield, 780 F.2d 10 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3294 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission v. Bonneville Power Administration James J. Jura, as Administrator and John S. Herrington, as Secretary of the Department of Energy of the United States of America, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. James J. Jura, as Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration John S. Herrington, as Secretary of the Department of Energy of the United States of America and the United States of America
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Forelaws on Board v. Johnson, 743 F.2d 677, 681-82 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 3293 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
California Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission v. Bonneville Power Administration
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Forelaws on Board v. Johnson, 743 F.2d 677, 681-82 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 3293 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rooke v. City of Scotts Valley
See First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, prob. juris. noted, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 3292 , 92 L.Ed.2d 708 (1986); Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, prob. juris, noted, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 312 , 93 L.Ed.2d 286 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Novembrino
(4×)
See United States v. Merchant, 760 F. 2d 963, 968-69 (9th Cir.1985), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3293 , 92 L.Ed. 2d 708 (1986); United States v. Sager, supra, 743 F. 2d at 1264-65 ; United States v. Hendricks, 743 F. 2d 653, 656 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1006 , 105 S.Ct. 1362 , 84 L.Ed. 2d 382 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forest Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service
(2×)
See Thomas v. Peterson, 753 F.2d 754, 764 (9th Cir.1985) (stating that "absent 'unusual circumstances,' an injunction is the appropriate remedy for a violation of NEPA's procedural requirements"); see also Amoco Production Co. v. Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 541, 544-45 , 107 S.Ct. 1396, 1403-04 , 94 L.Ed.2d 542 (1987) (requiring equitable balancing of harms for injunctive relief in actions involving environmental impact, and noting, in summarizing Ninth Circuit law, that "unusual circumstances" weighing against injunctive relief include "those in which an injunction would interfere with a long-term…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forest Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service
(2×)
See Thomas v. Peterson, 753 F.2d 754, 764 (9th Cir.1985) (stating that “absent ‘unusual circumstances,’ an injunction is the appropriate remedy for a violation of NEPA’s procedural requirements”); see also Amoco Production Co. v. Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 541, 544-45 , 107 S.Ct. 1396, 1403-04 , 94 L.Ed.2d 542 (1987) (requiring equitable balancing of harms for injunctive relief in actions involving environmental impact, and noting, in summarizing Ninth Circuit law, that “unusual circumstances” weighing against injunctive relief include “those in which an injunction would interfere …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club v. United States Forest Service
(2×)
See e.g., Forelaws on Board v. Johnson, 743 F.2d 677, 685-86 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1004 , 106 S.Ct. 3293 , 92 L.Ed.2d 709 (1986) (injunction inappropriate where a clear tension existed between NEPA's mandate to evaluate environmental impacts and another statute's direction that contracts be in place within twenty-one months of passage and where it would interfere with a long-term contractual relationship); American Motorcyclist Ass'n v. Watt, 714 F.2d 962, 965-67 (9th Cir.1983) (injunction inappropriate where it would result in more harm to the environment). 28 We reverse the …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
West
v.
Conrail
v.
Conrail
No. 85-1804.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 30, 1986.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (4) · D. Colorado (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari granted.