green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Mark Davidson
The Supreme Court remanded the case to this court for reconsideration in light of the Solicitor General’s position, Petty, 481 U.S. at 1034-35, and this court remanded the case for resentencing. 828 F.2d at 3 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Thomas L. Hudspeth
The Supreme Court vacated the judgment and instructed the appellate court to reconsider in view of the Solicitor General's position that offenses should be counted separately only if they occurred at different times, and that "career criminal" status should reflect a history of "multiple criminal episodes" rather than multiple convictions arising from a single "episode." Petty, 481 U.S. at 1034-35, 107 S.Ct. at 1968-69.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jonathan Folds
See United States v. McElyea, 158 F.3d 1016, 1019-20 (9th Cir. 1998) (explaining that the 1988 amendment’s purpose was “to reflect the Solicitor General’s construction” of the statute articulated in the government’s brief before the United States Supreme Court in Petty v. United States, 481 U.S. 1034 (1987) (quotation omitted)); Towne, 870 F.2d at 890 (“The Solicitor General’s brief [in Petty] canvassed the statute’s legislative history and attempted to demonstrate that Congress had intended its sentencing enhancement provision to apply only to recidivists and repeat offenders,…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Gardner
See Petty v United States, 481 US 1034 (1987), United States v Petty, 828 F2d 2 (CA 8,1987), United States v Petty, 798 F2d 1157 (CA 8, 1986), and 134 Cong Rec S17360, 17370 (daily ed November 10, 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Selby
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157 (8th Cir.1986), vacated by, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 (1987) (“Petty I”) and United States v. Petty, 828 F.2d 2 (8th Cir.1987) (“Petty II") (interpreting “three previous convictions” in the sentencing enhancement provision of 18 U.S.C. § 1202 (a), predecessor statute to 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)); United States v. Blackwood, 913 F.2d 139 (4th Cir.1990) (interpreting the meaning of “two or more prior convictions” in the sentencing enhancement statute, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b) (1) (A) (iii)). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. South Florida Water Management District
See United States v. M.C.C. of Fla., Inc., 772 F.2d 1501 , 1505-06 (11th Cir.1985), vacated on other grounds by 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 809 (1987), reinstated in relevant part on remand, 848 F.2d 1133 (11th Cir.1988). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pope
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157, 1159-60 (8th Cir.1986), vacated, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
48 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 773, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 929 United States of America v. Clifford Kelly Pope, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157, 1159-60 (8th Cir.1986), vacated, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Anthony R. West v. United States
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157, 1162 (8th Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Eugene Jackson
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157, 1162 (8th Cir. 1986), vacated on other grounds, 481 U.S. 1034 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricardo A. Godinez
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157 (8th Cir.1986), vacated, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 sentence reduced on remand, 828 F.2d 2 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lem Hughes
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157 (8th Cir.1986), vacated and remanded, Petty v. United States, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 (1987), on remand, United States v. Petty, 828 F.2d 2, 3 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (adopting Solicitor General's argument that 18 U.S.C. § 1202 (a)(1), a sentencing enhancement statute, was “intended to reach multiple criminal episodes that were distinct in time, not multiple felony convictions arising out of a single criminal episode”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1057 , 108 S.Ct. 2827 , 100 L.Ed.2d 928 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del.
See M.C.C. of Fla., Inc. v. United States, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 809 (1987), vacating and remanding 772 F.2d 1501 , 1506-07 (11th Cir.1985) (in light of Tull)-, Granfinanciera, supra, rev’g sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Longbehn
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir.1986), vacated on other grounds, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Charles Longbehn, A/K/A William Charles Sisson, Otto William, William Otto, and Peg Leg, United States of America v. Elizabeth Lundstrom, United States of America v. Angela Sisson
See United States v. Petty, 798 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir.1986), vacated on other grounds, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jarrells, Unpublished Decision (2-7-2000)
See, e.g., State v. Scott (1986), 26 Ohio St.3d 92 , 497 N.E.2d 55 , cert. denied (1986), 480 U.S. 923 , 94 L.Ed.2d 699 , 107 S.Ct. 1386 , reh. denied (1986) 481 U.S. 1034 , 95 L.Ed.2d 538 , 107 S.Ct. 1966 ; State v. Cron (1967), 14 Ohio App.2d 76 , 236 N.E.2d 671 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bay-Houston Towing Co., Inc.
We hold only that -by asserting jurisdiction over “any redeposit,” including incidental fallback, the Tulloch Rule outruns the Corps’s statutory authority. 145 F.3d at 1405 ; see also, Rybachek, supra (placer mining falls under § 404), citing Avoyelles, United States v. M.C.C. of Florida, Inc., 772 F.2d 1501, 1506 (11th Cir.1985)(aetion of digging up sediment and redepositing it on seat bottom by boat propellers constitutes an addition of pollutants), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 809 (1987), readopted in part and remanded on other gr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwin A. Towne, Jr.
See also Brief of Solicitor General at 4-10, Petty v. United States, 481 U.S. 1034 , 107 S.Ct. 1968 , 95 L.Ed.2d 810 (1987) (canvassing the legislative history). 5 We believe that the Armed Career Criminal Act indeed was aimed at career criminals, rather than “those who *891 merely commit three punishable acts.” Wicks, 833 F.2d at 195 (Pregerson, J., dissenting); see also Armed Career Criminal Act, Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Crime of the House Comm, on the Judiciary, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 47-66 (1984) (testimony of Assistant Attorney General Stephen S. Trott) (“Trott Testimony”); Ar…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Griffin
v.
Martin, Warden Scott v. Ohio Russell v. Garraghty, Warden Mahdavi v. Shirani Henry v. Merit Systems Protection Board Starkes v. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections Hill v. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections Montgomery v. Internal Revenue Service
v.
Martin, Warden Scott v. Ohio Russell v. Garraghty, Warden Mahdavi v. Shirani Henry v. Merit Systems Protection Board Starkes v. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections Hill v. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections Montgomery v. Internal Revenue Service
No. 86-5701; No. 86-5953; No. 86-6147; No. 86-6206; No. 86-6256; No. 86-6268; No. 86-6341; No. 86-6345.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 27, 1987.
481 U.S. 1034
Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar